| Literature DB >> 22428006 |
Shelby E Wilson1, Césaire T Ouédraogo, Lea Prince, Amadou Ouédraogo, Sonja Y Hess, Noël Rouamba, Jean Bosco Ouédraogo, Stephen A Vosti, Kenneth H Brown.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: To design effective national diarrhea control programs, including oral rehydration solution (ORS) and therapeutic zinc supplementation, information is needed on local perceptions of illness, external care seeking behaviors, and home treatment practices.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22428006 PMCID: PMC3302832 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033273
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Summary of sampling framework for the survey in rural southwestern Burkina Faso.
The sampling framework for the participation of health centers, communities, concessions, households, and children in the survey. Health centers and communities were first selected based on their accessibility by vehicle. In each community, concessions and households were visited to identify children <27 months of age and to interview their primary caregivers.
Demographic and economic characteristics of the sample.
| Total child sample (N = 10,490) | Children with clinically defined diarrhea episode in previous 2 weeks (N = 1,067) | |||
| Characteristic | N | % | N | % |
|
| ||||
| <20 | 1303 | 12.4 | 147 | 13.8 |
| 20–29 | 5353 | 51 | 559 | 52.4 |
| 30–39 | 2750 | 26.2 | 260 | 24.4 |
| 40–49 | 428 | 4.1 | 49 | 4.6 |
|
| ||||
| Muslim | 8273 | 78.9 | 850 | 79.7 |
| Traditional | 1448 | 13.8 | 145 | 13.6 |
| Christian | 742 | 7.1 | 71 | 6.7 |
|
| ||||
| None, non-literate | 7498 | 71.5 | 724 | 67.9 |
| None, literate | 903 | 8.6 | 110 | 10.3 |
| Primary | 1551 | 14.8 | 173 | 16.2 |
| Secondary or higher | 520 | 5 | 60 | 5.6 |
|
| ||||
| 0 (living in same town, village) | 5695 | 54.3 | 542 | 50.8 |
| >0 and <5 | 1234 | 11.8 | 143 | 13.4 |
| 5–10 | 1583 | 15.1 | 163 | 15.3 |
| >10 | 1978 | 18.9 | 219 | 20.5 |
|
| ||||
| Male | 5234 | 49.9 | 578 | 54.2 |
| Female | 5204 | 49.6 | 487 | 45.6 |
|
| ||||
| <2 | 899 | 8.6 | 24 | 2.3 |
| 2–3 | 950 | 9.1 | 57 | 5.3 |
| 4–5 | 868 | 8.3 | 70 | 6.6 |
| 6–11 | 2310 | 22 | 308 | 28.9 |
| 12–17 | 2555 | 24.4 | 308 | 28.9 |
| 18–23 | 2019 | 19.3 | 212 | 19.9 |
| 24–27 | 792 | 7.6 | 81 | 7.6 |
Numbers may not sum due to missing values. Difference between indicated N and number of observations represents missing or unknown information.
Figure 2Sensitivity and specificity using different cutoffs for number of liquid/semi-liquid stools to define diarrhea.
The sensitivity and specificity of caregiver diagnoses are shown for different cutoffs of reported frequency of liquid or semi-liquid stools. Caregiver diagnostic sensitivity increased from 0.55 using the cutoff of 3 stools per day to 0.78 when ≥6 stools were reported. Specificity was consistently >0.93.
Results of a multiple logistic regression analysis for factors predicting caregiver recognition of clinically defined diarrhea (N = 1,067).
| Characteristic | OR |
|
|
| ||
| Present ( | 2.72 (1.92, 3.87) | <0.0001 |
| Absent ( | Ref. | |
|
| ||
| None ( | 2.74 (1.39, 5.41) | 0.015 |
| Primary ( | 2.42 (1.11, 5.28) | |
| Secondary or higher ( | Ref. | |
|
| ||
| Senoufo ( | 0.89 (0.51, 1.57) | 0.011 |
| Mossi ( | 1.61 (0.85, 3.03) | |
| Siamou ( | 1.08 (0.57, 2.02) | |
| Toussiant ( | 1.78 (0.84, 3.78) | |
| Samos ( | 1.18 (0.59, 2.36) | |
| Dioula ( | 0.72 (0.29, 1.76) | |
| Peulh ( | 1.90 (0.79, 4.58) | |
| Bobo ( | 5.11 (1.68, 15.54) | |
| Other ( | Ref. | |
|
| ||
| <6 ( | 0.27 (0.19, 0.39) | <0.0001 |
| 6–27 ( | Ref. |
Each odds ratio is adjusted for each other characteristic included in the table. Independent variables included in the model were the presence of fever, vomiting, and decreased appetite, mother's education, household ethnic group, household religion and child sex. Clinically defined diarrhea = ≥3 liquid or semi-liquid stools/d. Ref. = reference category for each independent variable.
Results of a multiple logistic regression analysis for factors predicting any care seeking outside the home for clinically defined childhood diarrhea (N = 1,067).
| Characteristic | OR |
|
|
| ||
| Present ( | 1.90 (1.42, 2.55) | <0.0001 |
| Absent ( | Ref. | |
|
| ||
| Present ( | 1.53 (1.14, 2.06) | 0.005 |
| Absent ( | Ref. | |
|
| ||
| Present ( | 1.53 (1.16, 2.00) | 0.002 |
| Absent ( | Ref. | |
|
| ||
| <3 days ( | Ref. | <0.001 |
| 3–7 days ( | 1.62 (1.18, 2.22) | |
| 8–14 days ( | 2.03 (1.38, 2.99) | |
| ≥15 days ( | 4.21 (1.61, 11.04) | |
|
| ||
| 1–2 ( | Ref. | 0.003 |
| 3–4 ( | 0.70 (0.51, 0.96) | |
| ≥5 ( | 0.58 (0.42, 0.80) | |
|
| ||
| 0 (same town or village; | Ref. | 0.010 |
| >0 and <5 ( | 0.90 (0.60, 1.34) | |
| 5–10 ( | 1.12 (0.77, 1.65) | |
| >10 ( | 0.59 (0.42, 0.83) | |
|
| ||
| Male ( | 1.33 (1.02, 1.73) | 0.0336 |
| Female ( | Ref. |
Each odds ratio is adjusted for each other characteristic included in the table. Independent variables included in the model were the presence of fever, vomiting, and decreased appetite, duration of diarrhea episode, mother's parity, distance from child's residence to public health center, and child sex.
Percent of child caregivers who reported using different forms of treatment for clinically defined childhood diarrhea by type of care provider consulted (N = 1,067).
| Treatment given | Formal | Traditional practitioner, | Market vendor, | No care provider sought outside the home, |
|
| Traditional therapy | 5.3 | 88.4 | 28.8 | 46 | <0.0001 |
| Oral rehydration solution | 45.9 | 11.6 | 5 | 8.2 | <0.0001 |
| Anti-diarrheal | 25.7 | 2.9 | 30.5 | 1.7 | <0.0001 |
| Antibiotic | 28.1 | 1.5 | 10.2 | 1.9 | <0.0001 |
| Anti-malarial | 19.3 | 0 | 11.9 | 1.9 | <0.0001 |
| Other medicine, type unidentified | 51.9 | 14.5 | 30.5 | 14 | <0.0001 |
| None | 0.9 | 1.5 | 3.7 | 35.3 | <0.0001 |
Up to three responses accepted; numbers may not sum to 100% due to missing values.
Includes public health center or hospital, pharmacy, or private doctor.
Results of a multiple logistic regression analysis for factors predicting any treatment given to child for clinically defined childhood diarrhea (N = 1,067).
| Characteristic | OR |
|
|
| ||
| 0 ( | Ref. | <0.0001 |
| 1 ( | 1.98 (1.25, 3.13) | |
| 2 ( | 2.99 (1.90, 4.71) | |
| ≥3 ( | 3.05 (1.80, 5.15) | |
|
| ||
| 0 (same town, village; | Ref. | 0.001 |
| >0 and <5 ( | 0.68 (0.41, 1.13) | |
| 5–10 ( | 1.09 (0.63, 1.89) | |
| >10 ( | 0.47 (0.31, 0.70) |
Each odds ratio is adjusted for each other characteristic included in the table. Independent variables included in the model were the presence of fever, vomiting, and decreased appetite.