Literature DB >> 22426425

Sex differences in components of imagined perspective transformation.

Mark R Gardner1, Ingrid Sorhus, Caroline J Edmonds, Rosalind Potts.   

Abstract

Little research to date has examined whether sex differences in spatial ability extend to the mental self rotation involved in taking on a third party perspective. This question was addressed in the present study by assessing components of imagined perspective transformations in twenty men and twenty women. Participants made speeded left-right judgements about the hand in which an object was held by front- and back- facing schematic human figures in an "own body transformation task." Response times were longer when the figure did not share the same spatial orientation as the participant, and were substantially longer than those made for a control task requiring left-right judgements about the same stimuli from the participant's own point of view. A sex difference in imagined perspective transformation favouring males was found to be restricted to the speed of imagined self rotation, and was not observed for components indexing readiness to take a third party point of view, nor in left-right confusion. These findings indicate that the range of spatial abilities for which a sex difference has been established should be extended to include imagined perspective transformations. They also suggest that imagined perspective transformations may not draw upon those empathic social-emotional perspective taking processes for which females show an advantage.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22426425     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  7 in total

1.  Visuospatial transformations and personality: evidence of a relationship between visuospatial perspective taking and self-reported emotional empathy.

Authors:  Valentina Sulpizio; Giorgia Committeri; Emilia Metta; Simon Lambrey; Alain Berthoz; Gaspare Galati
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Empathy: gender effects in brain and behavior.

Authors:  Leonardo Christov-Moore; Elizabeth A Simpson; Gino Coudé; Kristina Grigaityte; Marco Iacoboni; Pier Francesco Ferrari
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 3.  Assessing mental imagery in clinical psychology: a review of imagery measures and a guiding framework.

Authors:  David G Pearson; Catherine Deeprose; Sophie M A Wallace-Hadrill; Stephanie Burnett Heyes; Emily A Holmes
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-09-11

4.  Empathy Modulates the Evaluation Processing of Altruistic Outcomes.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Xinmu Hu; Kan Shi; Xiaoqin Mai
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-04

5.  Men perform comparably to women in a perspective taking task after administration of intranasal oxytocin but not after placebo.

Authors:  Angeliki Theodoridou; Angela C Rowe; Christine Mohr
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 6.  Visual perspective taking and laterality decisions: Problems and possible solutions.

Authors:  Mark May; Mike Wendt
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Language Can Obscure as Well as Facilitate Apparent-Theory of Mind Performance: Part 2-The Case of Dyslexia in Adulthood.

Authors:  Barlow C Wright; Bernice A L Wright
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.