Literature DB >> 22426367

The cost efficiency of HPV vaccines is significantly underestimated due to omission of conisation-associated prematurity with neonatal mortality and morbidity.

Philipp Soergel1, Lars Makowski, Cordula Schippert, Ismini Staboulidou, Ursula Hille, Peter Hillemanns.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) represents the precursor of invasive cervical cancer and is associated with human papillomavirus infection (HPV) against which two vaccines have been approved in the last years. Standard treatments of high-grade CIN are conisation procedures, which are associated with an increased risk of subsequent pregnancy complications like premature delivery and possible subsequent life-long disability. HPV vaccination has therefore the potential to decrease neonatal morbidity and mortality. This has not been taken into account in published cost-effectiveness models.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We calculated the possible reduction rate of conisations for different vaccination strategies for Germany. Using this rate, we computed the reduction of conisation-associated preterm deliveries, life-long disability and neonatal death due to prematurity. The number of life-years saved (LYS) and gain in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) was estimated. The incremental costs per LYS / additional QALY were calculated.
RESULTS: The reduction of conisation procedures was highest in scenario I (vaccination coverage 90% prior to HPV exposition) with about 50%. The costs per LYS or additional QALY were lowest in scenario I, II and III with 45,101 € or 43,505-47,855 € and rose up to 60,544 € or 58,401-64,240 € in scenario V (50% vaccinated prior to sexual activity + additional 20% catch-up at a mean age of 20 y).
CONCLUSION: Regarding the HPV 16 / 18 vaccines as "vaccines against conisation-related neonatal morbidity and mortality" alone, they already have the potential to be cost-effective. This effect adds up to reduction of cervical cancer cases and decreased costs of screening for CIN. Further studies on cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination should take the significant amount of neonatal morbidity and mortality into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22426367     DOI: 10.4161/hv.18519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother        ISSN: 2164-5515            Impact factor:   3.452


  6 in total

1.  The Economic Value of Vaccination: Why Prevention is Wealth.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Mark Access Health Policy       Date:  2015-08-12

2.  Estimating the cost-effectiveness profile of a universal vaccination programme with a nine-valent HPV vaccine in Austria.

Authors:  L Boiron; E Joura; N Largeron; B Prager; M Uhart
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 3.090

3.  Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination in Germany.

Authors:  Oliver Damm; Johannes Horn; Rafael T Mikolajczyk; Mirjam E E Kretzschmar; Andreas M Kaufmann; Yvonne Deleré; Bernhard Ultsch; Ole Wichmann; Alexander Krämer; Wolfgang Greiner
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2017-09-04

4.  Estimating the epidemiological impact and cost-effectiveness profile of a nonavalent HPV vaccine in Spain.

Authors:  Jesús De La Fuente; Juan José Hernandez Aguado; María San Martín; Paula Ramirez Boix; Sergio Cedillo Gómez; Noelia López
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  The intangible benefits of vaccination - what is the true economic value of vaccination?

Authors:  Paolo Bonanni; Juan José Picazo; Vanessa Rémy
Journal:  J Mark Access Health Policy       Date:  2015-08-12

6.  The association between adverse pregnancy outcomes and maternal human papillomavirus infection: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Joseph Niyibizi; Nadège Zanré; Marie-Hélène Mayrand; Helen Trottier
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.