Literature DB >> 22426247

A Bayesian adaptive design for multi-dose, randomized, placebo-controlled phase I/II trials.

Fang Xie1, Yuan Ji, Lothar Tremmel.   

Abstract

We present a design for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) featuring two simultaneous iterative processes, dose escalation and cohort expansion. In this design, patient enrollment does not need to stop when transitioning from the evaluation of the dose safety and tolerability to the assessment of its efficacy. The cohort expansion used in dose-finding is adaptive, based on the interim comparisons between each dose and placebo. A set of Bayesian rules guides the decisions about dose cohort expansion. Operating characteristics of this design have been evaluated by simulations designed to mimic the trial conduct and outcome in a variety of dose toxicity and efficacy scenarios. Simulation studies demonstrated that our proposed adaptive design can reduce the total sample size as compared to the conventional approach. The sample size reduction was more profound in scenarios when the testing doses are not effective. Simulation studies also demonstrated that this proposed adaptive design controls the false positive error rate at the specified level and provides adequate statistical power to detect the treatment effect. Compared to the conventional approach, our proposed adaptive design removes ineffective doses, reduces the total sample size, and maintains adequate power for dose-finding. The proposed design has been implemented in an ongoing study and software for trial simulation is available at http://odin.mdacc.tmc.edu/~yuanj/soft.html.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22426247     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  8 in total

1.  Modified toxicity probability interval design: a safer and more reliable method than the 3 + 3 design for practical phase I trials.

Authors:  Yuan Ji; Sue-Jane Wang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Model-based clinical drug development in the past, present and future: a commentary.

Authors:  Holly Kimko; José Pinheiro
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  A phase I/II seamless dose escalation/expansion with adaptive randomization scheme (SEARS).

Authors:  Haitao Pan; Fang Xie; Ping Liu; Jielai Xia; Yuan Ji
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  A novel Bayesian seamless phase I/II design.

Authors:  Haitao Pan; Ping Huang; Zuoren Wang; Ling Wang; Chanjuan Li; Jielai Xia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Sample sizes in dosage investigational clinical trials: a systematic evaluation.

Authors:  Ji-Han Huang; Qian-Min Su; Juan Yang; Ying-Hua Lv; Ying-Chun He; Jun-Chao Chen; Ling Xu; Kun Wang; Qing-Shan Zheng
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 4.162

6.  Adaptive treatment allocation and selection in multi-arm clinical trials: a Bayesian perspective.

Authors:  Elja Arjas; Dario Gasbarra
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Quality improvement and practice-based research in neurology using the electronic medical record.

Authors:  Demetrius M Maraganore; Roberta Frigerio; Nazia Kazmi; Steven L Meyers; Meredith Sefa; Shaun A Walters; Jonathan C Silverstein
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2015-10

8.  Evaluation of a multi-arm multi-stage Bayesian design for phase II drug selection trials - an example in hemato-oncology.

Authors:  Louis Jacob; Maria Uvarova; Sandrine Boulet; Inva Begaj; Sylvie Chevret
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.615

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.