OBJECTIVE: This study compared, in treatment and control groups, the phenomena of coaction, which is the probability that taking effective action on one behavior is related to taking effective action on a second behavior. METHODS: Pooled data from three randomized trials of Transtheoretical Model (TTM) tailored interventions (n=9461), completed in the U.S. in 1999, were analyzed to assess coaction in three behavior pairs (diet and sun protection, diet and smoking, and sun protection and smoking). Odds ratios (ORs) compared the likelihood of taking action on a second behavior compared to taking action on only one behavior. RESULTS: Across behavior pairs, at 12 and 24 months, the ORs for the treatment group were greater on an absolute basis than for the control group, with two being significant. The combined ORs at 12 and 24 months, respectively, were 1.63 and 1.85 for treatment and 1.20 and 1.10 for control. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study with addictive, energy balance and appearance-related behaviors were consistent with results found in three studies applying TTM tailoring to energy balance behaviors. Across studies, there was more coaction within the treatment group. Future research should identify predictors of coaction in more multiple behavior change interventions. Published by Elsevier Inc.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This study compared, in treatment and control groups, the phenomena of coaction, which is the probability that taking effective action on one behavior is related to taking effective action on a second behavior. METHODS: Pooled data from three randomized trials of Transtheoretical Model (TTM) tailored interventions (n=9461), completed in the U.S. in 1999, were analyzed to assess coaction in three behavior pairs (diet and sun protection, diet and smoking, and sun protection and smoking). Odds ratios (ORs) compared the likelihood of taking action on a second behavior compared to taking action on only one behavior. RESULTS: Across behavior pairs, at 12 and 24 months, the ORs for the treatment group were greater on an absolute basis than for the control group, with two being significant. The combined ORs at 12 and 24 months, respectively, were 1.63 and 1.85 for treatment and 1.20 and 1.10 for control. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study with addictive, energy balance and appearance-related behaviors were consistent with results found in three studies applying TTM tailoring to energy balance behaviors. Across studies, there was more coaction within the treatment group. Future research should identify predictors of coaction in more multiple behavior change interventions. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: David Berrigan; Kevin Dodd; Richard P Troiano; Susan M Krebs-Smith; Rachel Ballard Barbash Journal: Prev Med Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Lawrence J Fine; G Stephane Philogene; Robert Gramling; Elliot J Coups; Sarbajit Sinha Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: James O Prochaska; Wayne F Velicer; Joseph S Rossi; Colleen A Redding; Geoffrey W Greene; Susan R Rossi; Xiaowu Sun; Joseph L Fava; Robert Laforge; Brett A Plummer Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Leanne M Mauriello; Mary Margaret H Ciavatta; Andrea L Paiva; Karen J Sherman; Patricia H Castle; Janet L Johnson; Janice M Prochaska Journal: Prev Med Date: 2010-08-25 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Larkin L Strong; Diana S Hoover; Natalia I Heredia; Sarah Krasny; Claire A Spears; Virmarie Correa-Fernández; David W Wetter; Maria E Fernandez Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2016-05-30
Authors: Virmarie Correa-Fernández; Elba C Díaz-Toro; Lorraine R Reitzel; Lin Guo; Minxing Chen; Yisheng Li; William A Calo; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; David W Wetter Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2016-10-22 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Jeffrey P Haibach; Michael Ann Haibach; Katherine S Hall; Robin M Masheb; Melissa A Little; Robyn L Shepardson; Anne C Dobmeyer; Jennifer S Funderburk; Christopher L Hunter; Margaret Dundon; Leslie R M Hausmann; Stephen K Trynosky; David E Goodrich; Amy M Kilbourne; Sara J Knight; Gerald W Talcott; Michael G Goldstein Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2016-09-27
Authors: Deborah A Levesque; Mary Margaret Ciavatta; Patricia H Castle; Janice M Prochaska; James O Prochaska Journal: Psychol Violence Date: 2012-10-01
Authors: Molly Lynch; Linda Squiers; Megan A Lewis; Rebecca Moultrie; Julia Kish-Doto; Vanessa Boudewyns; Carla Bann; Denise M Levis; Elizabeth W Mitchell Journal: Soc Mar Q Date: 2014-05-13
Authors: Rachel A Rizzo; Anne M Neumann; Stella O C King; Robert F Hoey; Deborah S Finnell; Richard D Blondell Journal: MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs Date: 2014 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.412
Authors: Hui-Qing Yin; James O Prochaska; Joseph S Rossi; Colleen A Redding; Andrea L Paiva; Bryan Blissmer; Wayne F Velicer; Sara S Johnson; Hisanori Kobayashi Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 3.046