| Literature DB >> 22425669 |
Benjamin Thyreau1, Yannick Schwartz, Bertrand Thirion, Vincent Frouin, Eva Loth, Sabine Vollstädt-Klein, Tomas Paus, Eric Artiges, Patricia J Conrod, Gunter Schumann, Robert Whelan, Jean-Baptiste Poline.
Abstract
In this paper we investigate the use of classical fMRI Random Effect (RFX) group statistics when analyzing a very large cohort and the possible improvement brought from anatomical information. Using 1326 subjects from the IMAGEN study, we first give a global picture of the evolution of the group effect t-value from a simple face-watching contrast with increasing cohort size. We obtain a wide activated pattern, far from being limited to the reasonably expected brain areas, illustrating the difference between statistical significance and practical significance. This motivates us to inject tissue-probability information into the group estimation, we model the BOLD contrast using a matter-weighted mixture of Gaussians and compare it to the common, single-Gaussian model. In both cases, the model parameters are estimated per-voxel for one subgroup, and the likelihood of both models is computed on a second, separate subgroup to reflect model generalization capacity. Various group sizes are tested, and significance is asserted using a 10-fold cross-validation scheme. We conclude that adding matter information consistently improves the quantitative analysis of BOLD responses in some areas of the brain, particularly those where accurate inter-subject registration remains challenging.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22425669 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.083
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage ISSN: 1053-8119 Impact factor: 6.556