Literature DB >> 22425430

A comparison of ECT dosing methods using a clinical sample.

Daniel M Bennett1, Jennifer S Perrin, James Currie, Lisa Blacklaw, Joji Kuriakose, Ahsan Rao, Ian C Reid.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several methods have been used to determine ECT dose based on formulae, protocols or fixed-dosing. This study aims to explore the relative utility of these ECT dosing methods.
METHODS: A sample of ECT patients from Aberdeen was analysed. Seizure thresholds derived empirically were used to calculate the proportions of patients who would have had a therapeutic stimulus had Half-Age or a fixed-dosing method (200 mC for those <65 years old and 250 mC for those >65 years old) been used.
RESULTS: 62 patients were included. Initial seizure threshold varied 6 fold across the sample. Using the Half Age method 19.4% would have had a therapeutic seizure at first stimulation compared with 61.3% using an age based fixed protocol and 0% using the Royal College recommended dose titration method. Half Age and Fixed Dosing would have significantly (p<.0001) reduced the number of stimulations, the cumulative electrical dose delivered, the complexity of the procedure and the number of treatment sessions required. LIMITATIONS: This study applies only to patients receiving bilateral ECT for a major depressive episode. It uses a pragmatic design to explore a common clinical issue. This allows the feasibility of further work to be explored as this would be precluded by ethical concerns otherwise. It also uses ECT parameters which are common in UK practice which may limit its applicability internationally.
CONCLUSIONS: Age based fixed-dosing would simplify the ECT process and result in more patients receiving effective treatment at first stimulation.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22425430     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.02.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  6 in total

1.  Similar clinical improvement of depression using 0.5-ms and 1-ms pulse widths in bilateral electroconvulsive therapy.

Authors:  Aida de Arriba-Arnau; Virginia Soria; Neus Salvat-Pujol; José M Menchón; Mikel Urretavizcaya
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Total Charge Required to Induce a Seizure in a Retrospective Cohort of Patients Undergoing Dose Titration of Right Unilateral Ultrabrief Pulse Electroconvulsive Therapy.

Authors:  James Luccarelli; Thomas H McCoy; Stephen J Seiner; Michael E Henry
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.692

3.  Pre-treatment amygdala volume predicts electroconvulsive therapy response.

Authors:  Freek Ten Doesschate; Philip van Eijndhoven; Indira Tendolkar; Guido A van Wingen; Jeroen A van Waarde
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.157

4.  Initial Seizure Threshold in Brief-Pulse Bilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy in Patients with Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder.

Authors:  Seong Hoon Jeong; Tak Youn; Younsuk Lee; Jin Hyeok Jang; Young Wook Jeong; Yong Sik Kim; In Won Chung
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.505

5.  Effect of age and anticonvulsants on seizure threshold during bilateral electroconvulsive therapy with brief-pulse stimulus: A chart-based analysis.

Authors:  Abhishek R Nitturkar; Preeti Sinha; Virupakshappa I Bagewadi; Jagadisha Thirthalli
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.759

6.  Stimulus intensity determined by dose-titration versus age-based methods in electroconvulsive therapy in Thai patients.

Authors:  Pichai Ittasakul; Apichaya Likitnukul; Umporn Pitidhrammabhorn; Punjaporn Waleeprakhon; Morris B Goldman
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.570

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.