Literature DB >> 22425302

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification system of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty.

Gohar A Naqvi1, Shakoor A Baig, Nasir Awan.   

Abstract

The Vancouver classification system of periprosthetic fractures has been revalidated in this study, using the radiographs of 45 patients. Three consultants and 3 trainees reviewed the radiographs independently, on 2 separate occasions, at least 2 weeks apart. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement and validity were analyzed, using weighted κ statistics. The mean κ value for interobserver agreement was found to be 0.69 (0.63-0.72) for consultants and 0.61 (0.56-0.65) for the trainees, both representing substantial agreement. Intraobserver κ values ranged from 0.74 to 0.90, showing substantial agreement. Validity analysis of 37 type B cases revealed 81% agreement within B1, B2, and B3 subgroups with a κ value of 0.68 (substantial agreement). This study has reconfirmed the reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification while it also emphasizes the intraoperative assessment of implant stability.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22425302     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  26 in total

Review 1.  Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; Umberto Cottino; Tad M Mabry
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The Baba classification focused on implant designs is useful in setting the therapeutic strategy for interprosthetic femoral fracture.

Authors:  Tomonori Baba; Kazuo Kaneko; Yasuhiro Homma; Hironori Ochi; Yu Ozaki; Taiji Watari; Mikio Matsumoto
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-09-27

Review 3.  [Treatment of periprosthetic and peri-implant fractures : modern plate osteosynthesis procedures].

Authors:  M J Raschke; R Stange; C Kösters
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 4.  [Treatment of periprosthetic and peri-implant fractures : modern plate osteosynthesis procedures].

Authors:  M J Raschke; R Stange; C Kösters
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  [Treatment of periprosthetic fractures : new concepts in operative treatment].

Authors:  D Wähnert; B Schliemann; M J Raschke; C Kösters
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Femoral revision for periprosthetic fracture in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Luke G Menken; Jose A Rodriguez
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-12-14

Review 7.  Extended trochanteric osteotomy: current concepts review.

Authors:  Senthil Nathan Sambandam; Gopinath Duraisamy; Jayadev Chandrasekharan; Varatharaj Mounasamy
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-02-29

8.  Comparative study of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fractures treated by internal fixation versus stem revision.

Authors:  Sagi Martinov; Sebastien D'ulisse; Edouard Haumont; Dragos Schiopu; Pieter Reynders; Tamás Illés
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 9.  Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and current treatment.

Authors:  Antonio Capone; Stefano Congia; Roberto Civinini; Giuseppe Marongiu
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2017-10-25

10.  New classification focusing on implant designs useful for setting therapeutic strategy for periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Tomonori Baba; Yasuhiro Homma; Rei Momomura; Hideo Kobayashi; Mikio Matsumoto; Kentaro Futamura; Atsuhiko Mogami; Akio Kanda; Itaru Morohashi; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.