Literature DB >> 22425260

Association of estimated GFR with platelet inhibition in patients treated with clopidogrel.

Clotilde Muller1, Sophie Caillard, Laurence Jesel, Soraya El Ghannudi, Patrick Ohlmann, Erik Sauleau, Thierry Hannedouche, Christian Gachet, Bruno Moulin, Olivier Morel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The reasons that decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) might alter the clinical efficacy of clopidogrel are poorly understood. STUDY
DESIGN: In this study, we sought to evaluate whether decreased GFR alters platelet response to clopidogrel in patients receiving a maintenance dose of clopidogrel (75 mg/d for at least 8 days). SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS: 126 consecutive patients categorized by estimated GFR: stages 1-2 (>60 mL/min/1.73 m(2); n = 29), stage 3a (45-59 mL/min/1.73 m(2); n = 21); stage 3b (30-44 mL/min/1.73 m(2); n = 26), stage 4 (15-29 mL/min/1.73 m(2); n = 14), and stage 5 (<15 mL/min/1.73 m(2); n = 36) were prospectively enrolled. PREDICTOR: Residual platelet reactivity, defined in the VASP (Vasodilator Stimulated Phosphoprotein) flow cytometry test as platelet reactivity index (PRI) ≥61% and in the VerifyNow turbidimetric-based assay as a value >235 PRU (adenosine diphosphate receptor reaction units) or percentage of platelet inhibition <15%. OUTCOMES: We examined factors associated with low response to clopidogrel using logistic regression.
RESULTS: A significant relationship between estimated GFR, PRI, PRU, and percentage of inhibition was found. The prevalence of residual platelet reactivity was highest in patients with GFR stage 5. PRI ≥61% occurred in 52.8% of patients with stage 5 versus 30.8% of stage 3b and 24.1% of stages 1-2 (P = 0.1). PRU >235 was found in 63.6% of patients with stage 5 versus 36.8% of stage 3b and 17.2% of stages 1-2 (P = 0.005). Inhibition <15% affected 66.7% of patients with stage 5 versus 21.1% of stage 3b and 17.2% of stages 1-2 (P < 0.001). In the multivariable model, GFR stage 5 (adjusted prevalence ratio [PR], 3.10; 95% CI, 1.23-9.43; P = 0.02), and obesity (adjusted PR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.34-2.23; P = 0.004) were the sole predictors of residual platelet reactivity. LIMITATIONS: Interference of hemodialysis with the pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel could not be excluded.
CONCLUSION: GFR stage 5 is associated with substantial impairment of platelet inhibition independently of diabetes mellitus.
Copyright © 2012 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22425260     DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.12.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  13 in total

1.  Repetitive stent thrombosis in a patient who had resistance to both clopidogrel and prasugrel.

Authors:  Yuji Ohno; Sho Okada; Hideki Kitahara; Takeshi Nishi; Takashi Nakayama; Yoshihide Fujimoto; Yoshio Kobayashi
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2016-03-02

Review 2.  Oral antiplatelet drugs in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD): a review.

Authors:  Homam Ibrahim; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  Towards Personalized Antithrombotic Treatments: Focus on P2Y12 Inhibitors and Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

Authors:  Jean Terrier; Youssef Daali; Pierre Fontana; Chantal Csajka; Jean-Luc Reny
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Ilaprazole and Clopidogrel Resistance in Acute Stroke Patients.

Authors:  In Hwan Lim; Seung Jae Lee; Byoung-Soo Shin; Hyun Goo Kang
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-09

5.  Impaired P2Y12 inhibition by clopidogrel in kidney transplant recipients: results from a cohort study.

Authors:  Clotilde Muller; Nathan Messas; Peggy Perrin; Jerome Olagne; Gabriela Gautier-Vargas; Noelle Cognard; Sophie Caillard; Bruno Moulin; Olivier Morel
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 6.  The Personalization of Clopidogrel Antiplatelet Therapy: The Role of Integrative Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacometabolomics.

Authors:  Arwa M Amin; Lim Sheau Chin; Dzul Azri Mohamed Noor; Muhamad Ali Sk Abdul Kader; Yuen Kah Hay; Baharudin Ibrahim
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 1.866

7.  Prognostic Value of Incomplete Revascularization after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following Acute Coronary Syndrome: Focus on CKD Patients.

Authors:  Thomas Cardi; Anas Kayali; Antonin Trimaille; Benjamin Marchandot; Jessica Ristorto; Viet Anh Hoang; Sébastien Hess; Marion Kibler; Laurence Jesel; Patrick Ohlmann; Olivier Morel
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Association of P2Y12 gene promoter DNA methylation with the risk of clopidogrel resistance in coronary artery disease patients.

Authors:  Jia Su; Xiaojing Li; Qinglin Yu; Yahui Liu; Yaqing Wang; Haojun Song; Hanbin Cui; Weiping Du; Xiaohong Fei; Junsong Liu; Shaoyi Lin; Jian Wang; Wenyuan Zheng; Jinyan Zhong; Lulu Zhang; Maoqing Tong; Jin Xu; Xiaomin Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Pharmacogenomic Impact of CYP2C19 Variation on Clopidogrel Therapy in Precision Cardiovascular Medicine.

Authors:  Sherry-Ann Brown; Naveen Pereira
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2018-01-30

10.  Antiplatelet Therapy in ACS Patients: Comparing Appropriate P2Y12 Inhibition by Clopidogrel to the Use of New P2Y12 Inhibitors.

Authors:  Jessica Ristorto; Nathan Messas; Benjamin Marchandot; Marion Kibler; Sébastien Hess; Nicolas Meyer; Michael Schaeffer; Nicolas Tuzin; Patrick Ohlmann; Laurence Jesel; Olivier Morel
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.928

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.