Literature DB >> 22425126

Approach to management of iatrogenic foreign bodies of the lower urinary tract following reconstructive pelvic surgery.

Priya Padmanabhan1, Ryan C Hutchinson, W Stuart Reynolds, Melissa Kaufman, Harriette M Scarpero, Roger R Dmochowski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Evolving techniques and materials for pelvic reconstruction have resulted in corresponding increases in the risk of iatrogenic foreign bodies in the lower urinary tract and vagina. We review the presentation, management and outcomes of iatrogenic foreign bodies in the female lower urinary tract and vagina.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the records of all women undergoing removal of lower urinary tract foreign bodies during a 9-year period. All patients underwent a structured evaluation including history, physical examination, ancillary testing as indicated and subjective symptom appraisal.
RESULTS: A total of 85 women were identified, of whom 48 had vaginal, 40 had lower urinary tract, and 3 had concomitant vaginal and lower urinary tract excision of foreign material. Of the lower urinary tract cases the foreign body was located in the urethra in 12, bladder neck in 10, bladder wall in 18 and trigone in 3, while the remainder of the cases was vaginal in location. Aggressive surgical management aimed at removal or debulking of the exposed foreign body necessitated cystorrhaphy/partial cystectomy (20), urethroplasty (18) and fistula repair (3). Of the patients with vaginal excision 36 (75%) reported cure (of presenting symptoms), 10 (20.8%) reported improvement and 2 were unavailable for followup. Of the patients with lower urinary tract excision 21 (52.5%) reported cure, 14 (35%) indicated improvement and 5 were unavailable for followup.
CONCLUSIONS: In a complex group of women with vaginal or lower urinary tract foreign body extrusion, aggressive operative management resulted in high rates of subjective patient cure. Adequate assessment of newer reconstructive technologies is critical to assess the full impact of these complications.
Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22425126     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  Surgical management of lower urinary mesh perforation after mid-urethral polypropylene mesh sling: mesh excision, urinary tract reconstruction and concomitant pubovaginal sling with autologous rectus fascia.

Authors:  Ketul Shah; Dmitriy Nikolavsky; Daniel Gilsdorf; Brian J Flynn
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery.

Authors:  Jerry G Blaivas; Rajveer S Purohit; Matthew S Benedon; Gabriel Mekel; Michael Stern; Mubashir Billah; Kola Olugbade; Robert Bendavid; Vladimir Iakovlev
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Joint position statement on the management of mesh-related complications for the FPMRS specialist.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Tongue cleaner, an unusual foreign body in the urethra: A case report.

Authors:  Anant Dinesh; Aradhna Singh; Sushanto Neogi
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2013-10-31

Review 5.  Management of Mesh Complications after SUI and POP Repair: Review and Analysis of the Current Literature.

Authors:  D Barski; D Y Deng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Vaginal mesh - the controversy.

Authors:  Joanna M Togami; Elizabeth Brown; J Christian Winters
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2012-11-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.