PURPOSE:Learning laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis is a crucial step in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Previously we noted that practice on a low fidelity urethrovesical model was more effective for trainees than basic suturing drills on a foam pad when learning laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis skills. We evaluated learner transfer of skills, specifically whether skills learned on the urethrovesical model would transfer to a high fidelity, live animal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 28 senior residents, fellows and staff surgeons in urology, general surgery and gynecology were randomized to 2 hours of laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis training on a urethrovesical model (group 1) or to basic laparoscopic suturing and knot tying on foam pads (group 2). All participants then performed timed laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis on anesthetized female pigs. A blinded urologist scored subject videotaped performance using checklist, global rating scale and end product rating scores. RESULTS: Group 1 was significantly more adept than group 2 at the laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis pig task when measured by the checklist, global rating scale and end product rating (each p <0.05). Time to completion was similar in the 2 groups. No statistically significant difference was noted in global rating scale and checklist scores for laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis performed on the urethrovesical model vs the pig. CONCLUSIONS: Training on a urethrovesical model is superior to training with basic laparoscopic suturing on a foam pad for performing laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis skills on an anesthetized female pig. Skills learned on a urethrovesical model transfer to a high fidelity, live animal model.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Learning laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis is a crucial step in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Previously we noted that practice on a low fidelity urethrovesical model was more effective for trainees than basic suturing drills on a foam pad when learning laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis skills. We evaluated learner transfer of skills, specifically whether skills learned on the urethrovesical model would transfer to a high fidelity, live animal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 28 senior residents, fellows and staff surgeons in urology, general surgery and gynecology were randomized to 2 hours of laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis training on a urethrovesical model (group 1) or to basic laparoscopic suturing and knot tying on foam pads (group 2). All participants then performed timed laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis on anesthetized female pigs. A blinded urologist scored subject videotaped performance using checklist, global rating scale and end product rating scores. RESULTS: Group 1 was significantly more adept than group 2 at the laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosispig task when measured by the checklist, global rating scale and end product rating (each p <0.05). Time to completion was similar in the 2 groups. No statistically significant difference was noted in global rating scale and checklist scores for laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis performed on the urethrovesical model vs the pig. CONCLUSIONS: Training on a urethrovesical model is superior to training with basic laparoscopic suturing on a foam pad for performing laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis skills on an anesthetized female pig. Skills learned on a urethrovesical model transfer to a high fidelity, live animal model.
Authors: Nathan C Wong; Jen Hoogenes; Yanbo Guo; Mackenize A Quantz; Edward D Matsumoto Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2017-07-11 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Jae Yoon Kim; Seung Bin Kim; Jong Hyun Pyun; Hyung Keun Kim; Seok Cho; Jeong Gu Lee; Je Jong Kim; Jun Cheon; Seok Ho Kang; Sung Gu Kang Journal: Korean J Urol Date: 2015-11-03
Authors: Sergio Alonso Y Gregorio; Juan Gómez Rivas; Susana Sánchez Molina; Angel Tabernero Gómez; Jesús Cisneros Ledo; Jesús Díez Sebastián; Jesús Javier de la Peña Barthel Journal: Cent European J Urol Date: 2014-08-18
Authors: Flemming Bjerrum; Jette Led Sorensen; Lars Konge; Jane Lindschou; Susanne Rosthøj; Bent Ottesen; Jeanett Strandbygaard Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2014-10-10 Impact factor: 2.463