Literature DB >> 22425041

Transfer of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy skills from bench model to animal model: a prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled study.

Robert Sabbagh1, Suman Chatterjee, Arun Chawla, Jen Hoogenes, Anil Kapoor, Edward D Matsumoto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Learning laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis is a crucial step in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Previously we noted that practice on a low fidelity urethrovesical model was more effective for trainees than basic suturing drills on a foam pad when learning laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis skills. We evaluated learner transfer of skills, specifically whether skills learned on the urethrovesical model would transfer to a high fidelity, live animal model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 28 senior residents, fellows and staff surgeons in urology, general surgery and gynecology were randomized to 2 hours of laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis training on a urethrovesical model (group 1) or to basic laparoscopic suturing and knot tying on foam pads (group 2). All participants then performed timed laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis on anesthetized female pigs. A blinded urologist scored subject videotaped performance using checklist, global rating scale and end product rating scores.
RESULTS: Group 1 was significantly more adept than group 2 at the laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis pig task when measured by the checklist, global rating scale and end product rating (each p <0.05). Time to completion was similar in the 2 groups. No statistically significant difference was noted in global rating scale and checklist scores for laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis performed on the urethrovesical model vs the pig.
CONCLUSIONS: Training on a urethrovesical model is superior to training with basic laparoscopic suturing on a foam pad for performing laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis skills on an anesthetized female pig. Skills learned on a urethrovesical model transfer to a high fidelity, live animal model.
Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22425041     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  8 in total

1.  Simulation-trained junior residents perform better than general surgeons on advanced laparoscopic cases.

Authors:  Camilo Boza; Felipe León; Erwin Buckel; Arnoldo Riquelme; Fernando Crovari; Jorge Martínez; Rajesh Aggarwal; Teodor Grantcharov; Nicolás Jarufe; Julián Varas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Techniques: Utility of a 3D printed bladder model for teaching minimally invasive urethrovesical anastomosis.

Authors:  Nathan C Wong; Jen Hoogenes; Yanbo Guo; Mackenize A Quantz; Edward D Matsumoto
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Simulation-based training and assessment in urological surgery.

Authors:  Abdullatif Aydin; Nicholas Raison; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Kamran Ahmed
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Transferability of laparoscopic skills using the virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  Cui Yang; Uljana Kalinitschenko; Jens R Helmert; Juergen Weitz; Christoph Reissfelder; Soeren Torge Mees
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Concurrent and predictive validation of robotic simulator Tube 3 module.

Authors:  Jae Yoon Kim; Seung Bin Kim; Jong Hyun Pyun; Hyung Keun Kim; Seok Cho; Jeong Gu Lee; Je Jong Kim; Jun Cheon; Seok Ho Kang; Sung Gu Kang
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-11-03

6.  The 'complements' to virtual simulation.

Authors:  Juan Gómez Rivas; Selçuk Sarıkaya
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2015

7.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy training for residents: Hospital Universitario La Paz model.

Authors:  Sergio Alonso Y Gregorio; Juan Gómez Rivas; Susana Sánchez Molina; Angel Tabernero Gómez; Jesús Cisneros Ledo; Jesús Díez Sebastián; Jesús Javier de la Peña Barthel
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2014-08-18

8.  Procedural specificity in laparoscopic simulator training: protocol for a randomised educational superiority trial.

Authors:  Flemming Bjerrum; Jette Led Sorensen; Lars Konge; Jane Lindschou; Susanne Rosthøj; Bent Ottesen; Jeanett Strandbygaard
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.