Literature DB >> 22425024

The fundamental role of subcellular topography in peripheral nerve repair therapies.

Eric C Spivey1, Zin Z Khaing, Jason B Shear, Christine E Schmidt.   

Abstract

Clinical evidence suggests that nano- and microtopography incorporated into scaffolds does not merely improve peripheral nerve regeneration, but is in fact a prerequisite for meaningful restoration of nerve function. Although the biological mechanisms involved are not fully understood, grafts incorporating physical guides that mimic microscopic nerve tissue features (e.g., basal laminae) appear to provide a significant advantage over grafts that rely on purely chemical or macroscopic similarities to nerve tissue. Investigators consistently demonstrate the fundamental importance of nano- and micro-scale physical features for appropriate cell response in a wide range of biological scenarios. Additionally, recent in vivo research demonstrates that nerve regeneration scaffolds with cell-scale physical features are more effective than those that rely only on chemical or macro-scale features. Physical guidance at the cell-scale is especially important for long (>20 mm) nerve defects, for which the only reliable treatment is the autologous nerve graft. The lack of other available options exposes a clear need for the application of nano- and microfabrication techniques that will allow the next generation of engineered nerve guides to more closely mimic native tissue at those scales. This review examines current research to determine what elements of cell-scale topography in experimental scaffolds are most effective at stimulating functional recovery, and then presents an overview of fabrication techniques that could potentially improve future treatment paradigms. Relative advantages and disadvantages of these techniques are discussed, with respect to both clinical adaptation and likely effectiveness. Our intent is to more clearly delineate the remaining obstacles in the development of a next generation nerve guide, particularly for long defects, and offer new perspectives on steering current technologies towards clinically viable solutions.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22425024     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  29 in total

Review 1.  Progress and perspectives of neural tissue engineering.

Authors:  Xiaosong Gu
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Fabrication and evaluation of PLLA multichannel conduits with nanofibrous microstructure for the differentiation of NSCs in vitro.

Authors:  Chen-Guang Zeng; Yi Xiong; Gaoyi Xie; Peng Dong; Daping Quan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Immunoengineering nerve repair.

Authors:  Nassir Mokarram; Kyle Dymanus; Akhil Srinivasan; Johnathan G Lyon; John Tipton; Jason Chu; Arthur W English; Ravi V Bellamkonda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Recent advances in nanotherapeutic strategies for spinal cord injury repair.

Authors:  Young Hye Song; Nikunj K Agrawal; Jonathan M Griffin; Christine E Schmidt
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 15.470

5.  Magnetic particle templating of hydrogels: engineering naturally derived hydrogel scaffolds with 3D aligned microarchitecture for nerve repair.

Authors:  Christopher S Lacko; Ishita Singh; Monica A Wall; Andrew R Garcia; Stacy L Porvasnik; Carlos Rinaldi; Christine E Schmidt
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Thermally drawn fibers as nerve guidance scaffolds.

Authors:  Ryan A Koppes; Seongjun Park; Tiffany Hood; Xiaoting Jia; Negin Abdolrahim Poorheravi; Anilkumar Harapanahalli Achyuta; Yoel Fink; Polina Anikeeva
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Effect of modulating macrophage phenotype on peripheral nerve repair.

Authors:  Nassir Mokarram; Alishah Merchant; Vivek Mukhatyar; Gaurangkumar Patel; Ravi V Bellamkonda
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 8.  Engineering peripheral nerve repair.

Authors:  Laura M Marquardt; Shelly E Sakiyama-Elbert
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 9.  Combining topographical and genetic cues to promote neuronal fate specification in stem cells.

Authors:  Erin K Purcell; Youssef Naim; Amy Yang; Michelle K Leach; J Matthew Velkey; R Keith Duncan; Joseph M Corey
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 6.988

10.  Photopolymerized microfeatures for directed spiral ganglion neurite and Schwann cell growth.

Authors:  Bradley W Tuft; Shufeng Li; Linjing Xu; Joseph C Clarke; Scott P White; Bradley A Guymon; Krystian X Perez; Marlan R Hansen; C Allan Guymon
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.