Literature DB >> 22424956

Indications and results for the Exogen™ ultrasound system in the management of non-union: a 59-case pilot study.

X Roussignol1, C Currey, F Duparc, F Dujardin.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This pilot series sought to assess the use of external ultrasound stimulation (Exogen™) in the treatment of femoral or tibial non-union.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A continuous retrospective study was conducted from 2004 to 2009. It included patients with a non-united fracture or osteotomy at 6 months or more post-surgery, with less than 10mm inter-fragment gap. Daily 20-min ultrasound sessions were continued until bone healing was achieved or for a maximum 6-month duration. Radio-clinical control was performed at months 3 and 6; treatment compliance and transmitter positioning were checked at each follow-up visit.
RESULTS: Sixty non-unions were included in the series. One patient was excluded for early material breakage. Mean fracture-to-surgery interval was 271 days. The 6-month consolidation rate was 88%. There was no loss to follow-up. Mean ultrasound treatment duration was 151 days (range, 90-240 days). Bone healing correlated significantly with stability of the internal fixation assembly (P=0.01). The seven cases of failure included four fixations,considered unstable at inclusion, one femoral non-union associated with BMI 45 and one inadequate subchondral roughening (at the time of arthrodesis). There was a significant difference in delay to non-union treatment start between the groups with (251 days) and without (420 days) bone healing. DISCUSSION: The present results are in line with the literature. The main prognostic factors were fracture fixation stability, short time to treatment, and inter-fragment gap less than 10mm. Bone healing rates in the literature are around 80% for non-union treated at around 6 months, versus 60% for more than 12 months' delay. Factors such as gender, bone site, smoking, numbers of previous operations or type of osteosynthesis do not impact consolidation. External treatment offers an alternative to traditional surgery (graft, or bone-marrow concentrate or bone morphogenetic protein injection), provided that the fracture fixation is stable. Bone healing rates are better, and the procedure is non-invasive. External treatment results using ultrasound are similar to those using electromagnetic fields; the main difference lies in treatment session duration, which is 20 min for ultrasound, versus 3 hours for electromagnetic fields. Active patient commitment is vital, as the treatment is delivered at home, although the machine is equipped with a monitor to count treatment cycles.
CONCLUSION: The 88% bone healing rate supports advocating first-line implementation in non-union of less than 10mm with stable osteosynthesis. This rate is higher than in traditional surgery, with a unit cost at least 60% lower: €1772 for external therapy, versus €4480 for decortication with or without fracture fixation exchange (itemized 08c50 under the French healthcare treatment coding system). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. Retrospective therapeutic study.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22424956     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  14 in total

1.  Carpal scaphoid non-union treatment: a retrospective trial comparing simple retrograde percutaneous screw fixation versus percutaneous screw fixation plus pulsed electromagnetic fields (Physiostim®).

Authors:  Alexis Pereira; Juan José Hidalgo Díaz; Maurise Saur; Santiago Salazar Botero; Sybille Facca; Philippe Liverneaux
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-04-11

2.  Low intensity pulsed ultrasound in the treatment of long bone nonunions: Evaluation of cytokine expression as a tool for objectifying nonunion therapy.

Authors:  Arash Moghaddam; Timur Mert Yildirim; Fabian Westhauser; Wolfgang Danner; Tyler Swing; Thomas Bruckner; Bahram Biglari
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-07-02

Review 3.  Emerging non-cancer applications of therapeutic ultrasound.

Authors:  Meaghan A O'Reilly; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.914

Review 4.  Bone-Targeting Systems to Systemically Deliver Therapeutics to Bone Fractures for Accelerated Healing.

Authors:  Jeffery J Nielsen; Stewart A Low
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 5.  Development of controlled drug delivery systems for bone fracture-targeted therapeutic delivery: A review.

Authors:  Yuchen Wang; Maureen R Newman; Danielle S W Benoit
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 5.571

6.  Can low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) be used as an alternative to revision surgery for patients with non-unions following fracture fixation?

Authors:  Vidhi Adukia; Zahra Al-Hubeshy; Jitendra Mangwani
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-11-21

7.  Constructing the toolbox: Patient-specific genetic factors of altered fracture healing.

Authors:  Hicham Drissi; David N Paglia; Farhang Alaee; Ryu Yoshida
Journal:  Genes Dis       Date:  2014-12-01

8.  Failed treatment of long bone nonunions with low intensity pulsed ultrasound.

Authors:  Bahram Biglari; Timur Mert Yildirim; Tyler Swing; Thomas Bruckner; Wolfgang Danner; Arash Moghaddam
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) use for the management of instrumented, infected, and fragility non-unions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of healing proportions.

Authors:  Ross Leighton; Mark Phillips; Mohit Bhandari; Robert Zura
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Treatment of ununited femoral neck fractures in young adults using low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: Report of 2 cases.

Authors:  Sang Yang Lee; Takahiro Niikura; Takashi Iwakura; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.