Literature DB >> 22424550

Cooperative stabilization of microtubule dynamics by EB1 and CLIP-170 involves displacement of stably bound P(i) at microtubule ends.

Manu Lopus1, Cristina Manatschal, Ruben M Buey, Saša Bjelić, Herbert P Miller, Michel O Steinmetz, Leslie Wilson.   

Abstract

End binding protein 1 (EB1) and cytoplasmic linker protein of 170 kDa (CLIP-170) are two well-studied microtubule plus-end-tracking proteins (+TIPs) that target growing microtubule plus ends in the form of comet tails and regulate microtubule dynamics. However, the mechanism by which they regulate microtubule dynamics is not well understood. Using full-length EB1 and a minimal functional fragment of CLIP-170 (ClipCG12), we found that EB1 and CLIP-170 cooperatively regulate microtubule dynamic instability at concentrations below which neither protein is effective. By use of small-angle X-ray scattering and analytical ultracentrifugation, we found that ClipCG12 adopts a largely extended conformation with two noninteracting CAP-Gly domains and that it formed a complex in solution with EB1. Using a reconstituted steady-state mammalian microtubule system, we found that at a low concentration of 250 nM, neither EB1 nor ClipCG12 individually modulated plus-end dynamic instability. Higher concentrations (up to 2 μM) of the two proteins individually did modulate dynamic instability, perhaps by a combination of effects at the tips and along the microtubule lengths. However, when low concentrations (250 nM) of EB1 and ClipCG12 were present together, the mixture modulated dynamic instability considerably. Using a pulsing strategy with [γ(32)P]GTP, we further found that unlike EB1 or ClipCG12 alone, the EB1-ClipCG12 mixture partially depleted the microtubule ends of stably bound (32)P(i). Together, our results suggest that EB1 and ClipCG12 act cooperatively to regulate microtubule dynamics. They further indicate that stabilization of microtubule plus ends by the EB1-ClipCG12 mixture may involve modification of an aspect of the stabilizing cap.
© 2012 American Chemical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22424550     DOI: 10.1021/bi300038t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  6 in total

Review 1.  The tubulin code and its role in controlling microtubule properties and functions.

Authors:  Carsten Janke; Maria M Magiera
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Mechanism of mitotic arrest induced by dolastatin 15 involves loss of tension across kinetochore pairs.

Authors:  Manu Lopus
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 3.  Regulation of Microtubule Growth and Catastrophe: Unifying Theory and Experiment.

Authors:  Hugo Bowne-Anderson; Anneke Hibbel; Jonathon Howard
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 20.808

4.  The NAP motif of activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP) regulates dendritic spines through microtubule end binding proteins.

Authors:  S Oz; O Kapitansky; Y Ivashco-Pachima; A Malishkevich; E Giladi; N Skalka; R Rosin-Arbesfeld; L Mittelman; O Segev; J A Hirsch; I Gozes
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 15.992

5.  α-tubulin tail modifications regulate microtubule stability through selective effector recruitment, not changes in intrinsic polymer dynamics.

Authors:  Jiayi Chen; Ekaterina Kholina; Agnieszka Szyk; Vladimir A Fedorov; Ilya Kovalenko; Nikita Gudimchuk; Antonina Roll-Mecak
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 13.417

6.  The taccalonolides and paclitaxel cause distinct effects on microtubule dynamics and aster formation.

Authors:  April L Risinger; Stephen M Riffle; Manu Lopus; Mary A Jordan; Leslie Wilson; Susan L Mooberry
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 27.401

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.