BACKGROUND: There have been numerous reports of techniques used for pectus bar removal after correction of pectus excavatum. We use 2 operating tables positioned perpendicular to each other in a T-shaped configuration with the patients thorax circumferentially exposed so the bar is removed in 1 motion without bending the bar. In this study, we report the results of this procedure. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing bar removal after repair of pectus excavatum at our institution from August 2000 to March 2010 was performed. RESULTS: There were 230 patients with a mean age of 16.7 years (range, 7.8-25.3 years) at bar removal. Mean operative time for bar removal was 28.6 minutes, and average estimated blood loss (EBL) was 9.5 mL (range, 5-400 mL). One patient demonstrated significant hemorrhage from the bar tract after bar removal, which was controlled with circumferential compression wrap. Calcification was noted in 11 patients, and chondroma, in 8 patients. Wound infection after bar removal occurred in 3% of patients. No patient required the bar to be bent into a straight configuration for removal. CONCLUSIONS: Removal of pectus bars using this 2-table T-configuration technique is safe, is time efficient, and obviates the need for bending the bar. Copyright Â
BACKGROUND: There have been numerous reports of techniques used for pectus bar removal after correction of pectus excavatum. We use 2 operating tables positioned perpendicular to each other in a T-shaped configuration with the patients thorax circumferentially exposed so the bar is removed in 1 motion without bending the bar. In this study, we report the results of this procedure. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing bar removal after repair of pectus excavatum at our institution from August 2000 to March 2010 was performed. RESULTS: There were 230 patients with a mean age of 16.7 years (range, 7.8-25.3 years) at bar removal. Mean operative time for bar removal was 28.6 minutes, and average estimated blood loss (EBL) was 9.5 mL (range, 5-400 mL). One patient demonstrated significant hemorrhage from the bar tract after bar removal, which was controlled with circumferential compression wrap. Calcification was noted in 11 patients, and chondroma, in 8 patients. Wound infection after bar removal occurred in 3% of patients. No patient required the bar to be bent into a straight configuration for removal. CONCLUSIONS: Removal of pectus bars using this 2-table T-configuration technique is safe, is time efficient, and obviates the need for bending the bar. Copyright Â
Authors: Ashwini Suresh Poola; Rebecca M Rentea; Katrina L Weaver; Shawn David St Peter Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2017-03-04 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Katherine W Gonzalez; Brian G A Dalton; Ashwini S Poola; E Marty Knott; Brendan Kurtz; Charles L Snyder; Shawn D St Peter; George W Holcomb Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2016-06-09 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Ara Shwan Media; Thomas Decker Christensen; Niels Katballe; Hans Kristian Pilegaard; Frank Vincenzo de Paoli Journal: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Date: 2021-07-26
Authors: Nicky Janssen; Jean H T Daemen; Omar Ashour; Luca van Hulst; Karel W E Hulsewé; Yvonne L J Vissers; Erik R de Loos Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2022-09 Impact factor: 3.005