Literature DB >> 22424281

Management of patients with refractory angina: Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Pain Society joint guidelines.

Michael McGillion1, Heather M Arthur, Allison Cook, Sandra L Carroll, J Charles Victor, Philippe L L'allier, E Marc Jolicoeur, Nelson Svorkdal, Joel Niznick, Kevin Teoh, Tammy Cosman, Barry Sessle, Judy Watt-Watson, Alexander Clark, Paul Taenzer, Peter Coyte, Louise Malysh, Carol Galte, James Stone.   

Abstract

Refractory angina (RFA) is a debilitating disease characterized by cardiac pain resistant to conventional treatments for coronary artery disease including nitrates, calcium-channel and β-adrenoceptor blockade, vasculoprotective agents, percutaneous coronary interventions, and coronary artery bypass grafting. The mortality rate of patients living with RFA is not known but is thought to be in the range of approximately 3%. These individuals suffer severely impaired health-related quality of life with recurrent and sustained pain, poor general health status, psychological distress, impaired role functioning, and activity restriction. Effective care for RFA sufferers in Canada is critically underdeveloped. These guidelines are predicated upon a 2009 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Position Statement which identified that underlying the problem of RFA management is the lack of a formalized, coordinated, interprofessional strategy between the cardiovascular and pain science/clinical communities. The guidelines are therefore a joint initiative of the CCS and the Canadian Pain Society (CPS) and make practice recommendations about treatment options for RFA that are based on the best available evidence. Concluding summary recommendations are also made, giving direction to future clinical practice and research on RFA management in Canada.
Copyright © 2012 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22424281     DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2011.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  23 in total

Review 1.  Transmyocardial laser revascularization versus medical therapy for refractory angina.

Authors:  Eduardo Briones; Juan Ramon Lacalle; Ignacio Marin-Leon; José-Ramón Rueda
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-27

2.  EECP improves markers of functional capacity regardless of underlying ranolazine therapy.

Authors:  Sanaz Ziad; Jamil Malik; Obinna Isiguzo; Lang Xu; Leqi Chen; Annette Cox; Sachin A Shah
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2020-12-15

Review 3.  New Advances in the Management of Refractory Angina Pectoris.

Authors:  Kevin Cheng; Ranil de Silva
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2018-08

Review 4.  Management of Refractory Angina Pectoris.

Authors:  Kevin Cheng; Paul Sainsbury; Michael Fisher; Ranil de Silva
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2016-12

Review 5.  [Chronic chest pain].

Authors:  G Görge; D Grandt; W Häuser
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  Effect and Safety of Guanxinning Tablet () for Stable Angina Pectoris Patients with Xin (Heart)-Blood Stagnation Syndrome: A Randomized, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ming-Yue Sun; Yang Miao; Min Jin; Yao-Rong Dong; Shu-Rong Liu; Mu-Lan Wang; Rui Gao
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 1.978

7.  A prospective study of patients with refractory angina: outcomes and the role of high-sensitivity troponin T.

Authors:  Nilson T Poppi; Luís H W Gowdak; Luciana O C Dourado; Eduardo L Adam; Thiago N P Leite; Bruno M Mioto; José E Krieger; Luiz A M César; Alexandre C Pereira
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 8.  Treatment of refractory angina in patients not suitable for revascularization.

Authors:  Timothy D Henry; Daniel Satran; E Marc Jolicoeur
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 9.  Impact of Cell Therapy on Myocardial Perfusion and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Angina Refractory to Medical Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Abdur Rahman Khan; Talha A Farid; Asif Pathan; Avnish Tripathi; Shahab Ghafghazi; Marcin Wysoczynski; Roberto Bolli
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 17.367

10.  A phase II, sham-controlled, double-blinded study testing the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  E Marc Jolicœur; Shmuel Banai; Timothy D Henry; Marc Schwartz; Serge Doucet; Christopher J White; Elazer Edelman; Stefan Verheye
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.