Literature DB >> 22424204

Broad stance conditions change postural control and postural sway.

Cédrick T Bonnet1.   

Abstract

Intuitively, a broad stance (i.e., standing with the feet farther apart than usual) should significantly improve postural stability. However, this intuition was not confirmed in quiet stance. Hence, a motion analysis system (markers attached to the trunk and head) and a force platform were used to investigate 13 healthy, young adults who performed 8 trials in standard and broad stances. In broad stance, the medialateral center of pressure (COP) sway mean power frequency was expected to be greater, whereas the variability (standard deviation) of COP, head, and trunk sway and the mean velocity of head and trunk sway was expected to be significantly lower. Accordingly, adoption of a broad stance significantly increased the medialateral mean power frequency of COP sway; decreased the standard deviation of medialateral COP, trunk, and head sway; and decreased the medialateral mean velocity of head sway. A broad stance was also associated with lower variability for head and COP sways in the anteroposterior axis. Unexpectedly, an effect of trial repetition was found for the variability of medialateral trunk sway. This was probably due to the break halfway through the study. In practical terms, broad stance conditions can improve postural control in the medialateral and anteroposterior axes.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22424204     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2012.654526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  5 in total

1.  Three components of postural control associated with pushing in symmetrical and asymmetrical stance.

Authors:  Yun-Ju Lee; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of asymmetrical stance and movement on body rotation in pushing.

Authors:  Yun-Ju Lee; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Differences in static postural control between top level male volleyball players and non-athletes.

Authors:  Dorota Borzucka; Krzysztof Kręcisz; Zbigniew Rektor; Michał Kuczyński
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Incongruity of Geometric and Spectral Markers in the Assessment of Body Sway.

Authors:  Stefania Sozzi; Shashank Ghai; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  Modulation of visually evoked postural responses by contextual visual, haptic and auditory information: a 'virtual reality check'.

Authors:  Georg F Meyer; Fei Shao; Mark D White; Carl Hopkins; Antony J Robotham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.