Julie B Schnur1, Guy H Montgomery. 1. Department of Oncological Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1425 Madison Avenue, Box 1130, New York, NY 10029, USA. julie.schnur@mssm.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In the cancer setting, e-counseling interventions may be uniquely beneficial as they spare patients the cost and burden of traveling to a hospital or clinic for psychosocial care. However, the prevalence of e-counseling among psychosocial cancer care providers is unknown, as are the training needs with regard to e-counseling among this group of professionals. Thus, our group conducted an online professional training needs assessment with psychosocial cancer care providers. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Participants (n=120) were recruited from the listservs of the Health Psychology Division of the American Psychological Association, the Society of Behavioral Medicine-Cancer Special Interest Group, the American Psychosocial Oncology Society, and the Association of Oncology Social Work. All completed a 14-item online survey. RESULTS: Although 84% of participants stated that e-counseling could be important to their clinical work with cancer patients and survivors, 88% reported that they did not have the skills to effectively conduct e-counseling, and 81% reported that there were no adequate e-counseling educational opportunities. When asked about future training opportunities, participants reported a preference for online training versus live training (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results highlight the need for online training programs in e-counseling for psychosocial cancer care providers. The training of psychosocial cancer care providers in e-counseling is a critical first step towards increasing implementation of e-counseling interventions and using the Internet to deliver effective interventions to cancer patients in need.
OBJECTIVE: In the cancer setting, e-counseling interventions may be uniquely beneficial as they spare patients the cost and burden of traveling to a hospital or clinic for psychosocial care. However, the prevalence of e-counseling among psychosocial cancer care providers is unknown, as are the training needs with regard to e-counseling among this group of professionals. Thus, our group conducted an online professional training needs assessment with psychosocial cancer care providers. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Participants (n=120) were recruited from the listservs of the Health Psychology Division of the American Psychological Association, the Society of Behavioral Medicine-Cancer Special Interest Group, the American Psychosocial Oncology Society, and the Association of Oncology Social Work. All completed a 14-item online survey. RESULTS: Although 84% of participants stated that e-counseling could be important to their clinical work with cancerpatients and survivors, 88% reported that they did not have the skills to effectively conduct e-counseling, and 81% reported that there were no adequate e-counseling educational opportunities. When asked about future training opportunities, participants reported a preference for online training versus live training (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the results highlight the need for online training programs in e-counseling for psychosocial cancer care providers. The training of psychosocial cancer care providers in e-counseling is a critical first step towards increasing implementation of e-counseling interventions and using the Internet to deliver effective interventions to cancerpatients in need.
Authors: Cherise B Harrington; Jennifer A Hansen; Michal Moskowitz; Briana L Todd; Michael Feuerstein Journal: Int J Psychiatry Med Date: 2010 Impact factor: 1.210
Authors: Barbara L Andersen; William B Farrar; Deanna M Golden-Kreutz; Ronald Glaser; Charles F Emery; Timothy R Crespin; Charles L Shapiro; William E Carson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-09-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lyn W Freeman; Rebecca White; Chelsea G Ratcliff; Sue Sutton; Mary Stewart; J Lynn Palmer; Judith Link; Lorenzo Cohen Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2014-08-22 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Ingrid C Cnossen; Cornelia F van Uden-Kraan; Rico N P M Rinkel; Ijke J Aalders; Cees J T de Goede; Remco de Bree; Patricia Doornaert; Derek H F Rietveld; Johannes A Langendijk; Birgit I Witte; C Rene Leemans; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 5.428