A smoking gun is probably the most dramatic and iconic evidence of a crime. The concept of the smoking gun originated in a Sherlock Holmes story and then languished until it exploded into awareness during the impeachment hearings of Richard Nixon. As now understood, a smoking gun is an incontrovertible piece of evidence to establish a crime and even identify the perpetrator. This is especially true if the gun, sulfurous fumes streaming from the barrel, resides in the hand of a suspect, the murder victim bleeding nearby.In rheumatology as in all of medicine, investigators are forever searching for the smoking guns of pathogenesis. The identification of such guns, especially when found at the crime scene (such as a kidney biopsy), can delineate the mechanism of tissue injury as well as suggest new targets of therapy. Smoking guns in medicine can be very elusive, however, and cold cases abound. Assembling a case beyond a reasonable doubt can require a multitude of in vitro and in vivo studies, including treatment trials in animal models as well as patients.In the previous issue of Arthritis Research & Therapy, Zickert and colleagues [1] provided important new evidence implicating high-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) as a mediator of lupus nephritis, and the enhanced expression of HMGB1 is perhaps a smoking gun in the pathogenesis of a very complicated disease. As the data presented indicate, levels of HMGB1 are elevated in the blood of patients with lupus nephritis; furthermore, renal biopsies showed increased HMGB1 expression in the mesangium and endothelium. The elevations of HMGB1 in blood occurred in patients with different histopathological forms of lupus nephritis but, interestingly, did not vary much over time or with treatment [1].These observations are important in view of the biological properties of HMGB1. HMGB1 is a prototype alarmin and, indeed, the prime example of this class of immune mediator. In other terminology, HMGB1 is a DAMP (damage-associated molecular pattern). The immune activities of HMGB1 are perhaps surprising since HMGB1 is a nuclear molecule ubiquitously expressed in cells. In its usual location, HMGB1 can bind DNA as an architectural element for chromatin structure; once released from cells, however, HMGB1 acquires a new identity and displays potent and varied immunological activities. This release can occur during immune cell activation as well as cell death, whether apoptosis or necrosis [2].Along with other studies on systemic lupus erythematosus [3-5], the evidence for a central role of HMGB1 in lupus pathogenesis is strong but nevertheless circumstantial. One of the difficulties in making the case watertight concerns the complex biology of HMGB1. While HMGB1 has immunological activity, the extent of such activity varies significantly depending on its structure, including the redox state of cysteine (C) residues at positions 23, 45, and 106. With pure HMGB1, activity requires a C106 thiol and a C23-45 disulfide bond to induce activation of nuclear factor-kappa-B. With these modifications, HMGB1 can bind to Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) to stimulate responses but the oxidized form lacks such activity [6,7]. Thus, the finding of HMGB1 in the blood or tissue does not prove that it is functionally active.A further complexity concerns the manner in which HMGB1 stimulates inflammation. While active by itself depending on redox state, HMGB1 can also function in concert with cytokines such as interleukin-1 (IL-1). These complexes can stimulate responses through the cytokine receptor to dramatically boost immunostimulatory activity [8,9]. Similarly, HMGB1 can form complexes with PAMPs (pathogen-associated molecular patterns) such as lipopolysaccharide or CpG DNA to act via a TLR. Thus, the finding of high levels of HMGB1 in the blood or tissue is the beginning, not the end, of the story. In the absence of a partner in crime such as IL-1 or lipopolysaccharide, the effect of this molecule may be limited depending on the status of the cysteines [10].As is now recognized, HMGB1 emanates from cells during activation, necrosis, and apoptosis. Whereas HMGB1 from activated and necrotic cells has alarmin activity, HMGB1 released during apoptosis may lack such activity because of oxidation [7]. Since tissue injury (for example, ischemia) can lead to apoptosis and therefore HMGB1 release, the presence of extracellular HMGB1 may denote the effects of injury rather than establish the cause. In this regard, HMGB1 can be a component of immune complexes in lupus, likely reflecting its interaction with DNA that emerges from dead or dying cells [4,5]. The role of HMGB1 in nephritis as opposed to dendritic cell activation is not yet clear, although, as shown in the current study, the finding of HMGB1 in the mesangium may signify immune deposition; in this case, the activation of the complement system, rather than any direct effect of HMGB1 itself, may be the key event in inciting nephritis.HMGB1 has generated great interest as a new target of immununosuppressive therapy since, in animal models of shock and arthritis, blocking the action of HMGB1 can be strikingly beneficial [2]. Such studies are awaited in lupus. Only then will it be possible to know whether the HMGB1 gun in lupus nephritis is smoking or just smoldering.
Authors: Huan Yang; Peter Lundbäck; Lars Ottosson; Helena Erlandsson-Harris; Emilie Venereau; Marco E Bianchi; Yousef Al-Abed; Ulf Andersson; Kevin J Tracey; Daniel J Antoine Journal: Mol Med Date: 2012-03-30 Impact factor: 6.354
Authors: Jane Tian; Ana Maria Avalos; Su-Yau Mao; Bo Chen; Kannaki Senthil; Herren Wu; Peggy Parroche; Stacey Drabic; Douglas Golenbock; Cherilyn Sirois; Jing Hua; Ling Ling An; Laurent Audoly; Greg La Rosa; Angelika Bierhaus; Peter Naworth; Ann Marshak-Rothstein; Mary K Crow; Katherine A Fitzgerald; Eicke Latz; Peter A Kiener; Anthony J Coyle Journal: Nat Immunol Date: 2007-04-08 Impact factor: 25.606
Authors: Isabel García-Arnandis; Maria Isabel Guillén; Francisco Gomar; Jean-Pierre Pelletier; Johanne Martel-Pelletier; Maria José Alcaraz Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2010-08-27 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Vilma Urbonaviciute; Barbara G Fürnrohr; Silke Meister; Luis Munoz; Petra Heyder; Francesco De Marchis; Marco E Bianchi; Carsten Kirschning; Hermann Wagner; Angelo A Manfredi; Joachim R Kalden; Georg Schett; Patrizia Rovere-Querini; Martin Herrmann; Reinhard E Voll Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2008-12-08 Impact factor: 14.307