Literature DB >> 22423548

Sensory gating-out and gating-in in normal and schizophrenic participants.

Lingli Hu1, Nash N Boutros, Ben H Jansen.   

Abstract

In contrast to sensory gating, the brain's ability to re-respond to relevant stimuli and the potential differences between healthy and schizophrenic participants have not been studied in great detail. Here, we explore what auditory paradigms are useful to measure this re-responding ability. Evoked potentials (EPs) were obtained from the Cz channel using 3 paired stimulus paradigms (pairs with equal stimuli {PE}, the second stimulus being lower {PL} or higher {PH} in frequency) and 2 short-train paradigms in which 5 identical stimuli were followed by a lower frequency stimulus (train lower {TL}) or higher frequency stimulus (train higher {TH}). Data were collected from 17 healthy control participants (NC) and 17 age and gender-matched patients with schizophrenia (SZ). Up to 4 data sets obtained on 4 different days were available for each participant. Ensemble averages were computed for each session, from which the P50, N100, and P200 latencies and amplitudes were obtained. No significant differences in amplitude or latency of the various EP components were found between the responses to the second stimulus obtained with the 5 paradigms. Neither did the responses to the fifth and sixth stimuli differ for the TL and TH paradigm, with the exception of the N100 latency of the fifth stimulus, which was longer for TH than TL for NC. Healthy participants had larger amplitudes and shorter latencies than the patients with schizophrenia for the responses to the first stimuli, with the latency differences continuing for the fifth and sixth response. Also, the amplitude and latency of the first response was larger than for the second response in both populations. In conclusion, none of the paradigms studied here, with the employed parameters, are useful to measure the re-responding ability of the brain. Also, the shorter latencies for the repeated stimulus suggest that the neural mechanism underlying attenuation of repeated stimuli is of a facilitating nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22423548     DOI: 10.1177/1550059411429524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin EEG Neurosci        ISSN: 1550-0594            Impact factor:   1.843


  5 in total

1.  Diminished auditory sensory gating during active auditory verbal hallucinations.

Authors:  Robert J Thoma; Andrew Meier; Jon Houck; Vincent P Clark; Jeffrey D Lewine; Jessica Turner; Vince Calhoun; Julia Stephen
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Mismatch Negativity and P50 Sensory Gating in Abstinent Former Cannabis Users.

Authors:  Samantha J Broyd; Lisa-marie Greenwood; Hendrika H van Hell; Rodney J Croft; Hannah Coyle; Ben Lee-Bates; Juanita Todd; Stuart J Johnstone; Patricia T Michie; Nadia Solowij
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.599

3.  Functional abnormalities in the cortical processing of sound complexity and musical consonance in schizophrenia: evidence from an evoked potential study.

Authors:  Kuan-Yi Wu; Ching-Wen Chao; Ching-I Hung; Wei-Hong Chen; Yung-Ting Chen; Sheng-Fu Liang
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.630

4.  Respiratory sensory gating measured by respiratory-related evoked potentials in generalized anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Pei-Ying S Chan; Chia-Hsiung Cheng; Shih-Chieh Hsu; Chia-Yih Liu; Paul W Davenport; Andreas von Leupoldt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-09

Review 5.  Sensory disturbances, inhibitory deficits, and the P50 wave in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Premysl Vlcek; Petr Bob; Jiri Raboch
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 2.570

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.