Literature DB >> 22422728

Safety and efficacy of balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty: a multicenter experience.

Ralf J Holzer1, Kimberlee Gauvreau, Jacqueline Kreutzer, Sara M Trucco, Alejandro Torres, Shabana Shahanavaz, Lisa Bergersen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty (BPV) is the treatment of choice for patients with pulmonary valve stenosis (PS); however, safety and efficacy outcomes are lacking in the current era.
METHODS: Demographic, procedural, and adverse event (AE) data were prospectively collected using a multicenter registry (C3PO) and cases performed between 02/07 and 06/10 at eight institutions. The registry was queried for cases of isolated BPV. Multivariable models were built to determine risk factors for procedure failure and adverse outcomes.
RESULTS: 211 cases were included (45%, <1 month). Procedural success was achieved in 91% procedures, being defined as one or more of the following: post-BPV peak systolic valvar gradient to < 25 mm Hg (88%), decrease in gradient by 50% (79%), or reduction of RV/systemic pressure ratio by 50% (45%). Procedural success was more common in neonates, when compared to older patients (96% vs. 87%, P = 0.03). Risk factors for procedural failure included moderate or severe pulmonary valve thickening (OR 2.9, CI 1-8.3), and presence of supravalve PS (OR 9.6, CI 2.7-33.8). Low severity AEs (levels 1-2) occurred in 9% of patients and higher severity AEs (levels 3-5) occurred in 3% of patient; there were no deaths. Risk factors for any AE (levels 1-5) were age below 1 month (OR 3.5, CI 1.3-8.9), as well as operator experience of less than 10 years (OR 3.8, CI 1.5-9.9).
CONCLUSIONS: Procedural success is common and AEs, especially higher severity AEs, are rare for BPV in patients with isolated PS. Results have improved considerably when compared to historical data.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22422728     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.23473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  8 in total

1.  Safety, Feasibility, Results, and Economic Impact of Common Interventional Procedures in a Low-Volume Region of the United States.

Authors:  Aaron Clem; Sami Awadallah; Zahid Amin
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Developing tools to measure quality in congenital catheterization and interventions: the congenital cardiac catheterization project on outcomes (C3PO).

Authors:  Nadia Chaudhry-Waterman; Sandra Coombs; Diego Porras; Ralf Holzer; Lisa Bergersen
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

3.  Case 5/2018 - Severe Pulmonary Valve Stenosis (PVS), Relieved by a Double-balloon Catheter, in a 68-year-old Woman.

Authors:  Edmar Atik; Alessandra Costa Barreto; Maria Angélica Binotto; Luiz Junya Kajita
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Immediate Therapeutic Outcomes and Medium-term Follow-up of Percutaneous Balloon Pulmonary Valvuloplasty in Infants with Pulmonary Valve Stenosis: A Single-center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Dian Hong; Ming-Yang Qian; Zhi-Wei Zhang; Shu-Shui Wang; Jun-Jie Li; Yi-Fan Li; Tian Liu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Simultaneous Percutaneous Interventional Treatment of Atrial Septal Defects and Pulmonary Valve Stenosis in Children Under the Guidance of Transoesophageal Echocardiography Alone: Preliminary Experiences.

Authors:  Xuning Lu; Ping Wen; Yuhang Liu; Quanwei Zhu; Ning Wang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-24

6.  The Comparison between the Echocardiographic Data to the Cardiac Catheterization Data on the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up in Patients Diagnosed as Pulmonary Valve Stenosis.

Authors:  Do Hoon Kim; Su-Jin Park; Jo Won Jung; Nam Kyun Kim; Jae Young Choi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2013-03-20

7.  Application of new balloon catheters in the treatment of congenital heart defects.

Authors:  Roland Fiszer; Małgorzata Szkutnik; Linda Litwin; Sebastian Smerdziński; Beata Chodór; Jacek Białkowski
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 1.426

Review 8.  What Interventional Cardiologists Are Still Leaving to the Surgeons?

Authors:  Worakan Promphan; Shakeel A Qureshi
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.418

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.