Literature DB >> 22422714

Vascular pressure monitorization for necessity of vascular augmentation in a rat extended abdominal perforator flap model.

Nazim Gümüş1, Muhammet Erkan, Ali Riza Erçöçen.   

Abstract

In case blood perfusion compromises, vascular enhancement with arterial supercharge or venous superdrainage can increase viability of the flap. In this study, vascular pressure monitorization was used in a rat extended abdominal perforator flap model to reveal intraoperative vascular compromise and the need for vascular augmentation. A rat abdominal perforator flap was designed, which was based on the right second cranial perforator of epigastric artery. Vascular pressures of the flap were monitored continuously for 60 min, by catheters placed in the right superficial inferior epigastric artery and vein. Forty rats were divided into four experimental groups, as follows: group 1 (n = 10, no vascular augmentation), group II (n = 10, arterial supercharge), group III (n = 10, venous superdrainage), and group IV (n = 10, arterial and venous augmentation). Arterial supercharge and/or venous superdrainage were performed by using the left superficial inferior epigastric artery and vein. After the rats were sacrificed on the 7th day, total flap area and necrotic regions were evaluated. Mean arterial blood pressure was found significantly lower (P < 0.05) and mean venous blood pressure was measured significantly higher (P < 0.05) in group I than the groups II, III, and IV. Flap survival area was also larger in the groups II, III, and IV than the group I (P < 0.05). The results of this experimental study demonstrate that arterial insufficiency and venous congestion are almost always present in the rat extended abdominal perforator flap model, similar to deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. When such an extended perforator flap is used, arterial and venous pressure monitorization may be considered as a tool to support intraoperative clinical findings to reveal the need of vascular augmentation and ascertain flap viability.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22422714     DOI: 10.1002/micr.21952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsurgery        ISSN: 0738-1085            Impact factor:   2.425


  2 in total

1.  The effects of optimizing blood inflow in the pedicle on perforator flap survival: A pilot study in a rat model.

Authors:  Radu Olariu; Helen Laura Moser; Ioana Lese; Dan Sabau; Alexandru Valentin Georgescu; Adriaan Ockert Grobbelaar; Mihai Adrian Constantinescu
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2020-05-15

2.  What's the remedy for the distal necrosis of DIEP flap, better venous drain or more arterial supply?

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Tingliang Wang; Jiao Wei; Jinguang He; Tao Wang; Ying Liu; Hua Xu; Jiasheng Dong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.