| Literature DB >> 22421064 |
Kotaro Hatta1, Taro Otachi, Yasuhiko Sudo, Hironori Kuga, Hiroshi Takebayashi, Hideaki Hayashi, Ryusuke Ishii, Masataka Kasuya, Tatsuro Hayakawa, Fumiyoshi Morikawa, Kazuya Hata, Mitsuru Nakamura, Chie Usui, Hiroyuki Nakamura, Toyoaki Hirata, Yutaka Sawa.
Abstract
We examined whether augmentation with olanzapine would be superior to increased risperidone dose among acute schizophrenia patients showing early non-response to risperidone. We performed a rater-blinded, randomized controlled trial at psychiatric emergency sites. Eligible patients were newly admitted patients with acute schizophrenia. Early response was defined as Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale score ≤3 following 2 weeks of treatment. Early non-responders were allocated to receive either augmentation with olanzapine (RIS+OLZ group) or increased risperidone dose (RIS+RIS group). The 78 patients who completed 2 weeks of treatment were divided into 52 early responders to risperidone and 26 early non-responders to risperidone (RIS+OLZ group, n=13; RIS+RIS group, n=13). No difference in the achievement of ≥50% improvement in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score was observed between RIS+OLZ and RIS+RIS groups. Although time to treatment discontinuation for any cause was significantly shorter in the RIS+RIS group (6.8 weeks [95% confidence interval, 5.2-8.4]) than in early responders to risperidone (8.6 weeks [7.9-9.3]; P=0.018), there was no significant difference between the RIS+OLZ group (7.9 weeks [6.3-9.5]) and early responders to risperidone. Secondary outcomes justify the inclusion of augmentation arms in additional, larger studies comparing strategies for early non-responders.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22421064 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.01.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychiatry Res ISSN: 0165-1781 Impact factor: 3.222