RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: A collegial relationship between prescribers and antimicrobial stewards, along with an appreciation of the importance of antimicrobial stewardship, is essential for optimal functioning of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). Programmatic adjustments based on feedback may be beneficial to the success of ASPs. The objective of this study is to assess the experience of house officers with the ASP and the effect of programmatic improvements. METHODS: A survey of house officers at an academic medical centre was conducted assessing their experience with the ASP before (2008) and after (2010) programmatic interventions were instituted. RESULTS: Of 225 house officer surveys sent, we received 97 responses (88% from medical doctors). The majority indicated that ASP was either very or somewhat important in fighting antibiotic resistance (100%), improving patient care (97%), preventing medication errors (91%) and containing health care costs (89%). Ninety-one per cent indicated either a very good or good educational experience with the ASP. The ASP often reminded respondents of a patient's allergy (31%), to adjust for renal function (78%), and 38% were prevented from making a medication error. Comparing 2008 and 2010, a higher proportion of respondents in 2010 said they had a very good or good educational experience with ASP [84% versus 98%, odds ratio (OR) = 8.40, P = 0.022] and a lower proportion of respondents reported confusion about ASP procedures (59% versus 39%, OR = 0.43, P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: House officer feedback resulted in ASP policy changes which improved the ASP experience.
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: A collegial relationship between prescribers and antimicrobial stewards, along with an appreciation of the importance of antimicrobial stewardship, is essential for optimal functioning of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP). Programmatic adjustments based on feedback may be beneficial to the success of ASPs. The objective of this study is to assess the experience of house officers with the ASP and the effect of programmatic improvements. METHODS: A survey of house officers at an academic medical centre was conducted assessing their experience with the ASP before (2008) and after (2010) programmatic interventions were instituted. RESULTS: Of 225 house officer surveys sent, we received 97 responses (88% from medical doctors). The majority indicated that ASP was either very or somewhat important in fighting antibiotic resistance (100%), improving patient care (97%), preventing medication errors (91%) and containing health care costs (89%). Ninety-one per cent indicated either a very good or good educational experience with the ASP. The ASP often reminded respondents of a patient's allergy (31%), to adjust for renal function (78%), and 38% were prevented from making a medication error. Comparing 2008 and 2010, a higher proportion of respondents in 2010 said they had a very good or good educational experience with ASP [84% versus 98%, odds ratio (OR) = 8.40, P = 0.022] and a lower proportion of respondents reported confusion about ASP procedures (59% versus 39%, OR = 0.43, P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: House officer feedback resulted in ASP policy changes which improved the ASP experience.
Authors: Forest W Arnold; L Clifford McDonald; R Scott Smith; David Newman; Julio A Ramirez Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2006-03-29 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Herman Goossens; Didier Guillemot; Matus Ferech; Benoit Schlemmer; Michiel Costers; Marije van Breda; Lee J Baker; Otto Cars; Peter G Davey Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2006-03-28 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Vilhjalmur A Arason; Johann A Sigurdsson; Helga Erlendsdottir; Sigurdur Gudmundsson; Karl G Kristinsson Journal: Microb Drug Resist Date: 2006 Impact factor: 3.431
Authors: Matthew H Samore; Marc Lipsitch; Stephen C Alder; Bassam Haddadin; Greg Stoddard; Jacquelyn Williamson; Katherine Sebastian; Karen Carroll; Onder Ergonul; Yehuda Carmeli; Merle A Sande Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2005-11-30 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Darren R Linkin; Neil O Fishman; J Richard Landis; Todd D Barton; Steven Gluckman; Jay Kostman; Joshua P Metlay Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2007-11-01 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: J Hofmann; M S Cetron; M M Farley; W S Baughman; R R Facklam; J A Elliott; K A Deaver; R F Breiman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1995-08-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: R Monina Klevens; Melissa A Morrison; Scott K Fridkin; Arthur Reingold; Susan Petit; Ken Gershman; Susan Ray; Lee H Harrison; Ruth Lynfield; Ghinwa Dumyati; John M Townes; Allen S Craig; Gregory Fosheim; Linda K McDougal; Fred C Tenover Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 6.883