Literature DB >> 22420929

Evaluating consistency in repeat surveys of injection drug users recruited by respondent-driven sampling in the Seattle area: results from the NHBS-IDU1 and NHBS-IDU2 surveys.

Richard D Burt1, Hanne Thiede.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared data from two respondent-driven sampling (RDS) surveys of Seattle-area injection drug users (IDU) to evaluate consistency in repeat RDS surveys.
METHODS: The RDS-adjusted estimates for 16 key sociodemographic, drug-related, sexual behavior, and HIV- and hepatitis C virus-related variables were compared in the 2005 and the 2009 National HIV Behavioral Surveillance system surveys (NHBS-IDU1 and NHBS-IDU2). Time trends that might influence the comparisons were assessed by the use of data from reported HIV cases in IDU, surveys of needle exchange users, and two previous IDU studies.
RESULTS: NHBS-IDU2 participants were more likely than NHBS-IDU1 participants to report older age, heroin as their primary injection drug, male-to-male sex, unprotected sex with a partner of nonconcordant HIV status, and to self-report HIV-positive status. NHBS-IDU2 participants were less likely to report residence in downtown Seattle, amphetamine injection, and a recent HIV test. Time trends among Seattle-area IDU in age, male-to-male sex, and HIV testing could have influenced these differences.
CONCLUSIONS: The number and magnitude of the estimated differences between the two RDS surveys appeared to describe materially different populations. This could be a result of changes in the characteristics of Seattle-area IDU over time, of accessing differing subpopulations of Seattle IDU, or of high variability in RDS measurements.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22420929      PMCID: PMC3338897          DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2012.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  18 in total

Review 1.  Street and network sampling in evaluation studies of HIV risk-reduction interventions.

Authors:  Salaam Semaan; Jennifer Lauby; Jon Liebman
Journal:  AIDS Rev       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 2.  Review of sampling hard-to-reach and hidden populations for HIV surveillance.

Authors:  Robert Magnani; Keith Sabin; Tobi Saidel; Douglas Heckathorn
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 3.  Variance estimation, design effects, and sample size calculations for respondent-driven sampling.

Authors:  Matthew J Salganik
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  Subpopulations of illicit drug users reached by targeted street outreach and respondent-driven sampling strategies: implications for research and public health practice.

Authors:  Abby E Rudolph; Natalie D Crawford; Carl Latkin; Robert Heimer; Ebele O Benjamin; Kandice C Jones; Crystal M Fuller
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Risk factors for nonfatal overdose at Seattle-area syringe exchanges.

Authors:  Lindsay M Jenkins; Caleb J Banta-Green; Charles Maynard; Susan Kingston; Michael Hanrahan; Joseph O Merrill; Phillip O Coffin
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.671

6.  Evaluating respondent-driven sampling in a major metropolitan area: Comparing injection drug users in the 2005 Seattle area national HIV behavioral surveillance system survey with participants in the RAVEN and Kiwi studies.

Authors:  Richard D Burt; Holly Hagan; Keith Sabin; Hanne Thiede
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.797

7.  Respondent-Driven Sampling: An Assessment of Current Methodology.

Authors:  Krista J Gile; Mark S Handcock
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2010-08

8.  Gay and bisexual men in Kampala, Uganda.

Authors:  Phoebe Kajubi; Moses R Kamya; H Fisher Raymond; Sanny Chen; George W Rutherford; Jeffrey S Mandel; Willi McFarland
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2007-10-30

9.  Possible increase in HIV and syphilis prevalence among men who have sex with men in Guangzhou, China: results from a respondent-driven sampling survey.

Authors:  Fei Zhong; Peng Lin; Huifang Xu; Ye Wang; Ming Wang; Qun He; Lirui Fan; Yan Li; Fang Wen; Yingru Liang; H Fisher Raymond; Jinkou Zhao
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2011-07

10.  Comparing respondent-driven sampling and targeted sampling methods of recruiting injection drug users in San Francisco.

Authors:  Alex H Kral; Mohsen Malekinejad; Jason Vaudrey; Alexis N Martinez; Jennifer Lorvick; Willi McFarland; H Fisher Raymond
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.671

View more
  19 in total

1.  Beyond surveillance: a role for respondent-driven sampling in implementation science.

Authors:  Sunil S Solomon; Gregory M Lucas; David D Celentano; Frangiscos Sifakis; Shruti H Mehta
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Increasing methamphetamine injection among non-MSM who inject drugs in King County, Washington.

Authors:  Sara Nelson Glick; Richard Burt; Kim Kummer; Joe Tinsley; Caleb J Banta-Green; Matthew R Golden
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  A social network-informed latent class analysis of patterns of substance use, sexual behavior, and mental health: Social Network Study III, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Authors:  Suellen Hopfer; Xianming Tan; John L Wylie
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The Where and How for Reaching Transgender Women and Men Who Have Sex with Men with HIV Prevention Services in Guatemala.

Authors:  William M Miller; William C Miller; Clare Barrington; Sharon S Weir; Sanny Y Chen; Michael E Emch; Audrey E Pettifor; Gabriela Paz-Bailey
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2017-12

5.  Comparison of Three Popular Methods for Recruiting Young Persons Who Inject Drugs for Interventional Studies.

Authors:  Melissa G Collier; Richard S Garfein; Jazmine Cuevas-Mota; Eyasu H Teshale
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.671

6.  Reduction in Needle Sharing Among Seattle-Area Injection Drug Users Across 4 Surveys, 1994-2013.

Authors:  Richard D Burt; Hanne Thiede
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Assessing differences in groups randomized by recruitment chain in a respondent-driven sample of Seattle-area injection drug users.

Authors:  Richard D Burt; Hanne Thiede
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  Comparing study populations of men who have sex with men: evaluating consistency within repeat studies and across studies in the Seattle area using different recruitment methodologies.

Authors:  Richard D Burt; Alexandra M Oster; Mathew R Golden; Hanne Thiede
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2014-04

9.  The Impact of Syringe Services Program Policy on Risk Behaviors Among Persons Who Inject Drugs in 3 US Cities, 2005-2015.

Authors:  Tanner Nassau; Alia Al-Tayyib; William T Robinson; Jennifer Shinefeld; Kathleen A Brady
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  Evidence for risk reduction among amphetamine-injecting men who have sex with men; results from national HIV behavioral surveillance surveys in the Seattle area 2008-2012.

Authors:  Richard D Burt; Hanne Thiede
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2014-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.