Literature DB >> 22420810

Life after the ban: an assessment of US syringe exchange programs' attitudes about and early experiences with federal funding.

Traci C Green1, Erika G Martin, Sarah E Bowman, Marita R Mann, Leo Beletsky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine whether syringe exchange programs (SEPs) currently receive or anticipate pursuing federal funding and barriers to funding applications following the recent removal of the long-standing ban on using federal funds for SEPs.
METHODS: We conducted a telephone-administered cross-sectional survey of US SEPs. Descriptive statistics summarized responses; bivariate analyses examined differences in pursuing funding and experiencing barriers by program characteristics.
RESULTS: Of the 187 SEPs (92.1%) that responded, 90.9% were legally authorized. Three received federal funds and 116 intended to pursue federal funding. Perceived federal funding barriers were common and included availability and accessibility of funds, legal requirements such as written police support, resource capacity to apply and comply with funding regulations, local political and structural organization, and concern around altering program culture. Programs without legal authorization, health department affiliation, large distribution, or comprehensive planning reported more federal funding barriers.
CONCLUSIONS: Policy implementation gaps appear to render federal support primarily symbolic. In practice, funding opportunities may not be available to all SEPs. Increased technical assistance and legal reform could improve access to federal funds, especially for SEPs with smaller capacity and tenuous local support.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22420810      PMCID: PMC3484785          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  9 in total

Review 1.  Needle exchange programs for the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus infection: epidemiology and policy.

Authors:  D Vlahov; D C Des Jarlais; E Goosby; P C Hollinger; P G Lurie; M D Shriver; S A Strathdee
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Making the case for laws that improve health: a framework for public health law research.

Authors:  Scott Burris; Alexander C Wagenaar; Jeffrey Swanson; Jennifer K Ibrahim; Jennifer Wood; Michelle M Mello
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Syringe exchange as a social movement: a case study of harm reduction in Oakland, California.

Authors:  R N Bluthenthal
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.164

4.  The roles of law, client race and program visibility in shaping police interference with the operation of US syringe exchange programs.

Authors:  Leo Beletsky; Lauretta E Grau; Edward White; Sarah Bowman; Robert Heimer
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 6.526

5.  An opportunity lost: HIV infections associated with lack of a national needle-exchange programme in the USA.

Authors:  P Lurie; E Drucker
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Doing harm reduction better: syringe exchange in the United States.

Authors:  Don C Des Jarlais; Courtney McKnight; Cullen Goldblatt; David Purchase
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  Estimating numbers of injecting drug users in metropolitan areas for structural analyses of community vulnerability and for assessing relative degrees of service provision for injecting drug users.

Authors:  Samuel R Friedman; Barbara Tempalski; Hannah Cooper; Theresa Perlis; Marie Keem; Risa Friedman; Peter L Flom
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.671

8.  Needle exchange decreases the prevalence of HIV-1 proviral DNA in returned syringes in New Haven, Connecticut.

Authors:  R Heimer; E H Kaplan; K Khoshnood; B Jariwala; E C Cadman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Environmental conditions, political economy, and rates of injection drug use in large US metropolitan areas 1992-2002.

Authors:  Eric T Roberts; Samuel R Friedman; Joanne E Brady; Enrique R Pouget; Barbara Tempalski; Sandro Galea
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 4.492

  9 in total
  10 in total

1.  Police Encounters Among Needle Exchange Clients in Baltimore: Drug Law Enforcement as a Structural Determinant of Health.

Authors:  Leo Beletsky; Jess Cochrane; Anne L Sawyer; Chris Serio-Chapman; Marina Smelyanskaya; Jennifer Han; Natanya Robinowitz; Susan G Sherman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Syringe confiscation as an HIV risk factor: the public health implications of arbitrary policing in Tijuana and Ciudad Juarez, Mexico.

Authors:  Leo Beletsky; Remedios Lozada; Tommi Gaines; Daniela Abramovitz; Hugo Staines; Alicia Vera; Gudelia Rangel; Jaime Arredondo; Steffanie A Strathdee
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  The case of a needle exchange policy debate in Fresno, California.

Authors:  Kris Clarke
Journal:  Crit Soc Policy       Date:  2015-10-05

4.  Integrating substance abuse treatment into HIV care: missed opportunities in the AIDS Drug Assistance Program.

Authors:  Erika G Martin; Karen H Wang
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.731

5.  Novel Routes of Potential Hepatitis C Virus Transmission among People Who Inject Drugs: Secondary Blood Exposures Related to Injection Drug Use.

Authors:  Jesse L Goldshear; Kelsey A Simpson; Alex H Kral; Lynn D Wenger; Ricky N Bluthenthal
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Pharmacists' role in harm reduction: a survey assessment of Kentucky community pharmacists' willingness to participate in syringe/needle exchange.

Authors:  Amie Goodin; Amanda Fallin-Bennett; Traci Green; Patricia R Freeman
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2018-01-25

7.  I could take the judgment if you could just provide the service: non-prescription syringe purchase experience at Arizona pharmacies, 2018.

Authors:  Beth E Meyerson; Carrie A Lawrence; Summer Dawn Cope; Steven Levin; Christopher Thomas; Lori Ann Eldridge; Haley B Coles; Nina Vadiei; Amy Kennedy
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2019-09-18

8.  Implementation and first-year operating costs of an academic medical center-based syringe services program.

Authors:  Tyler S Bartholomew; Hardik Patel; Kathryn McCollister; Daniel J Feaster; Hansel E Tookes
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2021-11-19

9.  Quantifying Syringe Exchange Program Operational Space in the District of Columbia.

Authors:  Sean T Allen; Monica S Ruiz; Jeff Jones
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2016-12

10.  Examining nonprescription syringe sales in Massachusetts and Rhode Island community pharmacies.

Authors:  Traci C Green; Thomas Stopka; Ziming Xuan; Tyler C Davis; Jesse Boggis; Adriane N Irwin; Mary Gray; Daniel M Hartung; Jeffrey Bratberg
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2021-03-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.