Literature DB >> 22420588

Misuse of the Mood Disorders Questionnaire as a case-finding measure and a critique of the concept of using a screening scale for bipolar disorder in psychiatric practice.

Mark Zimmerman1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Under-recognition of bipolar disorder (BD) is common and incurs significant costs for individuals and society. Clinicians are often encouraged to use screening instruments to help them identify patients with the disorder. The Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) is the most widely studied measure for this purpose. Some studies, however, have used the MDQ as a case-finding instrument rather than a screening scale. Such inappropriate use of screening scales risks distorting perceptions about many facets of BD, from its prevalence to its consequences.
METHODS: Studies using the MDQ were reviewed to identify those reports that have used the scale as a case-finding measure rather than a screening scale.
RESULTS: Multiple studies were identified in the BD literature that used the MDQ as a diagnostic proxy. The findings of these studies were misinterpreted because of the failure to make the distinction between screening and case-finding.
CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate conclusions have been drawn regarding the prevalence, morbidity, and diagnostic under-recognition of BD in studies that rely on the MDQ as a diagnostic proxy. A conceptual critique is offered against the use of self-administered screening questionnaires for the detection of BD in psychiatric settings.
© 2012 John Wiley and Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22420588     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.00994.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bipolar Disord        ISSN: 1398-5647            Impact factor:   6.744


  8 in total

1.  Positive and Negative Activation in the Mood Disorder Questionnaire: Associations With Psychopathology and Emotion Dysregulation in a Clinical Sample.

Authors:  Ryan W Carpenter; Kasey Stanton; Noah N Emery; Mark Zimmerman
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2019-05-29

2.  Extreme Appraisals of Internal States and Duration of Remission in Remitted Bipolar Patients.

Authors:  Ahmet Tosun; Zeynep Maçkali; Özlem Çağin Tosun; Aycan Kapucu Eryar; Warren Mansell
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 1.339

Review 3.  The presentation, recognition and management of bipolar depression in primary care.

Authors:  Joseph M Cerimele; Lydia A Chwastiak; Ya-Fen Chan; David A Harrison; Jürgen Unützer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Problematic boundaries in the diagnosis of bipolar disorder: the interface with borderline personality disorder.

Authors:  Mark Zimmerman; Theresa A Morgan
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 5.  The prevalence of bipolar disorder in primary care patients with depression or other psychiatric complaints: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joseph M Cerimele; Lydia A Chwastiak; Sherry Dodson; Wayne J Katon
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.386

Review 6.  The prevalence of bipolar disorder in general primary care samples: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joseph M Cerimele; Lydia A Chwastiak; Sherry Dodson; Wayne J Katon
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.238

7.  Relationship between Childhood Maltreatment, Suicidality, and Bipolarity: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Young-Min Park
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Improving the Screening Instrument of Bipolar Spectrum Disorders: Weighted Korean Version of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire.

Authors:  Narei Hong; Won-Myong Bahk; Bo-Hyun Yoon; Kyung Joon Min; Young Chul Shin; Duk-In Jon
Journal:  Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 2.582

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.