Literature DB >> 22419394

Transition analysis: a validation study with known-age modern American skeletons.

George R Milner1, Jesper L Boldsen.   

Abstract

Transition Analysis-a recent skeletal age-estimation procedure (Boldsen et al.: Paleodemography: age distributions from skeletal samples (2002) 73-106)-is evaluated using 252 known-age modern American males and females from the Bass Donated Collection and Mercyhurst forensic cases. The pubic symphysis worked best for estimating age, followed by the sacroiliac joint and cranial sutures. Estimates based on all skeletal characteristics are influenced by the choice of prior distribution, although its effect is dwarfed by both the inaccuracy and imprecision of age estimates. Age intervals are narrowest for young adults, but are surprisingly short in old age as well. When using an informative prior distribution, the greatest uncertainty occurs from the late 40s into the 70s. Transition Analysis estimates do not perform as well as experience-based assessments, indicating the existing procedure is too narrowly focused on commonly used pelvic and cranial structures.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22419394     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  14 in total

1.  Temporal, spatial and gender-based dietary differences in middle period San Pedro de Atacama, Chile: A model-based approach.

Authors:  William J Pestle; Mark Hubbe; Christina Torres-Rouff; Gonzalo Pimentel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Age estimation from the acetabulum in South African black males.

Authors:  D Botha; S Pretorius; J Myburgh; M Steyn
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Obtaining appropriate interval estimates for age when multiple indicators are used: evaluation of an ad-hoc procedure.

Authors:  Steffen Fieuws; Guy Willems; Sara Larsen-Tangmose; Niels Lynnerup; Jesper Boldsen; Patrick Thevissen
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  A test and analysis of Calce (2012) method for skeletal age-at-death estimation using the acetabulum in a modern skeletal sample.

Authors:  David Navega; Maria Godinho; Eugénia Cunha; Maria Teresa Ferreira
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Cranial vault trauma and selective mortality in medieval to early modern Denmark.

Authors:  Jesper L Boldsen; George R Milner; Svenja Weise
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Technical note: preliminary insight into a new method for age-at-death estimation from the pubic symphysis.

Authors:  Andrés Castillo; Ignasi Galtés; Santiago Crespo; Xavier Jordana
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  Correlation of the human pubic symphysis surface with age-at-death: a novel quantitative method based on a bandpass filter.

Authors:  Guillermo Bravo Morante; Fred L Bookstein; Barbara Fischer; Katrin Schaefer; Inmaculada Alemán Aguilera; Miguel Cecilio Botella López
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  Performance of three mathematical models for estimating age-at-death from multiple indicators of the adult skeleton.

Authors:  Nicolene Jooste; Samantha Pretorius; Maryna Steyn
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 2.686

9.  DXAGE 2.0 - adult age at death estimation using bone loss in the proximal femur and the second metacarpal.

Authors:  Francisco Curate; David Navega; Eugénia Cunha; João d'Oliveira Coelho
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.791

Review 10.  Demographic uniformitarianism: the theoretical basis of prehistoric demographic research and its cross-disciplinary challenges.

Authors:  Jennifer C French; Andrew T Chamberlain
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.