Literature DB >> 22418763

Is sampling transitional zone in patients who had prior negative prostate biopsy necessary?

Bayram Dogan1, Ege Can Serefoglu, Ali Fuat Atmaca, Abdullah Erdem Canda, Ziya Akbulut, M Derya Balbay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the necessity of transitional zone sampling of the prostate during repeat prostate biopsy procedures.
METHODS: Patients treated for lower urinary tract symptoms with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) from April 2004 to July 2009 whom had at least 1 negative prostate biopsy prior to this treatment were chosen as the study group. A histopathological analysis of surgical specimens was employed to determine cancer detection rates.
RESULTS: A total of 72 patients with the mean age of 66.1, mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 10.4 ng/mL and mean prostate volume of 63.2 cc were included. Of the patients, 50 had 1 biopsy set, 17 had 2 sets, 4 had 3 sets and 1 patient had 4 sets of consecutive biopsies. All biopsy results were negative for prostate cancer. After the analysis of surgical specimens obtained during TURP, cancer was detected in 3 patients (4.2%). Transitional zone sampling during prostate biopsies did not significantly improve the cancer detection rate. Transitional zone sampling was performed in 29 biopsies taken from 20 patients, one of whom (5%) had prostate cancer. The remaining 71 biopsies were taken from 52 patients without transitional zone sampling, and cancer was detected in 2 (3.8%) of them.
CONCLUSIONS: Since no significant difference was observed between patient groups (those with and those without transitional zone biopsies) in the detection of prostate cancer in the transitional zone, strategies for increasing the number of cores taken from transitional zone during repeat biopsies should be reconsidered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22418763     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-012-0139-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  30 in total

1.  Re: The 20-core prostate biopsy protocol--a new gold standard?: V. Ravery, S. Dominique, X. Panhard, M. Toublanc, L. Boccon-Gibod and L. Boccon-Gibod. J Urol 2008; 179: 504-507.

Authors:  E C Serefoglu; A T Ozdemir; M D Balbay
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Nicolas Mottet; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filliberto Zattoni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Are transition zone biopsies still necessary to improve prostate cancer detection? Results from the tyrol screening project.

Authors:  Alexandre E Pelzer; Jasmin Bektic; Andreas P Berger; Ethan J Halpern; Florian Koppelstätter; Andrea Klauser; Peter Rehder; Wolfgang Horninger; Georg Bartsch; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Prostate cancer detection by TURP after repeated negative saturation biopsy in patients with persistent suspicion of cancer: a case-control study on 75 consecutive patients.

Authors:  P Pepe; F Fraggetta; A Galia; G Grasso; F Aragona
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 5.  Cancer statistics, 2004.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Ram C Tiwari; Taylor Murray; Asma Ghafoor; Alicia Samuels; Elizabeth Ward; Eric J Feuer; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Prostate cancer detection rate in patients with repeated extended 21-sample needle biopsy.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Campos-Fernandes; Laurence Bastien; Nathalie Nicolaiew; Grégoire Robert; Stéphane Terry; Francis Vacherot; Laurent Salomon; Yves Allory; Dimitri Vordos; Andras Hoznek; René Yiou; Jean Jacques Patard; Claude Clément Abbou; Alexandre de la Taille
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Diagnostic yield of repeated transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies stratified by specific histopathologic diagnoses and prostate specific antigen levels.

Authors:  C G Roehrborn; G J Pickens; J S Sanders
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Detection of prostate cancer by TURP or open surgery in patients with previously negative transrectal prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Richard Zigeuner; Luigi Schips; Katja Lipsky; Marko Auprich; Michael Salfellner; Peter Rehak; Karl Pummer; Gerhart Hubmer
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  An extended 10-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy protocol improves the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Saadettin Yilmaz Eskicorapci; Dilek Ertoy Baydar; Cem Akbal; Mustafa Sofikerim; Mert Günay; Sinan Ekici; Haluk Ozen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate.

Authors:  K K Hodge; J E McNeal; M K Terris; T A Stamey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  2 in total

1.  Incidental prostate cancer in transurethral resection of prostate specimens in men aged up to 65 years.

Authors:  Marlon Perera; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Nayomi Perera; Damien Bolton; David Clouston
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2015-11-26

2.  Transperineal ultrasound-guided 12-core prostate biopsy: an extended approach to diagnose transition zone prostate tumors.

Authors:  Ming-Hua Yao; Li-Ling Zou; Rong Wu; Le-Hang Guo; Guang Xu; Juan Xie; Pei Li; Shuai Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.