| Literature DB >> 22418700 |
Nancy U Lin1, Eric P Winer, Duncan Wheatley, Lisa A Carey, Stephen Houston, David Mendelson, Pamela Munster, Laurie Frakes, Steve Kelly, Agustin A Garcia, Susan Cleator, Martina Uttenreuther-Fischer, Hilary Jones, Sven Wind, Richard Vinisko, Tamas Hickish.
Abstract
Afatinib is an oral, ErbB family blocker, which covalently binds and irreversibly blocks all kinase-competent ErbB family members. This phase II, open-label, single-arm study explored afatinib activity in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer patients progressing after trastuzumab treatment. Patients had stage IIIB/IV HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, with progression following trastuzumab or trastuzumab intolerance and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2. Patients received 50 mg afatinib once-daily until disease progression. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.0), with tumor assessments every 8 weeks. Forty-one patients were treated. Patients had received a median of three prior chemotherapy lines (range, 0-15) and 68.3% had received trastuzumab for >1 year. Four patients (10% of 41 treated; 11% of evaluable patients) had partial response. Fifteen patients (37% of 41) had stable disease as best response and 19 (46% of 41) achieved clinical benefit. Median progression-free survival was 15.1 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.1-16.7); median overall survival was 61.0 weeks (95% CI: 56.7-not evaluable). Most frequent common terminology criteria for adverse events grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (24.4%) and rash (9.8%). Afatinib monotherapy was associated with promising clinical activity in extensively pretreated HER2-positive breast cancer patients who had progressed following trastuzumab treatment.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22418700 PMCID: PMC3387495 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2003-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat ISSN: 0167-6806 Impact factor: 4.872
Baseline demographics (treated patients)
| Afatinib ( | |
|---|---|
| Age (years), median (range) | 54 (30–86) |
| ECOG performance status, | |
| 0 | 24 (59) |
| 1 | 14 (34) |
| 2 | 3 (7) |
| Progesterone receptor-positive, | 12 (29) |
| Estrogen receptor-positive, | 20 (49) |
| Duration of prior trastuzumab (months), | |
| ≤6 | 3 (7.3) |
| 6–12 | 10 (24.4) |
| 12–36 | 20 (48.8) |
| >36 | 8 (19.5) |
| Best response to trastuzumab, | |
| Complete response | 2 (4.9) |
| Partial response | 13 (31.7) |
| Stable disease | 13 (31.7) |
| Progressive disease | 9 (22.0) |
| Unknown | 2 (4.9) |
| Not applicable | 2 (4.9) |
| Number of prior chemotherapies | |
| Median | 3 |
| Range | 0–15 |
| Other prior therapies; | |
| Hormone | 24 (59) |
| Radiotherapy | 32 (78) |
| Surgery | 38 (93) |
| Immunotherapy | 23 (56) |
ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
Best response according to RECIST criteria
| Overall investigator assessment (best response) | Responsea | Median duration, weeks (range) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % All treated patients ( | % Evaluable patients ( | ||
| Clinical benefit (CR + PR + SD) | 19 | 46 | 54 | 17.1 (7.3–64.0) |
| PR | 4 | 10 | 11 | 12.0 (7.4–56.1) |
| SD | 15 | 37 | 43 | – |
| Progressive disease | 16 | 39 | 46 | – |
RECIST Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, CR complete response, PR partial response, SD stable disease
aSix patients were not evaluable for response as no post-baseline imaging measurements were available
Fig. 1Best RECIST response*. *30 patients had available tumor diameter measurements; five patients had no tumor diameter measurements available (two patients had fewer lesions measured than at baseline, three patients had no post-baseline measurements available, but new lesions documented). RECIST Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Fig. 2Progression-free survival (treated set)
Fig. 3Overall survival (treated set)
Drug-related adverse events according to CTCAE grade (total frequency >5% or grade ≥3), sorted according to frequency
|
| All treatment-related AEs | CTCAE gradea | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | ||
| Number of patients | 41 | 41 | 41 | 41 |
| Total with related AEs | 40 (97.6) | 3 (7.3) | 17 (41.5) | 20 (48.8) |
| Diarrhea | 37 (90.2) | 18 (43.9) | 9 (22.0) | 10 (24.4) |
| Rash | 27 (65.9) | 7 (17.1) | 16 (39.0) | 4 (9.8) |
| Fatigue | 17 (41.5) | 10 (24.4) | 7 (17.1) | 0 (0.0) |
| Nausea | 16 (39.0) | 9 (22.0) | 6 (14.6) | 1 (2.4) |
| Stomatitis | 15 (36.6) | 6 (14.6) | 6 (14.6) | 3 (7.3) |
| Vomiting | 14 (34.1) | 5 (12.2) | 6 (14.6) | 3 (7.3) |
| Dry mouth | 8 (19.5) | 8 (19.5) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Anorexia | 7 (17.1) | 3 (7.3) | 4 (9.8) | 0 (0.0) |
| Dermatitis acneiform | 7 (17.1) | 4 (9.8) | 3 (7.3) | 0 (0.0) |
| Epistaxis | 7 (17.1) | 7 (17.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Dry skin | 6 (14.6) | 5 (12.2) | 1 (2.4) | 0 (0.0) |
| Dysgeusia | 6 (14.6) | 6 (14.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Mucosal inflammation | 5 (12.2) | 3 (7.3) | 1 (2.4) | 1 (2.4) |
| Oral pain | 5 (12.2) | 4 (9.8) | 1 (2.4) | 0 (0.0) |
| Pruritus | 5 (12.2) | 4 (9.8) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.4) |
| Skin fissures | 5 (12.2) | 2 (4.9) | 2 (4.9) | 1 (2.4) |
| Anemia | 4 (9.8) | 1 (2.4) | 2 (4.9) | 1 (2.4) |
| Dehydration | 4 (9.8) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (4.9) | 2 (4.9) |
| Alopecia | 3 (7.3) | 3 (7.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Dyspnea | 3 (7.3) | 2 (4.9) | 1 (2.4) | 0 (0.0) |
| Headache | 3 (7.3) | 3 (7.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Keratoconjunctivitis sicca | 3 (7.3) | 2 (4.9) | 1 (2.4) | 0 (0.0) |
| Pain in extremity | 3 (7.3) | 1 (2.4) | 2 (4.9) | 0 (0.0) |
| Skin reaction | 2 (4.9) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.4) | 1 (2.4) |
| Hyponatremia | 1 (2.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.4) |
| Leukocytoclastic vasculitis | 1 (2.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.4) |
| Palmar plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome | 1 (2.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.4) |
| Vertigo | 1 (2.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.4) |
CTCAE common terminology criteria for adverse events, AE adverse event
aNo drug related CTCAE grade 4 events were reported