Literature DB >> 22418699

A randomized trial of combination anastrozole plus gefitinib and of combination fulvestrant plus gefitinib in the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer.

Robert W Carlson1, Anne O'Neill, Tatiana Vidaurre, Henry L Gomez, Sunil S Badve, George W Sledge.   

Abstract

EGFR signalling pathways appear involved in endocrine therapy resistance in breast cancer. This trial estimates the antitumor efficacy and toxicity of the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib in combination with anastrozole or fulvestrant in postmenopausal hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Subjects with estrogen receptor and/or PgR positive, metastatic breast cancer were randomized into this phase II study of gefitinib (initial dose was 500 mg orally daily, due to high rate of diarrhea, starting dose was reduced to 250 mg orally daily) with either anastrozole 1 mg daily or fulvestrant 250 mg every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit (complete responses plus partial responses plus stable disease for 6 months or longer). 141 eligible subjects were enrolled, 72 in the anastrozole plus gefitinib arm, and 69 in the fulvestrant plus gefitinib arm. Anastrozole plus gefitinib had a clinical benefit rate of 44% [95% confidence interval (CI) 33-57%] and fulvestrant plus gefitinib 41% (95% CI 29-53%). Median progression-free survival was 5.3 months (95% CI 3.1-10.4) versus 5.2 months (95% CI 2.9-8.2) for anastrozole plus gefitinib versus fulvestrant plus gefitinib, respectively. Median survival was 30.3 months (95% CI 21.2-38.9+) versus 23.9 months (95% CI 15.4-33.5) for anastrozole plus gefitinib versus fulvestrant plus gefitinib, respectively. In general, the toxicity is greater than expected for single agent endocrine therapy alone. Anastrozole plus gefitinib and fulvestrant plus gefitinib have similar clinical benefit rates in the treatment of estrogen and/or PgR positive metastatic breast cancer, and the rates of response are not clearly superior to gefitinib or endocrine therapy alone. Further studies of EGFR inhibition plus endocrine therapy do not appear warranted, but if performed should include attempts to identify biomarkers predictive of antitumor activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22418699      PMCID: PMC3587179          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-1997-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  22 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Static disease on anastrozole provides similar benefit as objective response in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  J F Robertson; A Howell; A Buzdar; M von Euler; D Lee
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer cells is accompanied by an enhanced motile and invasive phenotype: inhibition by gefitinib ('Iressa', ZD1839).

Authors:  Stephen Hiscox; Liam Morgan; Denise Barrow; Carol Dutkowskil; Alan Wakeling; Robert I Nicholson
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.150

4.  HER-2 amplification, HER-1 expression, and tamoxifen response in estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a southwest oncology group study.

Authors:  Grazia Arpino; Stephanie J Green; D Craig Allred; Dannika Lew; Silvana Martino; C Kent Osborne; Richard M Elledge
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Fulvestrant versus anastrozole for the treatment of advanced breast carcinoma in postmenopausal women: a prospective combined analysis of two multicenter trials.

Authors:  John F R Robertson; C Kent Osborne; Anthony Howell; Stephen E Jones; Louis Mauriac; Matthew Ellis; Ulrich R Kleeberg; Steven E Come; Ignace Vergote; Stan Gertler; Aman Buzdar; Alan Webster; Charles Morris
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Inhibition of HER1 signaling pathway enhances antitumor effect of endocrine therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Junichi Kurebayashi; Sumiko Okubo; Yutaka Yamamoto; Hiroshi Sonoo
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.239

7.  Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in breast cancer: association with response to endocrine therapy.

Authors:  R I Nicholson; R A McClelland; J M Gee; D L Manning; P Cannon; J F Robertson; I O Ellis; R W Blamey
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 8.  The clinical significance of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) in human breast cancer: a review on 5232 patients.

Authors:  J G Klijn; P M Berns; P I Schmitz; J A Foekens
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 9.  Sequential hormonal therapy for metastatic breast cancer after adjuvant tamoxifen or anastrozole.

Authors:  Robert W Carlson; I Craig Henderson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  The definition of the 'no change' category in patients treated with endocrine therapy and chemotherapy for advanced carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  A Howell; J Mackintosh; M Jones; J Redford; J Wagstaff; R A Sellwood
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1988-10
View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of breast cancer therapeutics: Breast tumour kinase's role in breast cancer and hope for breast tumour kinase targeted therapy.

Authors:  Haroon A Hussain; Amanda J Harvey
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

Review 2.  Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in breast cancer (Review).

Authors:  George Iancu; Dragos Serban; Cristinel Dumitru Badiu; Ciprian Tanasescu; Mihai Silviu Tudosie; Corneliu Tudor; Daniel Ovidiu Costea; Anca Zgura; Raluca Iancu; Danut Vasile
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Fulvestrant regulates epidermal growth factor (EGF) family ligands to activate EGF receptor (EGFR) signaling in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Xihong Zhang; Michael R Diaz; Douglas Yee
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Biological effects of fulvestrant on estrogen receptor positive human breast cancer: short, medium and long-term effects based on sequential biopsies.

Authors:  Amit Agrawal; John F R Robertson; Kwok L Cheung; Eleanor Gutteridge; Ian O Ellis; Robert I Nicholson; Julia M W Gee
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 5.  Review of hormone-based treatments in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer focusing on aromatase inhibitors and fulvestrant.

Authors:  Iben Kümler; Ann S Knoop; Christina A R Jessing; Bent Ejlertsen; Dorte L Nielsen
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2016-08-16

Review 6.  Accurate prediction of response to endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients: current and future biomarkers.

Authors:  Cigdem Selli; J Michael Dixon; Andrew H Sims
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 7.  Receptor tyrosine kinases: Characterisation, mechanism of action and therapeutic interests for bone cancers.

Authors:  Aude I Ségaliny; Marta Tellez-Gabriel; Marie-Françoise Heymann; Dominique Heymann
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 4.072

Review 8.  Delaying Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Adam M Brufsky
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2015-12-30

Review 9.  Treatment challenges for community oncologists treating postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  William J Gradishar
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 10.  Critical research gaps and translational priorities for the successful prevention and treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne A Eccles; Eric O Aboagye; Simak Ali; Annie S Anderson; Jo Armes; Fedor Berditchevski; Jeremy P Blaydes; Keith Brennan; Nicola J Brown; Helen E Bryant; Nigel J Bundred; Joy M Burchell; Anna M Campbell; Jason S Carroll; Robert B Clarke; Charlotte E Coles; Gary J R Cook; Angela Cox; Nicola J Curtin; Lodewijk V Dekker; Isabel dos Santos Silva; Stephen W Duffy; Douglas F Easton; Diana M Eccles; Dylan R Edwards; Joanne Edwards; D Evans; Deborah F Fenlon; James M Flanagan; Claire Foster; William M Gallagher; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Julia M W Gee; Andy J Gescher; Vicky Goh; Ashley M Groves; Amanda J Harvey; Michelle Harvie; Bryan T Hennessy; Stephen Hiscox; Ingunn Holen; Sacha J Howell; Anthony Howell; Gill Hubbard; Nick Hulbert-Williams; Myra S Hunter; Bharat Jasani; Louise J Jones; Timothy J Key; Cliona C Kirwan; Anthony Kong; Ian H Kunkler; Simon P Langdon; Martin O Leach; David J Mann; John F Marshall; Lesley Martin; Stewart G Martin; Jennifer E Macdougall; David W Miles; William R Miller; Joanna R Morris; Sue M Moss; Paul Mullan; Rachel Natrajan; James P B O'Connor; Rosemary O'Connor; Carlo Palmieri; Paul D P Pharoah; Emad A Rakha; Elizabeth Reed; Simon P Robinson; Erik Sahai; John M Saxton; Peter Schmid; Matthew J Smalley; Valerie Speirs; Robert Stein; John Stingl; Charles H Streuli; Andrew N J Tutt; Galina Velikova; Rosemary A Walker; Christine J Watson; Kaye J Williams; Leonie S Young; Alastair M Thompson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.