Literature DB >> 22417956

Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians sepsis treatment checklist: optimizing sepsis care in Canadian emergency departments.

Dennis Djogovic1, Robert Green, Robert Keyes, Sara Gray, Robert Stenstrom, David Sweet, Jonathan Davidow, Edward Patterson, David Easton, Shavaun MacDonald, Jonathan Gaudet, Michael R Kolber, David Lechelt, Daniel Howes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) sepsis guidelines created by the CAEP Critical Care Practice Committee (C4) and published in the Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine (CJEM) form the most definitive publication on Canadian emergency department (ED) sepsis care to date. Our intention was to identify which of the care items in this document are specifically necessary in the ED and then to provide these items in a tiered checklist that can be used by any Canadian ED practitioner.
METHODS: Practice points from the CJEM sepsis publication were identified to create a practice point list. Members of C4 then used a Delphi technique consensus process over May to October 2009 via e-mail to create a tiered checklist of sepsis care items that can or could be completed in a Canadian ED when caring for the septic shock patient. This checklist was then assessed for use by a survey of ED practitioners from varying backgrounds (rural ED, community ED, tertiary ED) from July to October 2010.
RESULTS: Twenty sepsis care items were identified in the CAEP sepsis guidelines. Fifteen items were felt to be necessary for ED care. Two levels of checklists were then created that can be used in a Canadian ED. Most ED physicians in community and tertiary care centres could complete all parts of the level I sepsis checklist. Rural centres often struggle with the ability to obtain lactate values and central venous access. Many items of the level II sepsis checklist could not be completed outside the tertiary care centre ED.
CONCLUSION: Sepsis care continues to be an integral and major part of the ED domain. Practice points for sepsis care that require specialized monitoring and invasive techniques are often limited to larger tertiary care EDs and, although heavily emphasized by many medical bodies, cannot be reasonably expected in all centres. When the resources of a centre limit patient care, transfer may be required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22417956     DOI: 10.2310/8000.2011.110610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CJEM        ISSN: 1481-8035            Impact factor:   2.410


  7 in total

1.  Inter-hospital transfer is associated with increased mortality and costs in severe sepsis and septic shock: An instrumental variables approach.

Authors:  Nicholas M Mohr; Karisa K Harland; Dan M Shane; Azeemuddin Ahmed; Brian M Fuller; James C Torner
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.425

2.  Double inter-hospital transfer in Sepsis patients presenting to the ED does not worsen mortality compared to single inter-hospital transfer.

Authors:  Maria D Arulraja; Morgan B Swanson; Nicholas M Mohr
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 3.425

3.  The effect of hospital volume on mortality in patients admitted with severe sepsis.

Authors:  Sajid Shahul; Michele R Hacker; Victor Novack; Ariel Mueller; Shahzad Shaefi; Bilal Mahmood; Syed Haider Ali; Daniel Talmor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Does utilization of an intubation safety checklist reduce omissions during simulated resuscitation scenarios: a multi-center randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kaitlin Hayman; Chantal Forristal; Norma Smith; Sameer Mal; Melanie Columbus; Nadia Farooki; Kristine Van Aarsen; Shelley McLeod; David Ouellette
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 2.410

5.  TELEmedicine as an intervention for sepsis in emergency departments: a multicenter, comparative effectiveness study (TELEvISED Study).

Authors:  Nicholas M Mohr; Karisa K Harland; Uche E Okoro; Brian M Fuller; Kalyn Campbell; Morgan B Swanson; Stephen Q Simpson; Edith A Parker; Luke J Mack; Amanda Bell; Katie DeJong; Brett Faine; Anne Zepeski; Keith Mueller; Elizabeth Chrischilles; Christopher R Carpenter; Michael P Jones; Marcia M Ward
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 1.744

6.  Effect of an Enhanced Paramedic Acute Stroke Treatment Assessment on Thrombolysis Delivery During Emergency Stroke Care: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Christopher I Price; Lisa Shaw; Saiful Islam; Mehdi Javanbakht; Alan Watkins; Peter McMeekin; Helen Snooks; Darren Flynn; Richard Francis; Rachel Lakey; Lou Sutcliffe; Graham McClelland; Joanne Lally; Catherine Exley; Helen Rodgers; Ian Russell; Luke Vale; Gary A Ford
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 18.302

7.  Cost-effectiveness of an enhanced Paramedic Acute Stroke Treatment Assessment (PASTA) during emergency stroke care: Economic results from a pragmatic cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Nawaraj Bhattarai; Christopher I Price; Peter McMeekin; Mehdi Javanbakht; Luke Vale; Gary A Ford; Lisa Shaw
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 5.266

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.