Literature DB >> 22417669

Anti-Müllerian hormone for the assessment of ovarian response in GnRH-antagonist-treated oocyte donors.

Nikolaos P Polyzos1, Dominic Stoop, Christophe Blockeel, Paul Adriaensen, Peter Platteau, Ellen Anckaert, Johan Smitz, Paul Devroey.   

Abstract

Evidence regarding the role of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) among oocyte donors is limited and only involves gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonist-treated donors. This trial assessed the predictive ability of AMH for ovarian response among 108 oocyte donors treated with an antagonist protocol. In multivariate linear regression analysis, both AMH and age were independently associated with ovarian response (unstandardized coefficients 0.904 and -0.378, respectively). In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, AMH performed better than age, but was a modest predictive marker for low (≤ 6 oocytes) and excessive (>20 oocytes) ovarian response (area under the curve (AUC) 0.643 and 0.695, respectively). Similarly, a multivariate logistic model including AMH and age was also modest (AUC 0.651 and 0.697 for low and excessive responders, respectively). The predictive ability of AMH did not significantly alter when different thresholds were adopted, such as <4 oocytes for low response and >25 for excessive response (AUC 0.759 and 0.724, respectively). Among oocyte donors treated with a GnRH-antagonist protocol, although AMH was correlated with the number of oocytes retrieved, it demonstrates a modest ability in discriminating women with low or excessive ovarian response. Selection of oocyte donors is of paramount importance for the proper and more cost-efficient functionality of the oocyte donation programme. Despite the extensive literature regarding the efficacy of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) for predicting ovarian response among infertile patients, available evidence regarding the role of AMH in oocyte donors is considerably limited and involves only agonist down-regulated cycles. In this trial we assessed whether AMH can be considered a predictive marker for ovarian response among oocyte donors treated with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-antagonist protocol. According to our results, among oocyte donors treated with a GnRH-antagonist protocol, although AMH was correlated with the number of oocytes retrieved, the correlation is not strong and it appears that AMH has a modest predictive ability to discriminate women who are likely to demonstrate either impaired or excessive response to ovarian stimulation.
Copyright © 2012 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22417669     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.01.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  3 in total

1.  Baseline AMH Level Associated With Ovulation Following Ovulation Induction in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Sunni L Mumford; Richard S Legro; Michael P Diamond; Christos Coutifaris; Anne Z Steiner; William D Schlaff; Ruben Alvero; Gregory M Christman; Peter R Casson; Hao Huang; Nanette Santoro; Esther Eisenberg; Heping Zhang; Marcelle I Cedars
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Anti-Müllerian hormone serum level and other markers associated with pregnancy outcome in oocyte donation.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Delesalle; Geoffroy Robin; Patricia Thomas-Desrousseaux; Didier Dewailly; Sophie Catteau-Jonard
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 5.211

3.  What is the value of anti-Müllerian hormone in predicting the response to ovarian stimulation with GnRH agonist and antagonist protocols?

Authors:  Jure Knez; Borut Kovačič; Maruška Medved; Veljko Vlaisavljević
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 5.211

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.