Literature DB >> 22417535

Proposed DSM-5 mixed features are associated with greater likelihood of remission in out-patients with major depressive disorder.

R H Perlis1, C Cusin1, M Fava1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Draft DSM-5 criteria for a mixed major depressive episode have been proposed, but their predictive validity has not yet been established. We hypothesized that such symptoms would be associated with poorer antidepressant treatment outcomes.
METHOD: We examined outcomes among individuals with major depressive disorder participating in the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study, an effectiveness study conducted at primary and specialty care centers in the USA. Mixed features were derived from the six self-report items of the mania subscale of the Psychiatric Diagnosis Screening Questionnaire. Primary analyses examined the association between the presence of at least two of these in the 6 months before study entry, and remission across up to four sequential treatment trials, as well as adverse outcomes.
RESULTS: Of the 2397 subjects with a major depressive episode of at least 6 months' duration, 449 (18.7%) reported at least two mixed symptoms. The presence of such symptoms was associated with a greater likelihood of remission across up to four sequential treatments, which persisted after adjustment for potential confounding clinical and demographic variables (adjusted hazard ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.28). Two individual items, expansive mood and cheerfulness, were strongly associated with a greater likelihood of remission.
CONCLUSIONS: Proposed DSM-5 mixed state features were associated with a greater rather than a lesser likelihood of remission. While unexpected, this result suggests the potential utility of further investigation of depressive mixed states in major depression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22417535     DOI: 10.1017/S0033291712000281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Med        ISSN: 0033-2917            Impact factor:   7.723


  4 in total

1.  An organization- and category-level comparison of diagnostic requirements for mental disorders in ICD-11 and DSM-5.

Authors:  Michael B First; Wolfgang Gaebel; Mario Maj; Dan J Stein; Cary S Kogan; John B Saunders; Vladimir B Poznyak; Oye Gureje; Roberto Lewis-Fernández; Andreas Maercker; Chris R Brewin; Marylene Cloitre; Angelica Claudino; Kathleen M Pike; Gillian Baird; David Skuse; Richard B Krueger; Peer Briken; Jeffrey D Burke; John E Lochman; Spencer C Evans; Douglas W Woods; Geoffrey M Reed
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 49.548

2.  DSM-5 reviewed from different angles: goal attainment, rationality, use of evidence, consequences--part 1: general aspects and paradigmatic discussion of depressive disorders.

Authors:  Hans-Jürgen Möller; Borwin Bandelow; Michael Bauer; Harald Hampel; Sabine C Herpertz; Michael Soyka; Utako B Barnikol; Simone Lista; Emanuel Severus; Wolfgang Maier
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.270

3.  Mental, behavioral and neurodevelopmental disorders in the ICD-11: an international perspective on key changes and controversies.

Authors:  Dan J Stein; Peter Szatmari; Wolfgang Gaebel; Michael Berk; Eduard Vieta; Mario Maj; Ymkje Anna de Vries; Annelieke M Roest; Peter de Jonge; Andreas Maercker; Chris R Brewin; Kathleen M Pike; Carlos M Grilo; Naomi A Fineberg; Peer Briken; Peggy T Cohen-Kettenis; Geoffrey M Reed
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 4.  The State of the Art of the DSM-5 "with Mixed Features" Specifier.

Authors:  Norma Verdolini; Mark Agius; Laura Ferranti; Patrizia Moretti; Massimiliano Piselli; Roberto Quartesan
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-08-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.