AIMS: To discuss ethical issues that may arise in using WWA to monitor illicit drug use in the general population and in entertainment precincts, prisons, schools and work-places. METHOD: Review current applications of WWA and identify ethical and social issues that may be raised with current and projected future uses of this method. RESULTS: Wastewater analysis (WWA) of drug residues is a promising method of monitoring illicit drug use that may overcome some limitations of other monitoring methods. When used for monitoring purposes in large populations, WWA does not raise major ethical concerns because individuals are not identified and the prospects of harming residents of catchment areas are remote. When WWA is used in smaller catchment areas (entertainment venues, prisons, schools or work-places) their results could, possibly, indirectly affect the occupants adversely. Researchers will need to take care in reporting their results to reduce media misreporting. Fears about possible use of WWA for mass individual surveillance by drug law enforcement officials are unlikely to be realized, but will need to be addressed because they may affect public support adversely for this type of research. CONCLUSIONS: Using wastewater analysis to monitor illicit drug use in large populations does not raise major ethical concerns, but researchers need to minimize possible adverse consequences in studying smaller populations, such as workers, prisoners and students.
AIMS: To discuss ethical issues that may arise in using WWA to monitor illicit drug use in the general population and in entertainment precincts, prisons, schools and work-places. METHOD: Review current applications of WWA and identify ethical and social issues that may be raised with current and projected future uses of this method. RESULTS: Wastewater analysis (WWA) of drug residues is a promising method of monitoring illicit drug use that may overcome some limitations of other monitoring methods. When used for monitoring purposes in large populations, WWA does not raise major ethical concerns because individuals are not identified and the prospects of harming residents of catchment areas are remote. When WWA is used in smaller catchment areas (entertainment venues, prisons, schools or work-places) their results could, possibly, indirectly affect the occupants adversely. Researchers will need to take care in reporting their results to reduce media misreporting. Fears about possible use of WWA for mass individual surveillance by drug law enforcement officials are unlikely to be realized, but will need to be addressed because they may affect public support adversely for this type of research. CONCLUSIONS: Using wastewater analysis to monitor illicit drug use in large populations does not raise major ethical concerns, but researchers need to minimize possible adverse consequences in studying smaller populations, such as workers, prisoners and students.
Authors: Peng Du; Xin Liu; Guangcai Zhong; Zilei Zhou; Margaret William Thomes; Choon Weng Lee; Chui Wei Bong; Xuan Zhang; Fanghua Hao; Xiqing Li; Gan Zhang; Phong K Thai Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Phil M Choi; Benjamin Tscharke; Saer Samanipour; Wayne D Hall; Coral E Gartner; Jochen F Mueller; Kevin V Thomas; Jake W O'Brien Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-10-07 Impact factor: 11.205