Literature DB >> 22417134

Response to Mayers and Redick: "clinical utility of ImPACT assessment for postconcussion return-to-play counseling: psychometric issues".

Philip Schatz1, Anthony Kontos, Rj Elbin.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2012        PMID： 22417134     DOI： 10.1080/13803395.2012.667789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol        ISSN： 1380-3395            Impact factor:   2.475


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

Review 1.  Reliability of Computerized Neurocognitive Tests for Concussion Assessment: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  James L Farnsworth; Lucas Dargo; Brian G Ragan; Minsoo Kang
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Two-year Test-Retest Reliability of ImPACT in High School Athletes.

Authors:  William T Tsushima; Andrea M Siu; Annina M Pearce; Guangxiang Zhang; Ross S Oshiro
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2015-11-15       Impact factor: 2.813

3.  Comparing post-concussive neurocognitive test data to normative data presents risks for under-classifying "above average" athletes.

Authors:  Philip Schatz; Stacey Robertshaw
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.813

4.  Prevalence of Invalid Performance on Baseline Testing for Sport-Related Concussion by Age and Validity Indicator.

Authors:  Christopher A Abeare; Isabelle Messa; Brandon G Zuccato; Bradley Merker; Laszlo Erdodi
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 18.302
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.