Literature DB >> 22416717

Defining the public health threat of food fraud.

John Spink1, Douglas C Moyer.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Food fraud, including the more defined subcategory of economically motivated adulteration, is a food risk that is gaining recognition and concern. Regardless of the cause of the food risk, adulteration of food is both an industry and a government responsibility. Food safety, food fraud, and food defense incidents can create adulteration of food with public health threats. Food fraud is an intentional act for economic gain, whereas a food safety incident is an unintentional act with unintentional harm, and a food defense incident is an intentional act with intentional harm. Economically motivated adulteration may be just that-economically motivated-but the food-related public health risks are often more risky than traditional food safety threats because the contaminants are unconventional. Current intervention systems are not designed to look for a near infinite number of potential contaminants. The authors developed the core concepts reported here following comprehensive research of articles and reports, expert elicitation, and an extensive peer review. The intent of this research paper is to provide a base reference document for defining food fraud-it focuses specifically on the public health threat-and to facilitate a shift in focus from intervention to prevention. This will subsequently provide a framework for future quantitative or innovative research. The fraud opportunity is deconstructed using the criminology and behavioral science applications of the crime triangle and the chemistry of the crime. The research provides a food risk matrix and identifies food fraud incident types. This project provides a starting point for future food science, food safety, and food defense research. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: Food fraud, including the more defined subcategory of economically motivated adulteration, is a food protection threat that has not been defined or holistically addressed. The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, led to the development of food defense as an autonomous area of study and a new food protection discipline. As economically motivated adulteration grows in scope, scale, and awareness, it is conceivable that food fraud will achieve the same status as an autonomous concept, between food safety and food defense. This research establishes a starting point for defining food fraud and identifying the public health risks.
© 2011 Institute of Food Technologists®

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22416717     DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02417.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Sci        ISSN: 0022-1147            Impact factor:   3.167


  35 in total

1.  Occurrence of mislabeling in meat products using DNA-based assay.

Authors:  Angela Di Pinto; Marilisa Bottaro; Elisabetta Bonerba; Giancarlo Bozzo; Edmondo Ceci; Patrizia Marchetti; Anna Mottola; Giuseppina Tantillo
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  On the potential of using peculiarities of the protein intrinsic disorder distribution in mitochondrial cytochrome b to identify the source of animal meats.

Authors:  Haitham A Yacoub; Mahmoud A Sadek; Vladimir N Uversky
Journal:  Intrinsically Disord Proteins       Date:  2017-03-07

Review 3.  Integrated analytical assets aid botanical authenticity and adulteration management.

Authors:  Charlotte Simmler; James G Graham; Shao-Nong Chen; Guido F Pauli
Journal:  Fitoterapia       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 4.  Anatomy and resilience of the global production ecosystem.

Authors:  M Nyström; J-B Jouffray; A V Norström; B Crona; P Søgaard Jørgensen; S R Carpenter; Ö Bodin; V Galaz; C Folke
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  X-ray driven peanut trait estimation: computer vision aided agri-system transformation.

Authors:  Martha Domhoefer; Debarati Chakraborty; Eva Hufnagel; Joelle Claußen; Norbert Wörlein; Marijn Voorhaar; Krithika Anbazhagan; Sunita Choudhary; Janila Pasupuleti; Rekha Baddam; Jana Kholova; Stefan Gerth
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 5.827

6.  Methods in food defence: a simple and robust screening for 16 rodenticides by LC-DAD/FLD following QuEChERS-based extraction.

Authors:  Georg Menacher; Benedikt Masberg; Paul W Elsinghorst
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.478

7.  Unscrambling the Provenance of Eggs by Combining Chemometrics and Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Louwrens Christiaan Hoffman; Dongdong Ni; Buddhi Dayananda; N Abdul Ghafar; Daniel Cozzolino
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 8.  Proteomics as a promising biomarker in food authentication, quality and safety: A review.

Authors:  Muhammad Afzaal; Farhan Saeed; Muzzamal Hussain; Farheen Shahid; Azhari Siddeeg; Ammar Al-Farga
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.553

9.  Consumer Knowledge about Food Labeling and Fraud.

Authors:  Maria João Moreira; Juan García-Díez; José M M M de Almeida; Cristina Saraiva
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-05-15

10.  Organised food crime: an analysis of the involvements of organised crime groups in the food sector in England and Italy.

Authors:  Alice Rizzuti
Journal:  Crime Law Soc Change       Date:  2021-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.