T P Jürgens1, A Schulte, T Klein, A May. 1. Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. t.juergens@uke.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to effectively modulate cortical excitability. Several studies have suggested clinical efficacy in pain syndromes such as central neuropathic pain or fibromyalgia. However, little is known regarding tDCS effects on nociception in healthy volunteers. METHODS: In the present study, we examined the effects of anodal, cathodal and sham stimulation of the left primary motor cortex in 17 healthy volunteers on modalities of a comprehensive quantitative sensory testing protocol (including thermal and mechanoreceptive detection and pain thresholds) and on a repetitive heat pain paradigm mimicking clinical pain. The study was conducted in a single-blind crossover fashion. tDCS was applied at 1 mA for 15 min. RESULTS: We could not detect any relevant modulation of somatosensory and pain variables in quantitative sensory testing. In addition, no significant alteration of enhanced pain ratings to repetitive noxious heat stimuli (heat hyperalgesia) was found. CONCLUSION: As pain processing in chronic pain patients might differ, tDCS could exert its antinociceptive effects depending on the activation level of the nociceptive system.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to effectively modulate cortical excitability. Several studies have suggested clinical efficacy in pain syndromes such as central neuropathic pain or fibromyalgia. However, little is known regarding tDCS effects on nociception in healthy volunteers. METHODS: In the present study, we examined the effects of anodal, cathodal and sham stimulation of the left primary motor cortex in 17 healthy volunteers on modalities of a comprehensive quantitative sensory testing protocol (including thermal and mechanoreceptive detection and pain thresholds) and on a repetitive heat pain paradigm mimicking clinical pain. The study was conducted in a single-blind crossover fashion. tDCS was applied at 1 mA for 15 min. RESULTS: We could not detect any relevant modulation of somatosensory and pain variables in quantitative sensory testing. In addition, no significant alteration of enhanced pain ratings to repetitive noxious heat stimuli (heat hyperalgesia) was found. CONCLUSION: As pain processing in chronic painpatients might differ, tDCS could exert its antinociceptive effects depending on the activation level of the nociceptive system.
Authors: Stefano Giannoni-Luza; Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas; Piero F Mejia-Pando; Maria A Luna-Cuadros; Judah L Barouh; Marina Gnoatto-Medeiros; Ludmilla Candido-Santos; Alice Barra; Wolnei Caumo; Felipe Fregni Journal: Pain Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 7.926
Authors: Nádia Regina Jardim da Silva; Gabriela Laste; Alícia Deitos; Luciana Cadore Stefani; Gustavo Cambraia-Canto; Iraci L S Torres; Andre R Brunoni; Felipe Fregni; Wolnei Caumo Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 3.558
Authors: Marcos F DosSantos; Ilkka K Martikainen; Thiago D Nascimento; Tiffany M Love; Misty D DeBoer; Heidi M Schambra; Marom Bikson; Jon-Kar Zubieta; Alexandre F DaSilva Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-16 Impact factor: 3.240