Literature DB >> 22416008

Estimation of the frequency of involuntary infertility on a nation-wide basis.

R Slama1, O K H Hansen, B Ducot, A Bohet, D Sorensen, L Giorgis Allemand, M J C Eijkemans, L Rosetta, J C Thalabard, N Keiding, J Bouyer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assessing couple fecundity on a nation-wide basis without excluding couples who eventually remain infertile is challenging. Our aim was to describe couple fecundity (in terms of frequency of involuntary infertility) among the general population living in France.
METHODS: We used a current-duration design. A random sample of 64 262 households was selected in 2007-2008, allowing us to identify 15 810 women aged 18-44 years. Eligible women (n= 1089) were those having regular sexual intercourse with a male partner, not using any method of contraception and not having delivered in the previous 3 months. These women reported information on the current duration of unprotected intercourse (CDUI, the time elapsed between the start of the period of unprotected intercourse and the time of inclusion in the study). The CDUI distribution was used to estimate the frequency of involuntary infertility, using a newly developed statistical technique that does not require couples to be followed up until the end of the period of unprotected intercourse.
RESULTS: CDUI was defined for 867 women. An estimated 46% of couples had no detected pregnancy conceived during the first 6 months of unprotected intercourse [95% confidence interval (CI), 36-56%]. The proportions of couples with no detected pregnancy within 12 and 24 months were 24% (19-30%) and 11% (8-14%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: These results constitute one of the few descriptions of the fecundity of a nation-wide representative sample of couples from the general population, not limited to couples who eventually conceived or to those resorting to medical help.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22416008     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  34 in total

1.  Estimates of unintended pregnancy rates over the last decade in France as a function of contraceptive behaviors.

Authors:  Caroline Moreau; Aline Bohet; James Trussell; Nathalie Bajos
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  The current duration design for estimating the time to pregnancy distribution: a nonparametric Bayesian perspective.

Authors:  Dario Gasbarra; Elja Arjas; Aki Vehtari; Rémy Slama; Niels Keiding
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Prevalent cohort studies and unobserved heterogeneity.

Authors:  Niels Keiding; Katrine Lykke Albertsen; Helene Charlotte Rytgaard; Anne Lyngholm Sørensen
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 4.  The use of in vitro fertilization in the management of male infertility: what the urologist needs to know.

Authors:  Sahar M Stephens; Daniel M Arnett; Randall B Meacham
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2013

Review 5.  Diet and fertility: a review.

Authors:  Audrey J Gaskins; Jorge E Chavarro
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Prevalence of infertility in the United States as estimated by the current duration approach and a traditional constructed approach.

Authors:  Marie E Thoma; Alexander C McLain; Jean Fredo Louis; Rosalind B King; Ann C Trumble; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations and treatment outcomes of women undergoing assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Laura Abadia; Audrey J Gaskins; Yu-Han Chiu; Paige L Williams; Myra Keller; Diane L Wright; Irene Souter; Russ Hauser; Jorge E Chavarro
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  The association between pre-treatment maternal alcohol and caffeine intake and outcomes of assisted reproduction in a prospectively followed cohort.

Authors:  L Abadia; Y-H Chiu; P L Williams; T L Toth; I Souter; R Hauser; J E Chavarro; A J Gaskins
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 9.  Epidemiologic tools to study the influence of environmental factors on fecundity and pregnancy-related outcomes.

Authors:  Rémy Slama; Ferran Ballester; Maribel Casas; Sylvaine Cordier; Merete Eggesbø; Carmen Iniguez; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Claire Philippat; Sylvie Rey; Stéphanie Vandentorren; Martine Vrijheid
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 6.222

10.  Male alcohol consumption and fecundability.

Authors:  S Høyer; A H Riis; G Toft; L A Wise; E E Hatch; A K Wesselink; K J Rothman; H T Sørensen; E M Mikkelsen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.