BACKGROUND: This phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of sorafenib combined with vorinostat in patients with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with sorafenib 400 mg po bid daily and vorinostat 200-400 mg po days 1-14 of a 21 day cycle to establish the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). The tolerability and efficacy of the RP2D was further tested in two cohorts of 6-12 patients each with advanced RCC and NSCLC. RESULTS: 17 patients were treated in the dose escalation phase that established the RP2D at sorafenib 400 mg po bid daily, vorinostat 300 mg po days 1-14. Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) included intolerable grade 2 hand-foot syndrome and multiple grade 1 toxicities causing dose interruption for more than 14 days. Despite good tolerance in the all-comers population, the RP2D was poorly tolerated in the RCC and NSCLC cohorts with the majority being unable to finish 2 full cycles of therapy. Although there were no confirmed responses, 1 patient each with NSCLC adenocarcinoma and renal sarcoma had unconfirmed partial responses and 5 of 8 patients with RCC having durable minor responses (11-26 %), including 2 who were on treatment for nearly a year. CONCLUSIONS: Although tolerable in other tumor types, sorafenib 400 mg po bid with vorinostat 300 mg po daily days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle is not tolerable without dose reductions/delays in RCC and NSCLC patients. These patients may require lower doses than the RP2D explored within this study. No confirmed responses were seen but minor responses particularly in RCC were observed.
BACKGROUND: This phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of sorafenib combined with vorinostat in patients with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with sorafenib 400 mg po bid daily and vorinostat 200-400 mg po days 1-14 of a 21 day cycle to establish the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). The tolerability and efficacy of the RP2D was further tested in two cohorts of 6-12 patients each with advanced RCC and NSCLC. RESULTS: 17 patients were treated in the dose escalation phase that established the RP2D at sorafenib 400 mg po bid daily, vorinostat 300 mg po days 1-14. Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) included intolerable grade 2 hand-foot syndrome and multiple grade 1 toxicities causing dose interruption for more than 14 days. Despite good tolerance in the all-comers population, the RP2D was poorly tolerated in the RCC and NSCLC cohorts with the majority being unable to finish 2 full cycles of therapy. Although there were no confirmed responses, 1 patient each with NSCLC adenocarcinoma and renal sarcoma had unconfirmed partial responses and 5 of 8 patients with RCC having durable minor responses (11-26 %), including 2 who were on treatment for nearly a year. CONCLUSIONS: Although tolerable in other tumor types, sorafenib 400 mg po bid with vorinostat 300 mg po daily days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle is not tolerable without dose reductions/delays in RCC and NSCLCpatients. These patients may require lower doses than the RP2D explored within this study. No confirmed responses were seen but minor responses particularly in RCC were observed.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Cesare Gridelli; Paolo Maione; Filomena Del Gaizo; Giuseppe Colantuoni; Ciro Guerriero; Carmine Ferrara; Dario Nicolella; Daniela Comunale; Alba De Vita; Antonio Rossi Journal: Oncologist Date: 2007-02
Authors: Elise A Olsen; Youn H Kim; Timothy M Kuzel; Theresa R Pacheco; Francine M Foss; Sareeta Parker; Stanley R Frankel; Cong Chen; Justin L Ricker; Jean Marie Arduino; Madeleine Duvic Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-06-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David Siegel; Mohamad Hussein; Chandra Belani; Francisco Robert; Evanthia Galanis; Victoria M Richon; José Garcia-Vargas; Cesar Sanz-Rodriguez; Syed Rizvi Journal: J Hematol Oncol Date: 2009-07-27 Impact factor: 17.388
Authors: Guo Zhang; Margaret A Park; Clint Mitchell; Hossein Hamed; Mohamed Rahmani; Aditi Pandya Martin; David T Curiel; Adly Yacoub; Martin Graf; Ray Lee; John D Roberts; Paul B Fisher; Steven Grant; Paul Dent Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-09-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: George R Blumenschein; Ulrich Gatzemeier; Frank Fossella; David J Stewart; Lisa Cupit; Frank Cihon; James O'Leary; Martin Reck Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-08-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Maria Rusan; Kapsok Li; Yvonne Li; Camilla L Christensen; Brian J Abraham; Nicholas Kwiatkowski; Kevin A Buczkowski; Bruno Bockorny; Ting Chen; Shuai Li; Kevin Rhee; Haikuo Zhang; Wankun Chen; Hideki Terai; Tiffany Tavares; Alan L Leggett; Tianxia Li; Yichen Wang; Tinghu Zhang; Tae-Jung Kim; Sook-Hee Hong; Neermala Poudel-Neupane; Michael Silkes; Tenny Mudianto; Li Tan; Takeshi Shimamura; Matthew Meyerson; Adam J Bass; Hideo Watanabe; Nathanael S Gray; Richard A Young; Kwok-Kin Wong; Peter S Hammerman Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2017-10-20 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Javier C Angulo; Claudia Manini; Jose I López; Angel Pueyo; Begoña Colás; Santiago Ropero Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-04-25 Impact factor: 6.639