Literature DB >> 22415202

Forces, movements and reflexes produced by pushing human teeth.

Brendan J J Scott1, Andrew G Mason, Samuel W Cadden.   

Abstract

Pushing a tooth results in movement of the tooth and reflex inhibition of activity in jaw-closing muscles. The aims of this study were to determine how much tooth movement is required to elicit such reflexes and whether this is dependent on the point of force application to the tooth. Eight experiments were performed on six volunteer subjects. Electromyograms (EMGs) were recorded from a masseter muscle while the subjects produced approximately 12.5 % of the EMG associated with maximal clenching. Reflexes were evoked by pushing at two positions (incisal and cervical) on an upper central incisor. The forces applied and the resulting movements of the tooth were recorded. There was a linear relationship between force and movement regardless of whether the force was incisal or cervical (Pearson's r = 0.91 and r = 0.93 respectively). There were no differences between the slopes or intercepts for these relationships (ANCOVA p = 0.42, p = 0.46 respectively). There were linear relationships between the logarithms of force or movement and the resulting inhibitory reflexes (r = 0.81, 0.79, 0.81 and 0.74 for incisal and cervical forces and incisal and cervical movements, respectively). Again, there were no significant differences between the slopes for these relationships (ANCOVA p = 0.75, p = 0.46 for force and movement, respectively). There were no significant differences between the reflex thresholds for incisal and cervical stimuli in terms of force (0.23 and 0.25 N, ANCOVA p = 0.1) or movement (9.7 and 8.5 μm, ANCOVA p = 0.22). Thus, it appears that neither tooth movements nor jaw reflexes are dependent on the point of force application to a tooth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22415202     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3056-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  18 in total

1.  Conditions for excitatory or inhibitory masseteric reflexes elicited by tooth pressure in man.

Authors:  K S Türker; J Yang; P Brodin
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.633

2.  Remote noxious stimuli modulate jaw reflexes evoked by activation of periodontal ligament mechanoreceptors in man.

Authors:  Andrew G Mason; Brendan J J Scott; Hilbert W van der Glas; Roger W A Linden; Samuel W Cadden
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.969

Review 3.  Topical review: modulation of trigeminal sensory input in humans: mechanisms and clinical implications.

Authors:  Frank Lobbezoo; Mats Trulsson; Reinhilde Jacobs; Peter Svensson; Samuel W Cadden; Daniel van Steenberghe
Journal:  J Orofac Pain       Date:  2002

4.  Distribution of mesencephalic nucleus and trigeminal ganglion mechanoreceptors in the periodontal ligament of the cat.

Authors:  R W Linden; B J Scott
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Effects of controlled tooth stimulation of jaw muscle activity in man.

Authors:  B J Sessle; A Schmitt
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.633

6.  Electronic registration of tooth movements.

Authors:  K H Körber
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  1971-12-04       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Periodontal pulsation.

Authors:  K H Körber
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 6.993

8.  Changes in the activity of the masseter muscle following tooth contact in man.

Authors:  A G Hannam; B Matthews; R Yemm
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 2.633

9.  Oral pressure receptors mediate a series of inhibitory and excitatory periods in the masseteric poststimulus EMG complex following tapping of a tooth in man.

Authors:  H W van der Glas; A de Laat; D van Steenberghe
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1985-06-24       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  The distribution of mechanoreceptors in the periodontal ligament of the mandibular canine tooth of the cat.

Authors:  R M Cash; R W Linden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.