Literature DB >> 22415019

Influence of body parameters on gastric bioelectric and biomagnetic fields in a realistic volume conductor.

J H K Kim1, A J Pullan, L A Bradshaw, L K Cheng.   

Abstract

Electrogastrograms (EGG) and magnetogastrograms (MGG) provide two complementary methods for non-invasively recording electric or magnetic fields resulting from gastric electrical slow wave activity. It is known that EGG signals are relatively weak and difficult to reliably record while magnetic fields are, in theory, less attenuated by the low-conductivity fat layers present in the body. In this paper, we quantified the effects of fat thickness and conductivity values on resultant magnetic and electric fields using anatomically realistic torso models and trains of dipole sources reflecting recent experimental results. The results showed that when the fat conductivity was increased, there was minimal change in both potential and magnetic fields. However, when the fat conductivity was reduced, the magnetic fields were largely unchanged, but electric potentials had a significant change in patterns and amplitudes. When the thickness of the fat layer was increased by 30 mm, the amplitude of the magnetic fields decreased 10% more than potentials but magnetic field patterns were changed about four times less than potentials. The ability to localize the underlying sources from the magnetic fields using a surface current density measure was altered by less than 2 mm when the fat layer was increased by 30 mm. In summary, results confirm that MGG provides a favorable method over EGG when there are uncertain levels of fat thickness or conductivity.
© 2012 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22415019      PMCID: PMC3359963          DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/33/4/545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  23 in total

1.  The human vector magnetogastrogram and magnetoenterogram.

Authors:  L A Bradshaw; J K Ladipo; D J Staton; J P Wikswo; W O Richards
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Pitfalls in the analysis of electrogastrographic recordings.

Authors:  M A Verhagen; L J Van Schelven; M Samsom; A J Smout
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Volume conductor effects on the spatial resolution of magnetic fields and electric potentials from gastrointestinal electrical activity.

Authors:  L A Bradshaw; W O Richards; J P Wikswo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Biomagnetic detection of gastric electrical activity in normal and vagotomized rabbits.

Authors:  L A Bradshaw; A G Myers; A Redmond; J P Wikswo; W O Richards
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Noninvasive assessment of the effects of glucagon on the gastric slow wave.

Authors:  L Alan Bradshaw; Jared A Sims; William O Richards
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 4.052

6.  Gastric myoelectrical activity and gastric emptying in patients with functional dyspepsia.

Authors:  Z Lin; E Y Eaker; I Sarosiek; R W McCallum
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  An anatomical model of the gastric system for producing bioelectric and biomagnetic fields.

Authors:  M L Buist; L K Cheng; R Yassi; L A Bradshaw; W O Richards; A J Pullan
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.833

8.  Origin and propagation of the slow wave in the canine stomach: the outlines of a gastric conduction system.

Authors:  Wim J E P Lammers; Luc Ver Donck; Betty Stephen; Dirk Smets; Jan A J Schuurkes
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 9.  Interstitial cells of Cajal in health and disease.

Authors:  G Farrugia
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.598

10.  Biomagnetic signatures of uncoupled gastric musculature.

Authors:  L A Bradshaw; A Irimia; J A Sims; W O Richards
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 3.598

View more
  7 in total

1.  Noninvasive Magnetogastrography Detects Erythromycin-Induced Effects on the Gastric Slow Wave.

Authors:  Suseela Somarajan; Nicole D Muszynski; Dilovan Hawrami; Joseph D Olson; Leo K Cheng; Leonard A Bradshaw
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Effects of body mass index on gastric slow wave: a magnetogastrographic study.

Authors:  S Somarajan; S Cassilly; C Obioha; W O Richards; L A Bradshaw
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 2.833

Review 3.  Toward the virtual stomach: progress in multiscale modeling of gastric electrophysiology and motility.

Authors:  Peng Du; Gregory O'Grady; Jerry Gao; Shameer Sathar; Leo K Cheng
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2013-03-05

4.  Diabetic gastroparesis alters the biomagnetic signature of the gastric slow wave.

Authors:  L A Bradshaw; L K Cheng; E Chung; C B Obioha; J C Erickson; B L Gorman; S Somarajan; W O Richards
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Reconstruction of normal and abnormal gastric electrical sources using a potential based inverse method.

Authors:  J H K Kim; P Du; L K Cheng
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.833

6.  Effect of Body Mass Index on the sensitivity of Magnetogastrogram and Electrogastrogram.

Authors:  Chibuike Obioha; Jon Erickson; Somarajan Suseela; Tahar Hajri; Eric Chung; William Richards; L Alan Bradshaw
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol Res       Date:  2013-04-21

7.  Effects of magnetogastrography sensor configurations in tracking slow wave propagation.

Authors:  Chad E Eichler; Leo K Cheng; Niranchan Paskaranandavadivel; Peng Du; Leonard A Bradshaw; Recep Avci
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 4.589

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.