Literature DB >> 22414834

A comparison of the cytotoxicity and proinflammatory cytokine production of EndoSequence root repair material and ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate in human osteoblast cell culture using reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.

Maria Ciasca1, Anita Aminoshariae, Ge Jin, Thomas Montagnese, Andre Mickel.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the cytotoxicity and cytokine expression profiles of EndoSequence Root Repair Material (ERRM; Brasseler, Savannah, GA) putty, ERRM flowable, and ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA; Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Johnson City, TN) using osteoblast cells (MG-63).
METHODS: Four millimeters in diameter of each material was placed in the center of a 6-well culture plate, and a 2-mL suspension (10(5) cells/mL) of human osteoblasts was seeded in each well. Photomicrograph images were used to evaluate cytotoxicity as evidenced by the lack of osteoblast cell growth in relation to the materials with AH-26 (Dentsply Tulsa Dental) as the positive control. In addition, reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to evaluate the expression of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). Cytokine expression of MG-63 cells upon lipopolysaccharide treatment was used as controls. RT-PCR results were normalized by the expression of the housekeeping gene β-actin and were used to measure cytokine expression. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance.
RESULTS: Results showed that ERRM putty and MTA exhibited minimal levels of cytotoxicity; however, ERRM was slightly more cytotoxic although not statistically significant. The expression of IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8 was detected in all samples with minimal TNF-α expression.
CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that ERRM and MTA showed similar cytotoxicity and cytokine expressions. Copyright Â
© 2012 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22414834     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  8 in total

1.  [Evaluation of bioceramic putty repairment in primary molars pulpotomy].

Authors:  Y Lei; Y T Yang; Y Zhan
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-02-18

2.  Healing after root-end microsurgery by using mineral trioxide aggregate and a new calcium silicate-based bioceramic material as root-end filling materials in dogs.

Authors:  Ian Chen; Bekir Karabucak; Cong Wang; Han-Guo Wang; Eiki Koyama; Meetu R Kohli; Hyun-Duck Nah; Syngcuk Kim
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 3.  In vitro biocompatibility and bioactivity of calcium silicate‑based bioceramics in endodontics (Review).

Authors:  Wencheng Song; Shue Li; Qingming Tang; Lili Chen; Zhenglin Yuan
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.101

4.  In vitro cytotoxicity of four calcium silicate-based endodontic cements on human monocytes, a colorimetric MTT assay.

Authors:  Sedigheh Khedmat; Somayyeh Dehghan; Jamshid Hadjati; Farimah Masoumi; Mohammad Hossein Nekoofar; Paul Michael Howell Dummer
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2014-04-30

5.  Cytotoxicity of two available mineral trioxide aggregate cements and a new formulation on human gingival fibroblasts.

Authors:  Maryam Torshabi; Reza Amid; Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh; Sara Eslami Shahrbabaki; Fahimeh S Tabatabaei
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

Review 6.  Comparison of the biocompatibility of calcium silicate-based materials to mineral trioxide aggregate: Systematic review.

Authors:  Natália Gomes de Oliveira; Pollyana Rodrigues de Souza Araújo; Marina Torreão da Silveira; Ana Paula Veras Sobral; Marianne de Vasconcelos Carvalho
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

7.  Comparison of in vitro biocompatibility and antibacterial activity of two calcium silicate-based materials.

Authors:  Mingxiang Liu; Lu He; Hongyuan Wang; Wenpei Su; Hong Li
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  A comparative study on root canal repair materials: a cytocompatibility assessment in L929 and MG63 cells.

Authors:  Yuqing Jiang; Qinghua Zheng; Xuedong Zhou; Yuan Gao; Dingming Huang
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-01-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.