Literature DB >> 22414822

A prospective randomized trial of different supplementary local anesthetic techniques after failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular teeth.

Mohammad D Kanaa1, John M Whitworth, John Gerard Meechan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of supplementary repeat inferior alveolar nerve block with 2% lidocaine and epinephrine, buccal infiltration with 4% articaine with epinephrine, intraligamentary injection, or intraosseous injection (both with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine) after failed inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) for securing pain-free treatment in patients experiencing irreversible pulpitis in mandibular permanent teeth.
METHODS: This randomized clinical trial included 182 patients diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular teeth. Patients received 2.0 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine as an IANB injection. Patients who did not experience pain-free treatment received randomly 1 of 4 supplementary techniques, namely repeat lidocaine IANB (rIANB), articaine buccal infiltration (ABI), lidocaine intraligamentary injection (PDL), or lidocaine intraosseous injection (IO). Successful pulp anesthesia was considered to have occurred when no response was obtained to the maximum stimulation (80 reading) of the pulp tester, at which time treatment commenced. Treatment was regarded as being successfully completed when it was associated with no pain. Data were analyzed by χ(2) and Fisher exact tests.
RESULTS: Of the 182 patients, 122 achieved successful pulpal anesthesia within 10 minutes after initial IANB injection; 82 experienced pain-free treatment. ABI and IO allowed more successful (pain-free) treatment (84% and 68%, respectively) than rIANB or PDL supplementary techniques (32% and 48%, respectively); this was statistically significant (P = .001).
CONCLUSIONS: IANB injection alone does not always allow pain-free treatment for mandibular teeth with irreversible pulpitis. Supplementary buccal infiltration with 4% articaine with epinephrine and intraosseous injection with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine are more likely to allow pain-free treatment than intraligamentary and repeat IANB injections with 2% lidocaine with epinephrine for patients experiencing irreversible pulpitis in mandibular permanent teeth. Crown Copyright Â
© 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22414822     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  34 in total

Review 1.  Effective anaesthesia of the acutely inflamed pulp: part 2. Clinical strategies.

Authors:  S S Virdee; S Bhakta; D Seymour
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Anesthetic efficacy of meperidine in teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.

Authors:  Ladan Mohajeri; Farnaz Salehi; Payman Mehrvarzfar; Hamide Arfaee; Behnam Bohluli; Reza Hamedy
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2015

3.  Anesthetic efficacy of mental/incisive nerve block compared to inferior alveolar nerve block using 4% articaine in mandibular premolars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Sholeh Ghabraei; Ashraf Shubbar; Mohammad H Nekoofar; Ali Nosrat
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Case-control study of mandibular canal branching and tooth-related inflammatory lesions.

Authors:  Mauricio Augusto Aquino Castro; Manuel Oscar Lagravere Vich; Mauro Henrique Guimaraes Abreu; Ricardo Alves Mesquita
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 5.  Articaine buccal infiltration vs lidocaine inferior dental block - a review of the literature.

Authors:  G Bartlett; J Mansoor
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Extraction of mandibular premolars and molars: comparison between local infiltration via pressure syringe and inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia.

Authors:  Daniel G E Thiem; Florian Schnaith; Caroline M E Van Aken; Anne Köntges; Vinay V Kumar; Bilal Al-Nawas; Peer W Kämmerer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Pulpal anesthesia in pediatric patients following supplemental mandibular buccal infiltration in vital permanent mandibular molars with deep caries.

Authors:  Papimon Chompu-Inwai; Puangporn Bua-On; Areerat Nirunsittirat; Patchanee Chuveera; Phumisak Louwakul; Thanapat Sastraruji
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Evaluation of different mandibular blocks for the removal of lower third molars: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  Carolina-Noemi Cavallini; Jorge Toledano-Serrabona; Cosme Gay-Escoda
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Postoperative endodontic pain of three different instrumentation techniques in asymptomatic necrotic mandibular molars with periapical lesion: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

Authors:  Ali Shokraneh; Majid Ajami; Nastaran Farhadi; Mohsen Hosseini; Bita Rohani
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Anaesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine in Comparison with 2% Lidocaine as Intraligamentary Injections after an Ineffective Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Mandibular Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective Randomised Triple-Blind Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Nazanin Zargar; Elnaz Shooshtari; Leila Pourmusavi; Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban; Hengameh Ashraf; Ardavan Parhizkar
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.