Literature DB >> 22412874

Comparative skull morphology of uropeltid snakes (Alethinophidia: Uropeltidae) with special reference to disarticulated elements and variation.

Jennifer C Olori1, Christopher J Bell.   

Abstract

Uropeltids form a diverse clade of highly derived, fossorial snakes that, because of their phylogenetic position among other alethinophidian lineages, may play a key role in understanding the early evolution of cranial morphology in snakes. We include detailed osteological descriptions of crania and mandibles for eight uropeltid species from three nominal genera (Uropeltis, Rhinophis, and Brachyophidium) and emphasize disarticulated elements and the impact of intraspecific variation on previously proposed morphological characters used for phylogenetic analysis. Preliminary analysis of phylogenetic relationships strongly supports a clade composed exclusively of species of Plectrurus, Uropeltis, and Rhinophis. However, monophyly of each of those genera and Melanophidium is not upheld. There is moderate support that Sri Lankan species (e.g., Rhinophis and Uropeltis melanogaster) are monophyletic with respect to Indian uropeltids. Previously proposed characters that are phylogenetically informative include the shape of the nasals, length of the occipital condyle, level of development of the posteroventral process of the dentary, and participation of the parietal in the optic foramen. Additionally, thirty new features that may be systematically informative are identified and described, but were not verified for their utility. Such verification must await availability of additional disarticulated cranial material from a larger sample of taxa. All characters require further testing through increased focus on sources and patterns of intraspecific variation, inclusion of broader taxonomic samples in comparative studies, and exploration of skeletal development, sexual dimorphism, and biogeographic patterns. Additionally, trends in the relative enlargement of the sensory capsules, reduction in cranial ossification and dentition, fusion of elements, and the appearance of novel morphological conditions, such as the structure and location of the suspensorium, may be related to fossoriality and miniaturization in some uropeltid taxa, and may complicate analysis of relationships within Uropeltidae and among alethinophidian snakes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22412874      PMCID: PMC3297617          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  16 in total

1.  The Pleistocene serpent Wonambi and the early evolution of snakes.

Authors:  J D Scanlon; M S Lee
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-27       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Higher-level relationships of snakes inferred from four nuclear and mitochondrial genes.

Authors:  Nicolas Vidal; S Blair Hedges
Journal:  C R Biol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.583

3.  Phylogenetic relationships of the dwarf boas and a comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support.

Authors:  Thomas P Wilcox; Derrick J Zwickl; Tracy A Heath; David M Hillis
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.286

4.  Scale microornamentation of uropeltid snakes.

Authors:  David J Gower
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.804

5.  Snake phylogeny: evidence from nuclear and mitochondrial genes.

Authors:  Joseph B Slowinski; Robin Lawson
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.286

6.  The origin of snakes.

Authors:  A D BELLAIRS; G UNDERWOOD
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1951-05

7.  Axial differences in the musculature of uropeltid snakes: the freight-train approach to burrowing.

Authors:  C Gans; H C Dessauer; D Baic
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-01-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  A redescription of Carrolla craddocki (Lepospondyli: Brachystelechidae) based on high-resolution CT, and the impacts of miniaturization and fossoriality on morphology.

Authors:  Hillary C Maddin; Jennifer C Olori; Jason S Anderson
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 1.804

9.  Higher-level snake phylogeny inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences of 12S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes.

Authors:  P J Heise; L R Maxson; H G Dowling; S B Hedges
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Local endemism within the Western Ghats-sri Lanka biodiversity hotspot.

Authors:  Franky Bossuyt; Madhava Meegaskumbura; Natalie Beenaerts; David J Gower; Rohan Pethiyagoda; Kim Roelants; An Mannaert; Mark Wilkinson; Mohomed M Bahir; Kelum Manamendra-Arachchi; Peter K L Ng; Christopher J Schneider; Oommen V Oommen; Michel C Milinkovitch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  9 in total

1.  Patterns of postnatal ontogeny of the skull and lower jaw of snakes as revealed by micro-CT scan data and three-dimensional geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Alessandro Palci; Michael S Y Lee; Mark N Hutchinson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Cranial Morphology of the Brachystelechid 'Microsaur' Quasicaecilia texana Carroll Provides New Insights into the Diversity and Evolution of Braincase Morphology in Recumbirostran 'Microsaurs'.

Authors:  Jason D Pardo; Matt Szostakiwskyj; Jason S Anderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Postnatal ontogeny and the evolution of macrostomy in snakes.

Authors:  Agustín Scanferla
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Cranial osteology of Hypoptophis (Aparallactinae: Atractaspididae: Caenophidia), with a discussion on the evolution of its fossorial adaptations.

Authors:  Sunandan Das; Jonathan Brecko; Olivier S G Pauwels; Juha Merilä
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 1.966

5.  Convergence, divergence, and macroevolutionary constraint as revealed by anatomical network analysis of the squamate skull, with an emphasis on snakes.

Authors:  Catherine R C Strong; Mark D Scherz; Michael W Caldwell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Variation in the skulls of Elgaria and Gerrhonotus (Anguidae, Gerrhonotinae) and implications for phylogenetics and fossil identification.

Authors:  David T Ledesma; Simon G Scarpetta; Christopher J Bell
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Embryonic development of skull bones in the Sahara horned viper (Cerastes cerastes), with new insights into structures related to the basicranium and braincase roof.

Authors:  Eraqi R Khannoon; Joni Ollonen; Nicolas Di-Poï
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.921

8.  Comparative skull anatomy of terrestrial and crevice-dwelling Trachylepis skinks (Squamata: Scincidae) with a survey of resources in scincid cranial osteology.

Authors:  Daniel J Paluh; Aaron M Bauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  New skulls and skeletons of the Cretaceous legged snake Najash, and the evolution of the modern snake body plan.

Authors:  Fernando F Garberoglio; Sebastián Apesteguía; Tiago R Simões; Alessandro Palci; Raúl O Gómez; Randall L Nydam; Hans C E Larsson; Michael S Y Lee; Michael W Caldwell
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 14.136

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.