Literature DB >> 22412661

2,4-Diiodo-6-[(propyl-imino)-meth-yl]phenol.

Peng-Gang Liu1, Xiao-Ning Wang, Yong-An Yang, Hai-Liang Zhu.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(10)H(11)I(2)NO, was prepared by the reaction of n class="Chemical">3,5-diiodo-salicyl-aldehyde with propyl-amine in ethanol. The mol-ecule adopts an E conformation with respect to the C=N bond and the aromatic ring. The aromatic ring and the imino unit are close to being coplanar, with a dihedral angle of 2.6 (3)° between their planes. This planarity is assisted by the formation of an intra-molecular O-H⋯O hydrogen bond.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22412661      PMCID: PMC3297858          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812005727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the biological activity of Schiff base compounds, see: Chohan et al. (2012 ▶); Yan et al. (2011 ▶); Zhang et al. (2011 ▶). For their use as ligands in coordination chemistry, see: You et al. (2008 ▶); Xu et al. (2009 ▶); Chen et al. (2010 ▶); Cui et al. (2011 ▶). For standard bond distances, see: Allen et al. (1987 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C10H11I2NO M = 415.00 Orthorhombic, a = 10.7019 (14) Å b = 7.1483 (9) Å c = 32.404 (4) Å V = 2478.9 (5) Å3 Z = 8 Mo Kα radiation μ = 5.05 mm−1 T = 298 K 0.21 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.417, T max = 0.432 18976 measured reflections 2704 independent reflections 2224 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.030

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.035 wR(F 2) = 0.104 S = 1.23 2704 reflections 131 parameters 1 restraint H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.96 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.89 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1998 ▶); data reduction: SAIn class="Chemical">NT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812005727/sj5194sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812005727/sj5194Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812005727/sj5194Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H11I2NOF(000) = 1536
Mr = 415.00Dx = 2.224 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PbcaMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 1027 reflections
a = 10.7019 (14) Åθ = 2.3–24.5°
b = 7.1483 (9) ŵ = 5.05 mm1
c = 32.404 (4) ÅT = 298 K
V = 2478.9 (5) Å3Block, yellow
Z = 80.21 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer2704 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2224 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.030
ω scansθmax = 27.0°, θmin = 2.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)h = −13→13
Tmin = 0.417, Tmax = 0.432k = −9→8
18976 measured reflectionsl = −41→41
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.104H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.23w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.038P)2 + 7.4143P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2704 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
131 parametersΔρmax = 0.96 e Å3
1 restraintΔρmin = −0.89 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
I10.14060 (4)0.18844 (7)0.522554 (12)0.05384 (15)
I2−0.14147 (3)0.44774 (7)0.371421 (13)0.05752 (16)
N10.3755 (4)0.4405 (7)0.34042 (16)0.0449 (11)
O10.1359 (4)0.4554 (7)0.33939 (13)0.0520 (10)
C10.2521 (5)0.3571 (7)0.39908 (16)0.0378 (11)
C20.1382 (5)0.3981 (8)0.37824 (17)0.0393 (11)
C30.0266 (5)0.3772 (7)0.40084 (16)0.0396 (11)
C40.0250 (5)0.3193 (8)0.44167 (17)0.0444 (12)
H4−0.05010.30870.45590.053*
C50.1389 (5)0.2770 (7)0.46109 (17)0.0397 (11)
C60.2501 (5)0.2976 (7)0.44023 (16)0.0415 (11)
H60.32500.27160.45370.050*
C70.3699 (5)0.3819 (8)0.37775 (18)0.0431 (12)
H70.44380.35440.39160.052*
C80.4981 (6)0.4653 (9)0.32071 (19)0.0520 (14)
H8A0.56360.43430.34020.062*
H8B0.50850.59520.31270.062*
C90.5099 (6)0.3412 (10)0.28282 (19)0.0572 (16)
H9A0.44860.37910.26240.069*
H9B0.49260.21260.29040.069*
C100.6403 (7)0.3541 (14)0.2642 (2)0.077 (2)
H10A0.65670.48090.25610.115*
H10B0.64530.27400.24050.115*
H10C0.70090.31540.28430.115*
H10.211 (3)0.471 (11)0.327 (2)0.080*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
I10.0536 (2)0.0651 (3)0.0428 (2)−0.0002 (2)−0.00119 (15)0.00945 (18)
I20.0393 (2)0.0751 (3)0.0582 (3)0.00399 (19)−0.01085 (16)0.0073 (2)
N10.039 (2)0.045 (3)0.050 (3)−0.002 (2)0.0032 (19)−0.001 (2)
O10.048 (2)0.060 (3)0.048 (2)0.004 (2)−0.0015 (17)0.008 (2)
C10.037 (2)0.032 (3)0.045 (3)0.003 (2)−0.002 (2)−0.005 (2)
C20.044 (3)0.035 (3)0.040 (3)0.001 (2)−0.004 (2)−0.006 (2)
C30.039 (3)0.035 (3)0.045 (3)0.004 (2)−0.008 (2)−0.002 (2)
C40.040 (3)0.042 (3)0.052 (3)0.002 (2)0.002 (2)−0.002 (2)
C50.045 (3)0.033 (3)0.042 (3)0.002 (2)−0.003 (2)0.001 (2)
C60.040 (3)0.036 (3)0.048 (3)0.004 (2)−0.005 (2)−0.003 (2)
C70.041 (3)0.043 (3)0.045 (3)0.002 (2)−0.002 (2)−0.009 (2)
C80.041 (3)0.059 (4)0.057 (3)−0.006 (3)0.005 (2)0.000 (3)
C90.057 (4)0.067 (4)0.048 (3)−0.006 (3)0.005 (3)−0.001 (3)
C100.070 (5)0.099 (6)0.061 (4)−0.003 (4)0.017 (3)0.005 (4)
I1—C52.090 (5)C5—C61.377 (7)
I2—C32.097 (5)C6—H60.9300
N1—C71.282 (8)C7—H70.9300
N1—C81.471 (7)C8—C91.520 (9)
O1—C21.324 (7)C8—H8A0.9700
O1—H10.900 (10)C8—H8B0.9700
C1—C61.400 (7)C9—C101.523 (9)
C1—C21.424 (7)C9—H9A0.9700
C1—C71.449 (7)C9—H9B0.9700
C2—C31.409 (7)C10—H10A0.9600
C3—C41.386 (8)C10—H10B0.9600
C4—C51.405 (7)C10—H10C0.9600
C4—H40.9300
C7—N1—C8119.4 (5)N1—C7—H7119.0
C2—O1—H1116 (5)C1—C7—H7119.0
C6—C1—C2120.1 (5)N1—C8—C9110.7 (5)
C6—C1—C7120.3 (5)N1—C8—H8A109.5
C2—C1—C7119.6 (5)C9—C8—H8A109.5
O1—C2—C3120.7 (5)N1—C8—H8B109.5
O1—C2—C1122.1 (5)C9—C8—H8B109.5
C3—C2—C1117.2 (5)H8A—C8—H8B108.1
C4—C3—C2122.6 (5)C8—C9—C10111.1 (6)
C4—C3—I2119.7 (4)C8—C9—H9A109.4
C2—C3—I2117.7 (4)C10—C9—H9A109.4
C3—C4—C5118.7 (5)C8—C9—H9B109.4
C3—C4—H4120.6C10—C9—H9B109.4
C5—C4—H4120.6H9A—C9—H9B108.0
C6—C5—C4120.5 (5)C9—C10—H10A109.5
C6—C5—I1119.5 (4)C9—C10—H10B109.5
C4—C5—I1120.0 (4)H10A—C10—H10B109.5
C5—C6—C1120.9 (5)C9—C10—H10C109.5
C5—C6—H6119.6H10A—C10—H10C109.5
C1—C6—H6119.6H10B—C10—H10C109.5
N1—C7—C1122.1 (5)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···N10.90 (1)1.82 (5)2.567 (6)138 (7)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯N10.90 (1)1.82 (5)2.567 (6)138 (7)
  5 in total

1.  Synthesis, molecular docking and biological evaluation of Schiff base transition metal complexes as potential urease inhibitors.

Authors:  Wu Chen; Yuguang Li; Yongming Cui; Xian Zhang; Hai-Liang Zhu; Qingfu Zeng
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Synthesis, characterization and biological studies of sulfonamide Schiff's bases and some of their metal derivatives.

Authors:  Zahid H Chohan; Hazoor A Shad; Claudiu T Supuran
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 5.051

4.  Synthesis, antibacterial activities and molecular docking studies of Schiff bases derived from N-(2/4-benzaldehyde-amino) phenyl-N'-phenyl-thiourea.

Authors:  Hong-Jia Zhang; Xuan Qin; Kai Liu; Di-Di Zhu; Xiao-Ming Wang; Hai-Liang Zhu
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Schiff base transition metal complexes as novel inhibitors of xanthine oxidase.

Authors:  Zhong-Lu You; Da-Hua Shi; Chen Xu; Qiang Zhang; Hai-Liang Zhu
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 6.514

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.