Literature DB >> 22412656

6-Hydrazinylnicotinic acid: a powder study.

Mwaffak Rukiah1, Atef Arfan.   

Abstract

The structure of the title compound, C(6)H(7)N(3)O(2), is of inter-est with respect to radiopharmacueticals. The crystal packing is characterized by N-H⋯O and O-H⋯N hydrogen bonds, which form a three-dimensional network. The molecule is planar except for one of the amine H atoms.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22412656      PMCID: PMC3297853          DOI: 10.1107/S160053681200637X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background on radiopharmacueticals, see: Callahan et al. (1996 ▶); Rennen et al. (2000 ▶). For general background, see: Abrams et al. (1990 ▶). For details of the synthesis, see: Schwartz et al. (1995 ▶). For geometric data, see: Allen et al. (1987 ▶). For descriptions of the powder diffraction profile, see: Thompson et al. (1987 ▶); Finger et al. (1994 ▶); Stephens (1999 ▶); Von Dreele (1997 ▶). For refinement by the LeBail method, see: Le Bail et al. (1988 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C6H7N3O2 M = 153.15 Monoclinic, a = 6.69930 (14) Å b = 13.8834 (2) Å c = 7.10677 (9) Å β = 91.7805 (11)° V = 660.67 (2) Å3 Z = 4 Cu Kα1 radiation λ = 1.5406 Å μ = 1.01 mm−1 T = 298 K Flat sheet, 8 × 8 mm

Data collection

Stoe STADI P diffractometer Specimen mounting: powder loaded between two Mylar foils Data collection mode: transmission Scan method: step Absorption correction: for a cylinder mounted on the ϕ axis [flat-plate transmission absorption correction (GSAS absorption/surface roughness correction function number 4 with a non-refined term of μd = 0.1482)] T min = 0.732, T max = 0.795 2θmin = 9.969°, 2θmax = 84.949°, 2θstep = 0.02°

Refinement

R p = 0.023 R wp = 0.030 R exp = 0.021 R(F 2) = 0.01796 χ2 = 2.016 4250 data points 146 parameters 26 restraints Only H-atom coordinates refined Data collection: WinXPOW (Stoe & Cie, 1999 ▶); cell refinement: FULLPROF (Rodriguez-Carvajal, 2001 ▶) and GSAS (Larson & Von Dreele, 2004 ▶); data reduction: WinXPOW, DICVOL04 (Boultif & Louër, 2004 ▶), and CheckGroup interfaced by WinPLOTR (Roisnel & Rodriguez-Carvajal, 2001 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: EXPO2009 (Altomare et al., 2009 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: GSAS interfaced by EXPGUI (Toby, 2001 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681200637X/fy2040sup1.cif Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C6H7N3O2F(000) = 320
Mr = 153.15Dx = 1.54 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cCu Kα1 radiation, λ = 1.5406 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcµ = 1.01 mm1
a = 6.69930 (14) ÅT = 298 K
b = 13.8834 (2) ÅParticle morphology: Fine powder
c = 7.10677 (9) Åpale brown
β = 91.7805 (11)°flat sheet, 8 × 8 mm
V = 660.67 (2) Å3Specimen preparation: Prepared at 298 K and 101.3 kPa
Z = 4
Stoe STADI P diffractometerScan method: step
Radiation source: sealed X-ray tubeAbsorption correction: for a cylinder mounted on the φ axis [Flat-plate transmission absorption correction (GSAS absorption/surface roughness correction function number 4 with a non-refined term of µd = 0.1482)]
Curved Ge(111) monochromatorTmin = 0.732, Tmax = 0.795
Specimen mounting: powder loaded between two Mylar foilsmin = 9.969°, 2θmax = 84.949°, 2θstep = 0.02°
Data collection mode: transmission
Least-squares matrix: full146 parameters
Rp = 0.02326 restraints
Rwp = 0.030Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Rexp = 0.021Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R(F2) = 0.01796Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
χ2 = 2.016Only H-atom coordinates refined
4250 data points(Δ/σ)max = 0.03
Excluded region(s): The use of the excluded region from 85 to 95° (2θ) leads to better molecular geometry.Background function: Shifted Chebyshev function of 1st kind (GSAS Background function number 1) with 15 terms 1: 1800.66 2: -1847.80 3: 941.880 4: -249.680 5: 12.6164 6: 58.5368 7: -22.4573 8: -39.9081 9: 32.2315 10: 0.665645 11: -20.8095 12: 16.0647 13: -6.68008 14: -5.95330 15: 5.95798
Profile function: GSAS CW profile function number 4 with 21 terms, i.e., pseudovoigt profile coefficients as parameterized in (Thompson et al., 1987), asymmetry correction of Finger et al. (1994) and microstrain broadening by Stephens (1999). #1(GU) = 0.000 #2(GV) = 0.000 #3(GW) = 8.378 #4(GP) = 0.000 #5(LX) = 1.698 #6(ptec) = 0.00 #7(trns) = 0.00 #8(shft) = 0.0000 #9(sfec) = 0.00 #10(S/L) = 0.0225 #11(H/L) = 0.0228 #12(eta) = 0.6000 #13(S400 ) = 2.2E-01 #14(S040 ) = 3.7E-03 #15(S004 ) = 4.3E-01 #16(S220 ) = 3.8E-02 #17(S202 ) = 2.3E-01 #18(S022 ) = 5.1E-01 #19(S301 ) = -2.6E-01 #20(S103 ) = 1.6E-01 #21(S121 ) = -1.9E-01. Peak tails are ignored where the intensity is below 0.0010 times the peak. Aniso. broadening axis 0.0 0.0 1.0Preferred orientation correction: spherical hamonics function
Experimental. The sample was ground lightly in a mortar, loaded between two Mylar foils and fixed in the sample holder with a mask of 8.0 mm internal diameter.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.0949 (15)0.0911 (6)0.7824 (15)0.025 (3)*
C20.3019 (11)0.0838 (5)0.8434 (12)0.024 (3)*
C30.4127 (11)0.1653 (6)0.8763 (12)0.035 (4)*
C40.3286 (12)0.2568 (6)0.8428 (14)0.018 (3)*
C50.0146 (12)0.1829 (7)0.7521 (12)0.039 (5)*
C6−0.035 (2)0.0069 (9)0.7503 (17)0.047 (4)*
N10.1331 (11)0.2628 (5)0.7828 (11)0.026 (3)*
N20.4164 (12)0.3424 (4)0.8716 (12)0.034 (3)*
N30.6139 (10)0.3455 (6)0.9453 (13)0.050 (3)*
O1−0.2097 (8)0.0126 (4)0.7110 (10)0.032 (3)*
O20.0600 (8)−0.0758 (5)0.7824 (11)0.043 (3)*
H20.362 (2)0.0198 (11)0.869 (3)0.029 (4)*
H30.554 (3)0.1597 (10)0.917 (3)0.042 (4)*
H5−0.127 (3)0.1905 (12)0.707 (3)0.047 (5)*
H1N20.364 (4)0.3948 (12)0.816 (6)0.052 (4)*
H1N30.696 (2)0.325 (5)0.861 (5)0.075 (5)*
H2N30.644 (4)0.4040 (17)0.977 (10)0.075 (5)*
H1O2−0.018 (3)−0.1211 (10)0.768 (4)0.065 (4)*
C1—C21.444 (10)C6—C11.471 (15)
C2—C31.369 (9)C6—O11.198 (12)
C2—H20.990 (14)C6—O21.328 (11)
C3—C41.407 (10)N2—C41.339 (7)
C3—H30.981 (14)N2—N31.409 (7)
C4—N11.367 (9)N2—H1N20.89 (3)
N1—C51.378 (9)N3—H1N30.87 (3)
C5—C11.397 (12)N3—H2N30.87 (3)
C5—H50.997 (14)O2—H1O20.824 (14)
C2—C1—C5118.2 (7)C1—C5—H5120.3 (13)
C2—C1—C6123.3 (9)N1—C5—H5120.2 (13)
C5—C1—C6118.6 (9)C1—C6—O1123.5 (12)
C1—C2—C3120.3 (6)C1—C6—O2112.5 (10)
C1—C2—H2119.9 (6)O1—C6—O2123.8 (13)
C3—C2—H2119.7 (6)C4—N1—C5122.8 (8)
C2—C3—C4120.3 (7)C4—N2—N3119.2 (7)
C2—C3—H3119.8 (6)C4—N2—H1N2119 (2)
C4—C3—H3119.8 (6)N3—N2—H1N2119.4 (18)
C3—C4—N1118.9 (7)N2—N3—H1N3110 (2)
C3—C4—N2127.1 (8)N2—N3—H2N3110 (2)
N1—C4—N2113.9 (8)H1N3—N3—H2N3110 (5)
C1—C5—N1119.5 (6)C6—O2—H1O2109.9 (15)
C4—N1—C5—C1−0.1 (13)C5—C1—C2—C32.2 (14)
C5—N1—C4—N2−177.5 (8)C2—C1—C6—O2−0.5 (15)
C5—N1—C4—C3−0.5 (13)C5—C1—C6—O1−4.9 (17)
N3—N2—C4—N1175.9 (8)C2—C1—C6—O1175.2 (10)
N3—N2—C4—C3−0.8 (15)C5—C1—C6—O2179.4 (9)
C2—C1—C5—N1−0.7 (13)C1—C2—C3—C4−2.9 (13)
C6—C1—C5—N1179.5 (9)C2—C3—C4—N2178.6 (9)
C6—C1—C2—C3−178.0 (10)C2—C3—C4—N12.1 (13)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H1N2···O1i0.89 (3)1.94 (2)2.792 (8)158 (4)
N3—H1N3···O2ii0.87 (3)2.39 (4)2.967 (10)124 (6)
N3—H2N3···O1iii0.87 (3)2.23 (6)2.950 (11)141 (5)
O2—H1O2···N1iv0.822 (15)1.818 (16)2.622 (10)165.2 (18)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N2—H1N2⋯O1i0.89 (3)1.94 (2)2.792 (8)158 (4)
N3—H1N3⋯O2ii0.87 (3)2.39 (4)2.967 (10)124 (6)
N3—H2N3⋯O1iii0.87 (3)2.23 (6)2.950 (11)141 (5)
O2—H1O2⋯N1iv0.822 (15)1.818 (16)2.622 (10)165.2 (18)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) .

  3 in total

1.  Technetium-99m-human polyclonal IgG radiolabeled via the hydrazino nicotinamide derivative for imaging focal sites of infection in rats.

Authors:  M J Abrams; M Juweid; C I tenKate; D A Schwartz; M M Hauser; F E Gaul; A J Fuccello; R H Rubin; H W Strauss; A J Fischman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Biodistribution and dosimetry of technetium-99m-hydrazino nicotinamide IgG: comparison with indium-111-DTPA-IgG.

Authors:  R J Callahan; S A Barrow; M J Abrams; R H Rubin; A J Fischman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Labeling proteins with Tc-99m via hydrazinonicotinamide (HYNIC): optimization of the conjugation reaction.

Authors:  H J Rennen; O C Boerman; E B Koenders; W J Oyen; F H Corstens
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.408

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.