Literature DB >> 22412445

catena-Poly[[diiodidomercury(II)]-μ(2)-2-amino-pyrazine-κN:N].

Sadif A Shirvan, Mohammad R Asghariganjeh, Manouchehr Aghajeri, Sara Haydari Dezfuli, Farzaneh Hossini.   

Abstract

In the crystal of the title polymeric compound, [HgI(2)(C(4)H(5)N(3))](n), the Hg(II) cation is located on a twofold n class="Disease">rotation axis and is coordinated by two I(-) anions and two 2-amino-pyrazine ligands in a distorted HgI(2)N(2) tetra-hedral geometry. In the crystal, the 2-amino-pyrazine ligand is equally disordered over two positions about an inversion center, and bridges the Hg(II) cations with pyrazine N atoms to form a polymeric chain running along the c axis. In the polymeric chain, the amino groups link to the coordinated I(-) anions via inter-molecular N-H⋯I hydrogen bonds.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22412445      PMCID: PMC3297255          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812006149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related structures, see: Sun et al. (2009 ▶); Pagola et al. (2008 ▶); Boonmak et al. (2010 ▶); Gao & Ng (2011 ▶); Goher et al. (2008 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[HgI2(C4H5N3)] M = 549.50 Monoclinic, a = 15.3389 (19) Å b = 6.8791 (8) Å c = 9.6239 (11) Å β = 103.828 (10)° V = 986.1 (2) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 21.81 mm−1 T = 298 K 0.50 × 0.05 × 0.04 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001 ▶) T min = 0.275, T max = 0.417 2648 measured reflections 933 independent reflections 911 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.173

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.083 wR(F 2) = 0.224 S = 1.08 933 reflections 52 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 2.67 e Å−3 Δρmin = −2.69 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812006149/xu5467sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812006149/xu5467Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[HgI2(C4H5N3)]F(000) = 944
Mr = 549.50Dx = 3.701 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 2648 reflections
a = 15.3389 (19) Åθ = 2.7–26.0°
b = 6.8791 (8) ŵ = 21.81 mm1
c = 9.6239 (11) ÅT = 298 K
β = 103.828 (10)°Needle, colorless
V = 986.1 (2) Å30.50 × 0.05 × 0.04 mm
Z = 4
Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer933 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube911 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.173
ω scansθmax = 26.0°, θmin = 2.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001)h = −18→18
Tmin = 0.275, Tmax = 0.417k = −8→8
2648 measured reflectionsl = −11→8
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.083H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.224w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1405P)2 + 17.0935P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.08(Δ/σ)max = 0.002
933 reflectionsΔρmax = 2.67 e Å3
52 parametersΔρmin = −2.69 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.015 (2)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
C10.0725 (10)0.383 (2)0.5415 (17)0.042 (3)
H10.12340.30630.57100.050*
C2−0.0746 (11)0.455 (2)0.542 (2)0.044 (3)
H2C−0.12740.42400.56940.054*0.50
N1−0.0046 (8)0.3371 (17)0.5809 (12)0.040 (2)
N2−0.154 (2)0.409 (5)0.578 (4)0.059 (8)0.50
H2A−0.15860.30480.62510.071*0.50
H2B−0.19990.48560.55310.071*0.50
Hg10.00000.05992 (11)0.75000.0451 (6)
I10.16288 (9)−0.07523 (19)0.76493 (17)0.0629 (7)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.038 (7)0.040 (7)0.051 (7)0.005 (6)0.016 (6)0.008 (7)
C20.034 (7)0.046 (8)0.055 (9)−0.003 (5)0.016 (6)0.005 (6)
N10.039 (6)0.035 (5)0.050 (6)0.002 (4)0.018 (5)0.004 (5)
N20.054 (17)0.062 (17)0.070 (17)0.020 (14)0.032 (15)0.034 (14)
Hg10.0390 (8)0.0411 (8)0.0576 (8)0.0000.0164 (5)0.000
I10.0484 (10)0.0655 (10)0.0793 (11)0.0199 (5)0.0241 (7)0.0154 (5)
C1—N11.363 (19)N1—Hg12.497 (11)
C1—C2i1.38 (2)N2—H2A0.8600
C1—H10.9300N2—H2B0.8600
C2—N11.33 (2)Hg1—I1ii2.6372 (13)
C2—H2C0.9300Hg1—I12.6373 (13)
C2—C1i1.38 (2)Hg1—N1ii2.497 (11)
C2—N21.38 (4)
N1—C1—C2i119.6 (14)C1—N1—Hg1117.9 (10)
N1—C1—H1120.2C2—N2—H2A120.0
C2i—C1—H1120.2C2—N2—H2B120.0
C1i—C2—H2C119.0H2A—N2—H2B120.0
N1i—C2—H2C149.0N1ii—Hg1—N180.4 (5)
N1—C2—C1i121.6 (15)N1ii—Hg1—I1ii100.6 (3)
N1—C2—N2120.0 (17)N1—Hg1—I1ii110.8 (3)
C1i—C2—N2118.2 (18)N1ii—Hg1—I1110.8 (3)
C2—N1—C1118.6 (13)N1—Hg1—I1100.6 (3)
C2—N1—Hg1122.9 (10)I1ii—Hg1—I1138.71 (7)
C1i—C2—N1—C13 (3)C2—N1—Hg1—N1ii−68.8 (12)
N2—C2—N1—C1179 (2)C1—N1—Hg1—N1ii102.6 (12)
C1i—C2—N1—Hg1174.4 (13)C2—N1—Hg1—I1ii29.0 (13)
N2—C2—N1—Hg1−10 (3)C1—N1—Hg1—I1ii−159.7 (10)
C2i—C1—N1—C2−3 (3)C2—N1—Hg1—I1−178.4 (12)
C2i—C1—N1—Hg1−174.8 (12)C1—N1—Hg1—I1−7.0 (11)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2A···I1ii0.862.833.67 (3)169
Table 1

Selected bond lengths (Å)

Hg1—I12.6373 (13)
Hg1—N1i2.497 (11)

Symmetry code: (i) .

Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N2—H2A⋯I1i0.862.833.67 (3)169

Symmetry code: (i) .

  5 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Water-induced reversible structural phase transformation with chromotropism in metal supramolecular frameworks containing aminopyrazine and sulfate anions.

Authors:  Jaursup Boonmak; Motohiro Nakano; Narongsak Chaichit; Chaveng Pakawatchai; Sujittra Youngme
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.390

3.  Poly[bis(mu2-2-aminopyrazine-kappa2N1:N4)(mu2-nitrato-kappa2O:O)(nitrato-kappa2O,O')disilver(I)]: an achiral two-dimensional coordination polymer forming chiral crystals.

Authors:  Di Sun; Geng-Geng Luo; Na Zhang; Rong-Bin Huang; Lan-Sun Zheng
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 1.172

4.  Poly[mu-2-aminopyrazine-kappa2N1:N4-mu-cyanido-copper(I)]: a three-dimensional network from laboratory powder diffraction data.

Authors:  Silvina Pagola; Robert D Pike; Kathryn deKrafft; Tristan A Tronic
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 1.172

5.  Bis(2-amino-pyrazine-κN)dichlorido-zinc.

Authors:  Shan Gao; Seik Weng Ng
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-07-09
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Bis((E)-2-{3-[4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl-κN (3))styr-yl]-5,5-di-methyl-cyclo-hex-2-enyl-idene}malono-nitrile)-diiodido-mercury(II).

Authors:  Wen-Gang Xi; Zhi-Chao Wu; Hong-Ping Zhou
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2013-09-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.