Literature DB >> 22412170

Low-frequency repetitive TMS plus anodal transcranial DCS prevents transient decline in bimanual movement induced by contralesional inhibitory rTMS after stroke.

Naoyuki Takeuchi1, Takeo Tada, Yuichiro Matsuo, Katsunori Ikoma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the unaffected motor cortex may improve motor function of the paretic hand after stroke. However, low-frequency rTMS might adversely affect bimanual movement by decreasing transcallosal function.
OBJECTIVE: The authors investigated whether combined administration of rTMS and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) prevents deterioration of bimanual movement induced by low-frequency rTMS over the unaffected hemisphere.
METHODS: A total of 27 participants with chronic subcortical stroke were randomly assigned to receive either 1 Hz rTMS over the unaffected hemisphere, anodal tDCS over the affected hemisphere, or a combination of rTMS and tDCS. All patients performed a pinching motor-training task after stimulation. Bimanual movement and transcallosal inhibition (TCI) were evaluated after stimulation.
RESULTS: rTMS and rTMS-tDCS enhanced the motor training effect on the paretic hand. rTMS decreased bimanual coordination and reduced TCI from the unaffected to the affected hemisphere (TCI(unaff-aff)). rTMS-tDCS changed TCI balance of both hemispheres but did not affect bimanual coordination or TCI(unaff-aff). The change in bimanual coordination was negatively correlated with TCI(unaff-aff). Following stimulation, improvement in the pinch force in the paretic hand was negatively correlated with TCI balance.
CONCLUSIONS: Inhibitory rTMS over the unaffected hemisphere transiently caused deterioration of bimanual movements for the current task in stroke patients. This short-term decline was prevented by combined administration of low-frequency rTMS over the unaffected hemisphere and anodal tDCS over the affected hemisphere. These responses to bihemispheric stimulation suggest possible caution and opportunities for the rehabilitation of hand function after stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22412170     DOI: 10.1177/1545968311433295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  23 in total

Review 1.  Is neuroenhancement by noninvasive brain stimulation a net zero-sum proposition?

Authors:  Anna-Katharine Brem; Peter J Fried; Jared C Horvath; Edwin M Robertson; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Rethinking stimulation of the brain in stroke rehabilitation: why higher motor areas might be better alternatives for patients with greater impairments.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; David A Cunningham; Nicole Varnerin; Andre Machado
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 7.519

3.  Ipsilateral primary motor cortex and behavioral compensation after stroke: a case series study.

Authors:  Ali Bani-Ahmed; Carmen M Cirstea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Neural Substrates of Motor Recovery in Severely Impaired Stroke Patients With Hand Paralysis.

Authors:  Michelle L Harris-Love; Evan Chan; Alexander W Dromerick; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Effect of a contralateral lesion on neurological recovery from stroke in rats.

Authors:  Fen Sun; Lin Xie; XiaoOu Mao; Justin Hill; David A Greenberg; Kunlin Jin
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  Assessment of inter-hemispheric imbalance using imaging and noninvasive brain stimulation in patients with chronic stroke.

Authors:  David A Cunningham; Andre Machado; Daniel Janini; Nicole Varnerin; Corin Bonnett; Guang Yue; Stephen Jones; Mark Lowe; Erik Beall; Ken Sakaie; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 7.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke.

Authors:  Bernhard Elsner; Joachim Kugler; Marcus Pohl; Jan Mehrholz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-21

Review 8.  Maladaptive plasticity for motor recovery after stroke: mechanisms and approaches.

Authors:  Naoyuki Takeuchi; Shin-Ichi Izumi
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 9.  Motor control and neural plasticity through interhemispheric interactions.

Authors:  Naoyuki Takeuchi; Yutaka Oouchida; Shin-Ichi Izumi
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 10.  Study Paradigms and Principles Investigated in Motor Learning Research After Stroke: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Sarah Gregor; Tyler M Saumur; Lucas D Crosby; Jessica Powers; Kara K Patterson
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2021-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.