Literature DB >> 22411839

Adaptive designs for single-arm phase II trials in oncology.

Stefan Englert1, Meinhard Kieser.   

Abstract

Clinical phase II trials in oncology are conducted to determine whether the activity of a new anticancer treatment is promising enough to merit further investigation. Two-stage designs are commonly used for this situation to allow for early termination. Designs proposed in the literature so far have the common drawback that the sample sizes for the two stages have to be specified in the protocol and have to be adhered to strictly during the course of the trial. As a consequence, designs that allow a higher extent of flexibility are desirable. In this article, we propose a new adaptive method that allows an arbitrary modification of the sample size of the second stage using the results of the interim analysis or external information while controlling the type I error rate. If the sample size is not changed during the trial, the proposed design shows very similar characteristics to the optimal two-stage design proposed by Chang et al. (Biometrics 1987; 43:865-874). However, the new design allows the use of mid-course information for the planning of the second stage, thus meeting practical requirements when performing clinical phase II trials in oncology.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords:  adaptive design; clinical trial; discrete test statistics; phase II; two-stage design

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22411839     DOI: 10.1002/pst.541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Stat        ISSN: 1539-1604            Impact factor:   1.894


  6 in total

1.  Stopping for efficacy in single-arm phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  Rezoanoor Rahman; M Iftakhar Alam
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 1.416

2.  Antiemetic prophylaxis for chemoradiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective phase II trial.

Authors:  Zekun Wang; Wenyang Liu; Jianghu Zhang; Xuesong Chen; Jingbo Wang; Kai Wang; Yuan Qu; Xiaodong Huang; Jingwei Luo; Jianping Xiao; Guozhen Xu; Li Gao; Junlin Yi; Ye Zhang
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  A two-stage phase II clinical trial design with nested criteria for early stopping and efficacy.

Authors:  Michelle DeVeaux; Michael Kane; Wei Wei; Daniel Zelterman
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 1.894

4.  Adaptive graph-based multiple testing procedures.

Authors:  Florian Klinglmueller; Martin Posch; Franz Koenig
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 1.894

5.  Phase II study evaluating consolidation whole abdominal intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer stage FIGO III--the OVAR-IMRT-02 Study.

Authors:  Nathalie Rochet; Meinhard Kieser; Florian Sterzing; Sonja Krause; Katja Lindel; Wolfgang Harms; Michael H Eichbaum; Andreas Schneeweiss; Christof Sohn; Juergen Debus
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  What inference for two-stage phase II trials?

Authors:  Raphaël Porcher; Kristell Desseaux
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 4.615

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.